Sustainable Organizations: A Simple Matter of Evidence
Version of Record online: 3 JUL 2012
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Volume 30, Issue 1, pages 98–101, January/February 2013
How to Cite
Emery, M. (2013), Sustainable Organizations: A Simple Matter of Evidence. Syst. Res., 30: 98–101. doi: 10.1002/sres.2123
- Issue online: 14 JAN 2013
- Version of Record online: 3 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 7 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Received: 30 JUL 2011
- chaordic systems thinking (CST);
- logical fallacies;
- open systems theory (OST);
- socio-technical systems (STS);
In this note, I analyse the latest response by Kira and van Eijnatten in which they claim that fundamentally different ways of looking at reality and profound differences in worldview play a role in this current debate. Their response has three elements, a repetition of their position and two appeals, to authority and to a majority. By basing their response on logical fallacies, their latest note, plus the history of this debate, shows that the real difference is between an approach based on acceptable standards for scientific practices and evidence and one which is not. As evidence takes precedence over fallacies, I pose a question for Kira and van Eijnatten—do they believe the evidence I have presented? I look forward to their answer. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.