SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Xiaojun Hu, Ronald Rousseau, A simple approach to describe a company’s innovative activities and their technological breadth, Scientometrics, 2015, 102, 2, 1401

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Mauricio Jara-Bertin, Félix J. López-Iturriaga, Christian Espinosa, Diversification and control in emerging markets: The case of Chilean firms, BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 2015,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Liang-Hung Lin, Innovation performance of Taiwanese information firms: an acquisition–learning–innovation framework, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2015, 26, 1-2, 29

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Alfredo Jiménez, Diana Benito-Osorio, Carmen Palmero-Cámara, Learning from Risky Environments: Global Diversification Strategies of Spanish MNEs, Management International Review, 2015,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Olivier Bertrand, Laurence Capron, Productivity enhancement at home via cross-border acquisitions: The roles of learning and contemporaneous domestic investments, Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36, 5
  6. 6
    S. Lodh, M. R. Battaggion, Technological breadth and depth of knowledge in innovation: the role of mergers and acquisitions in biotech, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2015, 24, 2, 383

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Gabriel de la Fuente, Pilar Velasco, The effect of the financial crisis on the value of corporate diversification in Spanish firms, Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 2015, 44, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Diana Benito-Osorio, Alberto Colino, José Ángel Zúñiga-Vicente, The link between product diversification and performance among Spanish manufacturing firms: Analyzing the role of firm size, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 2015, 32, 1
  9. 9
    Marc Gruber, Sung Min Kim, Jan Brinckmann, What is an Attractive Business Opportunity? An Empirical Study of Opportunity Evaluation Decisions by Technologists, Managers, and Entrepreneurs, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2015, 9, 1
  10. 10
    Elitsa R. Banalieva, Kimberly A. Eddleston, Thomas M. Zellweger, When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view, Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36, 6
  11. 11
    Niron Hashai, Within-industry diversification and firm performance—an S-shaped hypothesis, Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36, 6
  12. 12
    David J. Teece, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015,

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Minyoung Kim, I. Kim Wang, Dynamic product differentiation strategies: an examination of the interplay of firm and industry characteristics, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2014, 26, 8, 959

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Jonathan P. O'Brien, Parthiban David, Toru Yoshikawa, Andrew Delios, How capital structure influences diversification performance: A transaction cost perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35, 7
  15. 15
    Yunhao Chen, Antoinette L. Smith, Jian Cao, Weidong Xia, Information Technology Capability, Internal Control Effectiveness, and Audit Fees and Delays, Journal of Information Systems, 2014, 28, 2, 149

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Manish K. Srivastava, André O. Laplume, Matching technology strategy with knowledge structure: Impact on firm's Tobin's q in the semiconductor industry, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2014, 33, 93

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Ke-Chiun Chang, Chien-Chung Yuan, Chang-Liang Lin, Wei Zhou, Nonlinear Effect of Technological Diversification on the Corporate Patent Performance, Journal of Applied Sciences, 2014, 14, 3, 273

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Yuandi Wang, Lutao Ning, Jin Chen, Product diversification through licensing: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms, European Management Journal, 2014, 32, 4, 577

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Liang-Hung Lin, Subsidiary performance: The contingency of multinational corporation’s international strategy, European Management Journal, 2014, 32, 6, 928

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Ludovic Dibiaggio, Maryam Nasiriyar, Lionel Nesta, Substitutability and complementarity of technological knowledge and the inventive performance of semiconductor companies, Research Policy, 2014, 43, 9, 1582

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Kerstin Lopatta, Thomas Kaspereit, The cross-section of returns, benchmark model parameters, and idiosyncratic volatility of nuclear energy firms after Fukushima Daiichi, Energy Economics, 2014, 41, 125

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Suk Bong Choi, Christopher Williams, The impact of innovation intensity, scope, and spillovers on sales growth in Chinese firms, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2014, 31, 1, 25

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    M. Nasiriyar, L. Nesta, L. Dibiaggio, The moderating role of the complementary nature of technological resources in the diversification-performance relationship, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2014, 23, 5, 1357

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Tyler Wry, Michael Lounsbury, Contextualizing the categorical imperative: Category linkages, technology focus, and resource acquisition in nanotechnology entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 2013, 28, 1, 117

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Hyung-Deok Shin, Hun Lee, Disentangling the role of knowledge similarity on the choice of alliance structure, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2013, 30, 4, 350

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Mark Humphery-Jenner, Diversification in Private Equity Funds: On Knowledge Sharing, Risk Aversion, and Limited Attention, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2013, 48, 05, 1545

