SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ali A, Kalwani MU, Kovenock D. 1993. Selecting product development projects: pioneering versus incremental innovation strategies. Management Science 39: 255274.
  • Anand BN, Khanna T. 2000. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21: 295315.
  • Barney JB. 1999. How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Review 40(3): 137145.
  • Barney JB. 2001. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review 26(1): 4156.
  • Bettis RA, Bradley SP, Hamel G. 1992. Outsourcing and industrial decline. Academy of Management Executive 6: 722.
  • Buzzell RD, Gale BT. 1987. The PIMS Principles–Linking Strategy of Performance. Free Press: New York.
  • Calantone RJ, Vickery SK, Droge C. 1995. Business performance and strategic new product development activities: an empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12: 214223.
  • Chaney PK, Devinney TM. 1992. New product innovations and stock price performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19(5): 677695.
  • Cohen SS, Zysman J. 1988. Manufacturing innovation and American industrial competitiveness. Science 239(4845): 11101115.
  • Combs JG, Ketchen DJ Jr. 1999. Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal 20(9): 867888.
  • Cooper G. 2000. Strategic marketing planning for radically new products. Journal of Marketing 64: 116.
  • Davenport T. 1992. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Day G. 1999. Creating a market-driven organization. Sloan Management Review 41(1): 1122.
  • DeCarolis DM, Deeds DL. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 20(10): 953968.
  • Deeds DL, Hill CWL. 1996. Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: an empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing 11: 4155.
  • Dertouzos M, Lester R, Solow R and the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity. 1988. Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Devinney TM. 1992. New products and financial risk changes. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(3): 222231.
  • Dierickx I, Cool K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35(12): 15041513.
  • Dosi G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 11: 147162.
  • Dyer JH. 1996. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal 17(4): 271291.
  • Eisenhardt KM. 1990. Speed and strategic choice: how managers accelerate decision making. California Management Review 32(3): 3954.
  • Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 84110.
  • Ettlie JE. 1988. Taking Charge of Manufacturing: How Companies Are Combining Technological and Organizational Innovations to Compete Successfully. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
  • Ettlie JE. 1995. Product-process development integration in manufacturing. Management Science 41: 12241237.
  • Ettlie JE. 1997. Integrated design and new product success. Journal of Operations Management 15(1): 3355.
  • Ettlie JE, Reza EM. 1992. Organizational integration and product innovation. Academy of Management Journal 35: 795827.
  • Ettlie JE, Vellenga DB. 1979. The adoption time period for some transportation innovations. Management Science 25: 429443.
  • Gerwin D. 1993. Integrating manufacturing into the strategic phases of new product development. California Management Review 35(4): 123136.
  • Gil MJA, de la Fe PG. 1999. Strategic alliances, organisational learning and new product development: the cases of Rover and Seat. R&D Management 29(4): 391404.
  • Grant RM. 1991. The resource based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3): 114135.
  • Grant RM. 1998. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications (3rd edn). Basil Blackwell: Cambridge, MA.
  • Gupta Y, Somers T. 1996. Business strategy, manufacturing flexibility, and organizational performance relationships: a path analysis approach. Production and Operations Management 5: 204233.
  • Hitt M, Hoskisson RE, Nixon RD. 1993. A mid-range theory of interfunctional integration its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 10: 161185.
  • Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Johnson RA, Moesel D. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal 39: 10841119.
  • Hitt MA, Ireland RD. 1985. Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Management Journal 6(3): 273293.
  • Iansiti M. 1995. Science-based product development: an empirical study of the mainframe computer industry. Product and Operations Management 4(4): 335359.
  • Iansiti M, West J. 1997. Turning great research into great products. Harvard Business Review 75(3): 6979.
  • Iansiti M, Clark KB. 1994. Integration and dynamic capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(3): 557605.
  • Jelinek M, Goldhar JD. 1983. The interface between strategy and manufacturing technology. Columbia Journal of World Business 18(1): 2636.
