SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6): 639656.
  • Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 425455.
  • Alcacer J, Gittelman M. 2004. How do I know what you know? Patent examiners and the generation of patent citations. SSRN working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=548 003. August 2005.
  • Anderson P, Tushman ML. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(4): 604633.
  • Brown JS, Duguid P. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review 20(2): 343378.
  • Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt KLR. 2001. Knowledge specialization and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly 46(4): 597621.
  • Cassiman B, Veugelers R. 2002. Spillovers and R&D cooperation: some empirical evidence. American Economic Review 92(4): 11691184.
  • Chesbrough H. 2003a. Open Innovation. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Chesbrough H. 2003b. The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review Summer: 3541.
  • Chesbrough H, Tucci CL. 2004. Corporate venture capital in the context of corporate innovation. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development, Elsinore, Denmark.
  • Christensen C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Cohen WM. 1995. Empirical studies of innovative activity. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, StonemanP (ed). Blackwell: Oxford; 342365.
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. 1989. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99:(September): 569596.
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128152.
  • Dasgupta P, David P. 1994. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23(5): 487522.
  • DTI. 2003a. U.K. Innovation Survey. Department of Trade and Industry, London (www.dti.gov.uk). October 2004.
  • DTI. 2003b. 3rd Community Innovation Survey. Department of Trade and Industry, London. http://www.dti.gov.uk/iese/cis_quest.pdf. October 2004.
  • Filippucci C, Drudi I, Papalia RB. 1996. Testing the relevance of Tobin's approach for modelling consumption. Economic Notes 25(2): 225247.
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy 30: 10191039.
  • Freeman C, Soete LLG. 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter: London.
  • Garcia R, Calantone R. 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19: 110132.
  • Greene WH. 2000. Econometric Analysis (4th edn). Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Henderson R, Clark KB. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 930.
  • Kaiser U. 2002. An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 747774.
  • Katila R. 2002. New product search over time: past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal 45: 9951010.
  • Katila R, Ahuja G. 2002. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45(8): 11831194.
  • Katz R, Allen T. 1982. Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D projects. R&D Management 12(1): 719.
  • Klevorick AK, Levin RC, Nelson RR, Winter SG. 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24(2): 185205.
  • Koput KW. 1997. A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions. Organization Science 8(5): 528542.
  • Laursen K, Foss N. 2003. New HRM practices, complementarities, and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27(2): 243263.
  • Laursen K, Salter AJ. 2003. Searching low and high: why do firms cite universities as a source of innovation? Paper presented at the EMAEE 2003 Conference on the ‘Knowledge-Based Economies: New Challenges in Methodology, Theory and Policy’, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Leiponen A, Helfat CE. 2003. Innovation objectives, knowledge sources and the benefit of breadth. Paper presented at the What Do We Know About Innovation Conference: A Conference in Honour of Keith Pavitt, Freeman Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
  • Levin R, Klevorick A, Nelson RR, Winter S. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (3): 783820.
  • Levinthal DA, March JG. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 14: 95112.
  • LundvallB-Å (ed.). 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter: London.
  • Mairesse J, Mohnen P. 2002. Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: an illustrative framework and an application. American Economic Review 92(2): 226231.
  • March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organization Science 2(1): 7187.
  • Marsili O, Salter AJ. 2005. Is innovation democratic? Skewed distributions and the returns to innovation in Dutch manufacturing. Economics of New Technology and Innovation 14(1–2): 83102.
  • Metcalfe JS. 1994. The economics of evolution and the economics of technology policy. Economic Journal 104: 931944.
  • NelsonRR (ed.). 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Nelson RR, Winter S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Ocasio W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 18: 187206.
  • OECD. 1997. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data: the ‘Oslo Manual’. Organization for Economic Development and Co-operation, Paris.
  • Papalia RB, Di Iorio F. 2001. Alternative error term specification in the Log-Tobit model. In Advances in Classification and Data Analysis, SBorra, RRocci, MSchader, MVichi (eds). Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg; 185192.
  • Patel P, Pavitt KLR. 1997. The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy 26(2): 141156.
  • Pavitt KLR. 1998. Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith Tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't. Industrial and Corporate Change 7: 433452.
  • Pavitt KLR, Robson M, Townsend J. 1987. The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945–1983. Journal of Industrial Economics 35(3): 297316.
  • Pavitt KLR, Robson M, Townsend J. 1989. Accumulation, diversification and organization of technological activities in U.K. companies, 1945–83. Management Science 35: 8199.
  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the local of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116145.
  • Riggs W, von Hippel E. 1996. The impact of scientific and commercial value of the sources of scientific instruments innovation. Research Policy 23: 459469.
  • Rosenberg N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K..
  • Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A. 2001. Beyond local research: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal 22(4): 287306.
  • Rothwell R, Freeman C, Jervis P, Robertson A, Townsend J. 1974. SAPPHO updated: Project SAPPHO Phase 2. Research Policy 3(3): 258291.
  • Sakkab NY. 2002. Connect and develop complements research and develop at P&G. Research-Technology Management 45(2): 3845.
  • Schumpeter JA. 1942/87. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Unwin: London.
  • Scott C, Brown JS. 1999. Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10(4): 381400.
  • Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B. 1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 15(5): 387394.
  • Shane S. 2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, U.K..
  • Simon HA. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization. Macmillan: Chicago, IL.
  • Spencer JW. 2001. How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States–Japan comparison. Academy of Management Journal 44(2): 432440.
  • Stockdale B. 2002. U.K. Innovation Survey, Department of Trade and Industry, London. http://www.dti.gov.uk/iese/ecotrends.pdf. October 2004.
  • Szulanski G. 1996. Exploiting internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 2743.
  • Teece DJ. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285305.
  • Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt KLR. 2000. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change (2nd edn). Wiley: Chichester.
  • Tushman ML, Anderson P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439465.
  • Urban GL, von Hippel E. 1988. Lead user analysis for development of new industrial products. Management Science 34(5): 569582.
  • Utterback JM. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • von Hippel E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Zucker L, Darby M, Brewer M. 1998. Intellectual capital and the birth of the U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review 88: 290306.