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Nicoletta Corrocher, Laura Lasio, Diversification strategies in network-based services: The case of mobile virtual network operators, Telecommunications Policy, 2013, 37, 11, 1110

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Yi-Min Chen, Feng-Jyh Lin, Do financially innovative futures matter?, The Service Industries Journal, 2013, 33, 9-10, 941

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Yi-Min Chen, De-Hsin Yang, Feng-Jyh Lin, Does technological diversification matter to firm performance? The moderating role of organizational slack, Journal of Business Research, 2013, 66, 10, 1970

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Kwangmin Park, SooCheong (Shawn) Jang, Effects of within-industry diversification and related diversification strategies on firm performance, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2013, 34, 51

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Marc Gruber, Ian C. MacMillan, James D. Thompson, Escaping the Prior Knowledge Corridor: What Shapes the Number and Variety of Market Opportunities Identified Before Market Entry of Technology Start-ups?, Organization Science, 2013, 24, 1, 280

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Suk Bong Choi, Christopher Williams, Innovation and firm performance in Korea and China: a cross-context test of mainstream theories, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2013, 25, 4, 423

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Jongtae Shin, Hyun Shin, Institutional ownership and technological relatedness: A test of endogeneity, Journal of Business Research, 2013, 66, 11, 2279

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Talli Zahavi, Dovev Lavie, Intra-industry diversification and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34, 8
  35. 35
    Alex Medina Giacomozzi, Elba Amalia Mardones Mardones, Jonathan Mercado Pérez, Relación entre el rendimiento y las estrategias de crecimiento en las sociedades anónimas chilenas, Estudios Gerenciales, 2013, 29, 127, 204

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Sang Kyun Kim, Jonathan D. Arthurs, Arvin Sahaym, John B. Cullen, Search behavior of the diversified firm: The impact of fit on innovation, Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34, 8
  37. 37
    Manuel Villasalero, Signaling, spillover and learning effects of knowledge flows on division performance within related diversified firms, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2013, 17, 6, 928

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Stefan Hauschild, Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, The resource-based view of diversification success: conceptual issues, methodological flaws, and future directions, Review of Managerial Science, 2013, 7, 3, 327

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Burak Dindaroglu, Industrial Dynamics, Innovation Policy, and Economic Growth through Technological Advancements, 2013,

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Diana Benito-Osorio, Luis Ángel Guerras-Martín, José Ángel Zuñiga-Vicente, Four decades of research on product diversification: a literature review, Management Decision, 2012, 50, 2, 325

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Pao-Lien Chen, Charles Williams, Rajshree Agarwal, Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency, Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33, 3
  42. 42
    Liang-Hung Lin, Innovation performance of Taiwanese information firms: An acquisition–learning–innovation framework, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2012, 23, 9-10, 1135

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Jee-Hae Lim, Theophanis C. Stratopoulos, Tony S. Wirjanto, Role of IT executives in the firm's ability to achieve competitive advantage through IT capability, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2012, 13, 1, 21

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Aseem Kaul, Technology and Corporate Scope: Firm and Rival Innovation as Antecedents of Corporate Transactions, Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33, 4
  45. 45
    Chinho Lin, Ya-Jung Wu, ChiaChi Chang, Weihan Wang, Cheng-Yu Lee, The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances—the absorptive capacity perspective, Technovation, 2012, 32, 5, 282

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Mario I. Kafouros, Peter J. Buckley, Jeremy Clegg, The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises: The role of international depth and breadth, Research Policy, 2012, 41, 5, 848

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Yu-Shan Chen, Chun-Yu Shih, Ching-Hsun Chang, The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, Scientometrics, 2012, 92, 1, 117

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Jeffrey S. Harrison, Joseph E. Coombs, The Moderating Effects from Corporate Governance Characteristics on the Relationship Between Available Slack and Community-Based Firm Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 107, 4, 409

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Yu-Shan Chen, Ke-Chiun Chang, Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance, Scientometrics, 2012, 90, 3, 825

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Heng-Yih Liu, Chia-Wen Hsu, Antecedents and consequences of corporate diversification, Management Decision, 2011, 49, 9, 1510

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Almudena Martínez-Campillo, Roberto Fernández-Gago, Diversification strategy, CEO management style and firm performance: an application of Heckman’s two-stage method, Quality & Quantity, 2011, 45, 1, 59

