Article
The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research
Article first published online: 7 NOV 2006
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250030303
Copyright © 1982 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Armstrong, J. S. (1982), The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research. Strat. Mgmt. J., 3: 197–211. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250030303
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 NOV 2006
- Article first published online: 7 NOV 2006
- Manuscript Revised: 15 JAN 1982
- Manuscript Received: 22 APR 1981
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
A review of research from organizational behaviour supported the guidelines by corporate planners: that is, use an explicit approach for setting objectives, generating strategies, evaluating strategies, monitoring results, and obtaining commitment. To determine whether these findings could be applied to strategic decision making in organizations, a review was made of all published field research on the evaluation of formal planning. Formal planning was superior in 10 of the 15 comparisons drawn from 12 studies, while informal planning was superior in only two comparisons. Although this research did not provide sufficient information on the use of various aspects of the planning process, mild support was provided for having participation by stakeholders. Formal planning tended to be more useful where large changes were involved, but, beyond that, little information was available to suggest when formal planning is most valuable. Future research should assess the formal planning process, the situation in which it is used, and its effects on the total system.
1097-0266/asset/SMJ_left.gif?v=1&s=0d6b7d5b0826e7c6cbdc29281df4411fc6c72458)
1097-0266/asset/SMJ_right.gif?v=1&s=ba55ab6eb3917554fae90dca0fae6a736025dd01)
1097-0266/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=f21741be70afec8fda7a78364d0bbf96e0cb833f)