SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Experimental models;
  • Neural stem cells;
  • Cell transplantation;
  • Lymphocytes

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

Transplantation of syngeneic neural progenitor cells (NPCs) into mice persistently infected with the JHM strain of mouse hepatitis virus (JHMV) results in enhanced differentiation into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells that is associated with remyelination, axonal sparing, and clinical improvement. Whether allogeneic NPCs are tolerated or induce immune-mediated rejection is controversial and poorly defined under neuroinflammatory demyelinating conditions. We have used the JHMV-induced demyelination model to evaluate the antigenicity of transplanted allogeneic NPCs within the central nervous system (CNS) of mice with established immune-mediated demyelination. Cultured NPCs constitutively expressed the costimulatory molecules CD80/CD86, and IFN-γ treatment induced expression of MHC class I and II antigens. Injection of allogeneic C57BL/6 NPCs (H-2b background) led to a delayed type hypersensitivity response in BALB/c (H-2d background) mice associated with T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion following coculture with allogeneic NPCs. Transplantation of MHC-mismatched NPCs into JHMV-infected mice resulted in increased transcripts encoding the T-cell chemoattractant chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 that correlated with increased T-cell infiltration that was associated with NPC rejection. Treatment of MHC-mismatched mice with T-cell subset-specific depleting antibodies increased survival of allogeneic NPCs without affecting commitment to an oligodendrocyte lineage. Collectively, these results show that allogeneic NPCs are antigenic, and T-cells contribute to rejection following transplantation into an inflamed CNS suggesting that immunomodulatory treatments may be necessary to prolong survival of allogeneic cells. STEM CELLS2012;30:2584–2595


INTRODUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults [1]. The etiology of MS is thought to be multifactorial including genetic and environmental factors that may lead to initiation, maintenance and/or progression of disease [2]. For example, viral infection has long been considered a potential triggering mechanism involved in demyelination, and numerous human viral pathogens have been suggested to be involved in eliciting myelin-reactive lymphocytes and/or antibodies that subsequently infiltrate the central nervous system (CNS) and damage the myelin sheath [3–6]. Therefore, viral models of demyelination are clearly relevant and have provided important insight into mechanisms associated with disease initiation, neuroinflammation, demyelination, and remyelination. An important clinical aspect related to the pathogenesis of MS is the eventual remyelination failure in chronic demyelinated plaques by endogenous oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) [7–9]. With this in mind, cell-based therapies using neural progenitor cells (NPCs) have emerged as a potentially viable approach for promoting remyelination [10, 11]. Our laboratory has recently demonstrated that transplantation of syngeneic mouse NPCs into mice persistently infected with the neurotropic JHM strain of mouse hepatitis virus (JHMV) is well tolerated and is associated with axonal sparing accompanied by extensive remyelination while not significantly dampening either neuroinflammation or T-cell responses [12, 13]. Evident from this work is the ability of engrafted NPCs to (a) migrate to and colonize regions of demyelination by responding to the chemokine ligand CXCL12 [14], (b) preferentially differentiate into cells of an oligodendrocyte linage [12, 14], and (c) promote axonal sparing and remyelination [12].

NPC transplantation offers a promising therapeutic approach for promoting remyelination in patients with demyelinating disease such as MS. However, similar to solid-organ transplantation, donor-specific allogeneic responses are likely to occur that may require life-long immunosuppression that elevates susceptibility to opportunistic infections and tumors. Therefore, an important and clinically relevant question related to stem cell therapies revolves around the allograft rejection of implanted allogeneic stem cells as they may not be “self-derived.” This is particularly important when considering cellular transplantation for treatment of chronic neurodegenerative diseases as ongoing debate has centered on whether MHC matching is critical for successful engraftment into the CNS.compelling evidence argues that mismatched grafts are well-tolerated within the CNS due to muted immunogenicity of NPCs and clinical studies affirm that transplantation of allogeneic NPCs results in prolonged survival [15–17]. However, the immunoprivileged status of NPCs has recently been questioned [18], and more recent studies argue that MHC mismatching diminishes survival of NPCs and mutes endogenous neurogenesis, and this is associated with innate immune responses [19]. Moreover, transplantation of allogeneic NPCs in a model of spinal cord injury results in activation of the immune system and NPC rejection [20]. These findings indicate that in order for long-term engraftment of NPCs to be efficacious the use of immunomodulatory agents must be considered. With this in mind, it is imperative to determine if allogeneic NPCs are antigenic following transplantation into an environment with established inflammatory demyelinating disease. To this end, we provide evidence that allogeneic NPCs are recognized as foreign and infiltrating lymphocytes contribute to rejection following transplantation into JHMV-infected mice with established demyelination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

