SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Acemoglu D, Pischke S. 1998. Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 79119.
  • Adner R, Polos L, Ryall M, Sorenson O. 2009. The case for formal theory. Academy of Management Review 34(2): 201208.
  • Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar MB. 2004. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin-out generation, development, and survival. Academy of Management Journal 47(4): 501522.
  • Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis RH. 2009. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management Journal 30(13): 13491374.
  • Almeida P, Kogut B. 1999. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science 45(7): 905917.
  • Anton J, Yao D. 1995. Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11(2): 362378.
  • Barney J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99120.
  • Bettis JC, Bizjak JM, Lemmon ML. 2005. Exercise behavior, valuation, and the incentive effects of employee stock options. Journal of Financial Economics 76: 445470.
  • Bhide A. 1994. How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Business Review 72(2): 150161.
  • Bishara N. 2011. 50 ways to leave your employer: relative enforcement of covenants not to compete, trends, and implications for employee mobility policy. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 13(3): 751796.
  • Business Wire. 2002. Pixar files trade secret, copyright, and patent claims against Exluna. Business Wire 16 May. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Pixar%20Animation%20Studios%20Files%20Trade%20Secret,%20Copyright%20and%20Patent...-a085972115
  • Campbell B, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R. 2012. Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 33: 6587.
  • Cassiman B, Ueda M. 2006. Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. Management Science 52(2): 262275.
  • Castanias RP, Helfat CE. 2001. The managerial rents model: theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management 27: 661678.
  • Coff RW. 1997. Human assets and management dilemmas: coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Academy of Management Review 22(2): 374402.
  • Coff RW, Kryscynski D. 2011. Drilling for the micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management 37: 14291443.
  • Core JE, Guay WR. 2001. Stock option plans for non-executive employees. Journal of Financial Economics 61: 253287.
  • Fallick B, Fleischman CA, Rebitzer JB. 2006. Job hopping in Silicon Valley: some evidence concerning the microfoundations of a high-technology cluster. Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3): 472481.
  • Filatotchev I, Liu X, Lu J, Wright M. 2011. Knowledge spillovers through human mobility across national borders: evidence from Zhongguancun Science Park in China. Research Policy 40(3): 453462.
  • Franco AM, Filson D. 2006. Spin-outs: knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. Rand Journal of Economics 37(4): 841860.
  • Galasso A, Schankerman M. 2010. Patent thickets, courts, and the market for innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 41: 472503.
  • Garmaise MJ. 2009. Ties that truly bind: noncompetition agreements, executive compensation, and firm investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 27(2): 376425.
  • Gilson RJ. 1999. The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. New York University Law Review 74: 575629.
  • Gourieroux C, Montfort A, Trognon A. 1984. Pseudo-maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models. Econometrica 52: 701720.
  • Graham S, Merges R, Samuelson P, Sichelman T. 2010. High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system: results of the 2008 Berkeley patent survey. Berkeley Technology Law Review 24: 12581328.
  • Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. 2001. The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w8498.pdf (accessed 13 May 2009).
  • Hall BH, Ziedonis RH. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. Rand Journal of Economics 32(1): 101128.
  • Hannah DR. 2005. Should I keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees' obligations to protect trade secrets. Organization Science 16(1): 7184.
  • Hellmann T. 2007. When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science 53: 919933.
  • Hoisl K. 2007. Tracing mobile inventors: causality between inventor mobility and productivity. Research Policy 36: 619636.
  • Horn P, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Griffeth R. 2012. Reviewing employee turnover. Psychological Bulletin 138: 831858.
  • Hvide HK, Kristiansen EG. 2011. Management of knowledge workers. SSRN Working paper 900569. Norwegian School of Economics: Bergen, Norway. Available at: SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=900569 (accessed 10 June 2013).
  • Hyde A. 2003. Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market. ME Sharpe Publishers: New York.
  • Ittner CD, Lambert RA, Larcker DF. 2003. The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34: 89127.
  • Jones A. 2013. Samsung-Apple patent fight: is it worth it? Wall Street Journal. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323687604578467263432599452.html (accessed 7 May 2013).
  • Kedia S, Rajgopal S. 2009. Neighborhood matters: the impact of location on broad based stock option plans. Journal of Financial Economics 92: 109127.
  • Kerstetter J. 2000. The dark side of the valley: in techdom's win-at-all-costs culture, hardball tactics and dirty tricks are just part of doing business. Business Week 17 July: 4445.
