SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Carroll GR, Goodstein J, Gyenes A. 1988. Organizations and the state: Effects of the institutional environment on agricultural cooperatives in Hungary. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 233256.
  • Dent EB, Holt CG. 2001. CAS in war, bureaucratic machine in peace: The U.S. Air Force example. Emergence 3: 90107.
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 2002. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In Contemporary Sociological Theory, Calhoun C, Gerteis J, Moody J, Pfaff S, Virk I. (eds.). Blackwell: Malden, MA.
  • Dubin R. 1978. Theory building. The Free Press: New York.
  • Friedman K. 2003. Theory construction in design research: Criteria: Approaches, and methods. Design Studies 24: 507522.
  • Friendshuh L, Troncale L. 2012. SoSPT 1.: Identifying fundamental systems processes for a general theory of systems. International Society for Systems Sciences (ISSS). San Jose, CA, USA.
  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R. 2006. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal 49: 2748.
  • Harder J, Robertson PJ, Woodward H. 2004. The spirit of the new workplace: Breathing life into organizations. Organization Development Journal 22: 79103.
  • Hjørland B. 2002. Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation 58: 422462.
  • Hull DL. 1988. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  • James EH, Wooten LP. 2006. Diversity Crisis: How firms manage discrimination lawsuits. Academy of Management Journal 49: 11031118.
  • Kaplan A. 1964. The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. Chandler Publishing Company: San Francisco.
  • Lakatos I. 1970. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Lakatos I, Musgrave A. (eds.). Cambridge university Press: New York.
  • Lewin A, Volberda HW. 2005. The future of organizational studies: Beyond the selection-adaptation debate. In The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, Tsoukas H, Knudsen C. (eds.). Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Lichtenstein BMB. 2000. Emergence as a process of self-organizing: New assumptions and insights from the study of non-linear dynamic systems. Journal of Organizational Change Management 13: 526544.
  • Lin K. 2012. Five neo-disciplines for leading organizations' generative development toward global sustainability. International Society for Systems Sciences (ISSS). San Jose, CA, USA.
  • Meyer JW. 2001. Globalization, national culture, and the future of the world polity. Wei Lun Lecture. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • Mezias SJ, Scarselletta M. 1994. Resolving financial reporting problems: An institutional analysis of the process. Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 654678.
  • Oberschall A. 2000. Oberschall reviews " Theory and Progress in Social Science" by James B. Rule. Social Forces 78: 11881191.
  • Ocasio W. 1999. Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 384416.
  • Palmer DA, Biggart NW. 2002. Organizational institutions. In The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Baum JAC. (ed.). Blackwell: Oxford, UK.
  • Pentland BT. 1999. Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review 24: 711724.
  • Reay T, Golden-Biddle K, Germann K. 2006. Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal 49: 977998.
  • Romm NRA. 2001. Accountability in Social Research: Issues and Debates. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers: New York.
  • Scott WR. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 493511.
  • Scott WR. 2005. Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, Smith BJ, Hitt MA. (eds.). Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Selznick P. 1996. Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 270277.
  • Sobel I. 1982. Human capital and institutional theories of the labor market: Rivals of complements? Journal of Economic Issues 16: 255272.
  • Stinchcombe AL. 1987. Constructing social theories. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  • Suddaby R, Greenwood R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 3567.
  • Wallis SE. 2008. From reductive to robust: Seeking the core of complex adaptive systems theory. In Intelligent complex adaptive systems, Yang A, Shan Y. (eds.). IGI Publishing: Hershey, PA.
  • Wallis SE. 2010a. The structure of theory and the structure of scientific revolutions: What constitutes an advance in theory? In Cybernetics and systems theory in management: Views, tools, and advancements, Wallis SE. (ed.). IGI Global: Hershey, PA.
  • Wallis SE. 2010b. Toward a science of metatheory. Integral Review 6.
  • Wallis SE. 2011. Avoiding policy failure: A workable approach. Emergent Publications: Litchfield Park, AZ.
  • Wallis SE. 2012. Existing and emerging methods for integrating theories within and between disciplines. International Society for Systems Sciences (ISSS). San Jose, CA, USA.
  • Zilber TB. 2006. The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israel high tech. Academy of Management Journal 49: 281303.
  • Zucker LG. 1989. Institutional theory and population ecology" No legitimacy, no history. American Sociological Review 54: 542548.
  • Zucker L, Darby M. 2005. An evolutionary approach to institutions and social construction. In Great minds in management: The process of theory development, Smith BJ, Hitt MA. (eds.). Oxford University Press: New York.