  • Kahn KB. 1996. Interdepartmental integration: a definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13: 137151.
  • Kahn KB, McDonough III EF. 1997. An empirical study of the relationships among co-location, integration, performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 161178.
  • Kamath RR, Liker JK. 1994. A second look at Japanese product development. Harvard Business Review 72(6): 154170.
  • Klevornick AK, Levin RC, Nelson RR, Winter SG. 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24: 185205.
  • Kodama F. 1995. Emerging Patterns of Innovation: Sources of Japan's Technological Edge. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Kotabe M, Swan KS. 1995. The role of strategic alliances in high-technology new product development. Strategic Management Journal 16(8): 621636.
  • Lado AA, Wilson MC. 1994. Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review 19: 699727.
  • Lambe CJ, Spekman RE. 1997. Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 102116.
  • Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 615640.
  • Lee M, Na D. 1994. Determinants of technical success in product development when innovative radicalness is considered. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11: 6268.
  • Lei D, Hitt MA, Bettis R. 1996. Dynamic core competencies through meta-learning and strategic context. Journal of Management 22: 549569.
  • Leonard-Barton D. 1992. The factory as a learning laboratory. Sloan Management Review 34(1): 2338.
  • Leonard-Barton D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Mitchell W, Singh K. 1996. Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal 17(3): 169195.
  • Mosakowski E. 1991. Organizational boundaries and economic performance: an empirical study of entrepreneurial computer firms. Strategic Management Journal 12(2): 115133.
  • Narin F, Noma E, Perry R. 1987. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy 16(2–4): 143155.
  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Podsakoff PM, Organ D. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12(4): 531544.
  • Priem RL, Butler JE. 2001. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review 26: 2240.
  • Quinn JB, Hilmer FG. 1994. Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review 35(4): 4355.
  • Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Scannell TV. 1997. Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 190202.
  • Rauscher TG, Smith PG. 1995. From experience: time-driven development of software in manufactured goods. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12: 186199.
  • Rosenau MD Jr. 2001. Radical innovation: how mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18(4): 278279.
  • Sanchez R. 1995. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 16: 135159.
  • Schoonhoven CB, Eisenhardt KM, Lyman K. 1990. Speeding products to market: waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 177207.
  • Siegel RA, Hansen S-O, Pellas LH. 1995. Accelerating the commercialization of technology: commercialization through co-operation. Industrial Management 95(1): 1826.
  • Simonin BL. 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 20(7): 595623.
  • Singh H, Mitchell W. 1996. Precarious collaboration: business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 17: 99115.
  • Snell SA, Dean Jr. JW. 1992. Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35: 467504.
  • Song XM, Souder WE, Dyer B. 1997. A causal model of the impact of skills, synergy, and design sensitivity on new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 88101.
  • Stalk G Jr., Hout TM. 1990. Competing against time: how time based strategies give technological innovators the competitive edge. Research-Technology Management 33(2): 1924.
  • Stalk G, Evans P, Shulman LE. 1992. Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 70(2): 5769.
  • Steensma HK, Corley KG. 2001. Organizational context as a moderator of theories on firm boundaries for technology sourcing. Academy of Management Journal 44(2): 271291.
  • Stevens G, Burley J, Divine R. 1999. Creativity (plus) business discipline (equals) higher profits faster from new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16: 455468.
  • Teece DJ. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285306.
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509533.
  • White GP. 1996. A meta-analysis model of manufacturing capabilities. Journal of Operations Management 14: 315331.
  • Whitney DE. 1988. Manufacturing by design. Harvard Business Review 66(4): 8391.
  • Williamson OE. 1999. Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 20(12): 10871108.
  • Yeoh P-L, Roth K. 1999. An empirical analysis of sustained advantage in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry: impact of firm resources and capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20(7): 637653.
  • Zahra S. 1996. Technology strategy and company performance: examining the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing 11(3): 189219.
  • Zahra SA, Covin JG. 1993. Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 14(6): 451478.
  • Zahra S, George G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, in press.