  • Kesan J, Ball G. 2006. How are patent cases resolved? An empirical examination of the adjudication and settlement of patent disputes. Washington University Law Review 84(2): 237312.
  • Kesan J, Ball G. 2011. The impact of general and patent-specific judicial experience on the efficiency and accuracy of patent adjudication. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 24: 393467.
  • Kim J, Marschke G. 2005. Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision. Rand Journal of Economics 36(2): 298317.
  • Klepper S, Sleeper S. 2005. Entry by spin-offs. Management Science 51(8): 12911306.
  • Kreps D, Wilson R. 1982. Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 253279.
  • Lampe R. 2012. Strategic Citation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1): 320333.
  • Landes WM, Posner RA. 2003. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M. 2004. Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. Rand Journal of Economics 32(1): 129151.
  • Lerner J. 1995. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Journal of Law and Economics 38: 563595.
  • Marx M. 2011. The firms strike back: post-employment restraints and the inalienability of expertise. American Sociological Review 75(5): 694712.
  • Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L. 2009. Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Science 23(6): 875889.
  • McKeon SB. 2013. Firm-initiated versus investor-initiated equity issues. University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. SSRN Working paper 1920985. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1920985 (accessed 10 June 2013).
  • Merges RP. 1999. The law and economics of employee inventions. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 13(1): 254.
  • Mithas S, Lucas CL. 2010. Are foreign IT workers cheaper? U.S. visa policies and compensation of information technology professionals. Management Science 56(5): 745765.
  • Moen J. 2005. Is mobility a source of R&D spillovers? Journal of Labor Economics 23(1): 81114.
  • Moore KA. 2001. Forum shopping in patent cases: does geographic choice affect innovation. Journal of Trademark and the Patent Office Society 83(9): 603678.
  • Moore KP, Michel PR, Lupo RV. 1999. Patent Litigation and Strategy. West Group: Minneapolis, MN.
  • Murphy T. 2000. Intel tries to clip Broadcom's wings: firms battle over IP talent. Electronics News 4 September. 46(36): 2.
  • Oettl A, Agrawal A. 2008. International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities. Journal of International Business Studies 39(8): 12421260.
  • Pakes A, Nitzan S. 1983. Optimum contracts for research personnel, research deployment, and the establishment of ‘rival’ enterprises. Journal of Labor Economics 1: 345365.
  • Palomeras N, Melero E. 2010. Markets for inventors: learning-by-hiring as a driver of mobility. Management Science 56(5): 881895.
  • Parrotta P, Pozzoli D. 2012. The effect of learning by hiring on productivity. Rand Journal of Economics 43(1): 167185.
  • Phillips DJ. 2002. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: the parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly 47(3): 474506.
  • Png I. 2012. Trade secrets, non-competes, and inventor mobility: empirical evidence. National University Singapore, Singapore. SSRN Working paper 1986775. Available at: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/∼ipng/research (accessed 10 June 2013).
  • Raffo J, Lhuillery S. 2009. How to play the ‘names game’: patent retrieval comparing different heuristics. Research Policy 38: 16171627.
  • Rosenkopf L, Almeida P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science 49(6): 751766.
  • Samila S, Sorenson O. 2011. Non-compete covenants: incentives to innovate or impediments to growth. Management Science 57(3): 425438.
  • Saxenian AL. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in the Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Shachtman N. 2008. Who stole the plans for iRobot's battle bots? Wired Magazine 16 p. 5, 21 April. Available at: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-05/mf_robotthief?currentPage=all.html (accessed 3 May 2010)
  • Singh J, Agrawal A. 2011. Recruiting for ideas: how firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Science 57(1): 129150.
  • Solow R. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312320.
  • Somaya D. 2003. Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management Journal 24: 1738.
  • Song J, Almeida P, Wu G. 2003. Learning–by–hiring: when is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science 49(4): 351365.
  • Spence AM. 1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Stuart TE, Sorenson O. 2003. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 175201.
  • Toh PK, Kim TK. 2013. Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm's technological specialization. Organization Science, 24: 12141236.
  • Trajtenberg M, Shiff G, Melamed R. 2006. The ‘names game’: harnessing inventors' patent data for economic research. NBER Working paper 12479. National Bureau of of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
  • Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM. 2006. Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organization Science 17(6): 691709.
  • Wooldridge J. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Ziedonis RH. 2003. Patent litigation in the semiconductor industry. In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Cohen W, Merrill S (eds). National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 180215.