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Alex Medina Giacomozzi, Miguel Hernández Morales, Estrategia de mercado seguida por los grupos económicos en chile: efecto en el rendimiento y la rentabilidad1, Estudios Gerenciales, 2011, 27, 119, 187

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    Changling Chen, Jee-Hae Lim, Theophanis C. Stratopoulos, IT Capability and a Firm's Ability to Recover from Losses: Evidence from the Economic Downturn of the Early 2000s, Journal of Information Systems, 2011, 25, 2, 117

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Breandán Ó Huallacháin, Der-Shiuan Lee, Technological Specialization and Variety in Urban Invention, Regional Studies, 2011, 45, 1, 67

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Hsien-Che Lai, Yi-Chia Chiu, Yi-Ching Liaw, Can external corporate venturing broaden firm's technological scope? The role of complementary assets, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2010, 27, 3-4, 183

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    John K. Christiansen, Claus J. Varnes, Marta Gasparin, Diana Storm-Nielsen, Erik Johnsen Vinther, Living Twice: How a Product Goes through Multiple Life Cycles, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27, 6
  57. 57
    César Alonso-Borrego, Francisco Javier Forcadell, Related diversification and R&D intensity dynamics, Research Policy, 2010, 39, 4, 537

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Jongtae Shin, David Jalajas, Technological relatedness, boundary-spanning combination of knowledge and the impact of innovation: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2010, 21, 2, 87

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    Yi-Chia Chiu, Hsien-Che Lai, Yi-Ching Liaw, Tai-Yu Lee, Technological scope: diversified or specialized, Scientometrics, 2010, 82, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Yi-Min Chen, The continuing debate on firm performance: A multilevel approach to the IT sectors of Taiwan and South Korea, Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63, 5, 471

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    A. Martínez Campillo, R. Fernández Gago, ¿QUÉ FACTORES DETERMINAN LA DECISIÓN DE DIVERSIFICAR? EL CASO DE LAS EMPRESAS ESPAÑOLAS (1997–2001), Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 2009, 15, 1, 15

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    D. Benito Osorio, ANÁLISIS TEÓRICO DE LA RELACIÓN ENTRE DIVERSIFICACIÓN CORPORATIVA Y RESULTADOS EMPRESARIALES, Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 2009, 15, 2, 105

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Luz Sánchez-Peinado, Martina Menguzzato-Boulard, Antecedents of entry mode choice when diversifying, Industrial Marketing Management, 2009, 38, 8, 971

    CrossRef

  64. 64
    Fabian Homberg, Katja Rost, Margit Osterloh, Do synergies exist in related acquisitions? A meta-analysis of acquisition studies, Review of Managerial Science, 2009, 3, 2, 75

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Hyukjoon Kim, Hyojeong Lim, Yongtae Park, How should firms carry out technological diversification to improve their performance? An analysis of patenting of Korean firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2009, 18, 8, 757

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    Michael K. McShane, Larry A. Cox, Issuance Decisions and Strategic Focus: The Case of Long-Term Care Insurance, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2009, 76, 1
  67. 67
    Ulrich Lichtenthaler, RETRACTED: Product business, foreign direct investment, and licensing: Examining their relationships in international technology exploitation, Journal of World Business, 2009, 44, 4, 407

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Ulrich Lichtenthaler, RETRACTED: The role of corporate technology strategy and patent portfolios in low-, medium- and high-technology firms, Research Policy, 2009, 38, 3, 559

    CrossRef

  69. 69
    M.V. Shyam Kumar, The relationship between product and international diversification: the effects of short-run constraints and endogeneity, Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30, 1
  70. 70
    Erik Døving, Paul N. Gooderham, Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: the case of small firm accountancy practices, Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29, 8
  71. 71
    Marc Gruber, Ian C. MacMillan, James D. Thompson, Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms, Management Science, 2008, 54, 9, 1652

    CrossRef

  72. 72
    Bertram Tan, Hae-Ching Chang, Chen-Kuo Lee, Relationships among industry environment, diversification motivations and corporate performance, International Journal of Commerce and Management, 2008, 17, 4, 326

    CrossRef

  73. 73
    Yi-Chia Chiu, Hsien-Che Lai, Tai-Yu Lee, Yi-Ching Liaw, Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008, 75, 6, 875

    CrossRef

  74. 74
    Lee Li, Peggy Ng, Brian Gaber, Determinants of small trading companies' performance in high-tech industries, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 2007, 26, 5
  75. 75
    Peter Hom, Katalin Takacs Haynes, 2007,

    CrossRef