Animals and Virus

Age-matched (5–7 week) C57BL/6 (H-2b, National Cancer Institute [NCI], Frederick, MD) and BALB/c (H-2d, NCI) mice were infected intracranially (i.c.) with 150 (C57BL/6) or 15,000 (BALB/c) plaque forming units (PFU) of MHV strain J2.2v-1 (JHMV) in 30 μl sterile Hanks' balanced saline solution (HBSS) for transplantation studies or intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 2.50 × 105 PFU of the DM strain of JHMV suspended in 200 μl sterile HBSS for T-cell conditioned media (CM) preparation [14]. Mice were sacrificed at various days postinfection (p.i.), and spinal cords were removed and processed for analysis. All experiments were approved by the University of California, Irvine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Cell Culture, Reagents, and Transplantation

Enhanced green fluorescent protein expressing NPCs (GFP-NPCs), derived from C57BL/6 mice, were cultured as previously described [14]. Undifferentiated GFP-NPCs were transplanted (2.5 × 105 in 2.5 μl HBSS per mouse) at spinal cord T9 at day 14 p.i. into C57BL/6 (syngeneic) and BALB/c (allogeneic) mice. As previously published, this time point for transplantation was chosen since virus and inflammation has waned while demyelination has peaked [14]. As a sham control, virally infected mice were transplanted with HBSS alone [12]. Recombinant mouse Interferon (IFN) was purchased from Cell Sciences (Canton, MA, http://www.cellsciences.com).

Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction

A mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) is an in vitro method for assaying T-cell proliferation in response to alloantigen. Cells were isolated from four to five pooled spleens harvested from naïve and infected mice at day 21 p.t. Responding T-cell populations were purified by negative selection using a pan T-cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, http://www.miltenyibiotec.com) with an MS column, composed of ferromagnetic spheres capable of separating magnetically labeled and unlabeled cells when placed in the column attached to a magnet (Miltenyi Biotec). The loaded column was washed 5× with 3 ml HBSS to remove and collect all unlabeled cells. Cells were further separated into CD4+ and CD8+ populations by staining with PE-conjugated CD4 (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, http://www.bdbiosciences.com, clone GK1.5) and PE-Cy7-conjugated CD8 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, clone 53-6.6, http://www.ebioscience.com) antibodies and sorting with a FACSAria (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Aliquots of enriched T cells were stained for 8 minutes at room temperature with 5 μm eFluor670 (EF670) labeling dye (eBioscience), which has an excitation of 647 nm and is detected with an allophycocyanine (APC) filter. As cells divide, dye expression is dampened by being evenly distributed into daughter cells. After staining, cells were immediately washed 2× with PBS + 2% fetal calf serum. Stimulating populations of cells included control splenocytes and NPCs that were treated with 50 μg/ml mitomycin C (AG Scientific, San Diego, CA, http://www.agscientific.com) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Cells were washed 5× with 15 ml HBSS. 1 × 105 stimulators and 1 × 105 responders were plated together in a round bottom 96-well plate in the presence or absence of recombinant mouse IFN-γ (100 U/ml). Cocultures of cells were incubated for 5 days, and number of dividing responder T cells isolated from spleens of BALB/c mice at day 21 p.t. was compared to number of dividing responder T cells isolated from spleens of naïve BALB/c mice for statistical significance.

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Spot Assay

An enzyme linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay captures secreted proteins on a specific antibody-coated microplate and can be used to determine memory T-cell activation by detecting IFN-γ secretion. The frequency of alloreactive T cells was assessed by performing a 48 hour MLR with purified T cells in 96-well Multiscreen-IP plates (Millipore, Billerica, MA, http://www.millipore.com). Responder T cells were purified from the spleens of naïve BALB/c mice and BALB/c mice at day 21 p.t. by MACS sorting as described above. Stimulator cell populations were C57BL/6 splenocytes or GFP-NPCs. Stimulators and responders were incubated as previously described above with a minimum of six wells per experimental condition. Briefly, plates were coated with 4 μg/ml IFN-γ capture antibody (eBioscience, Clone AN-18) prior to MLR. Plates were washed with 0.01% Tween 20/PBS, followed by a 2-hour incubation at 37°C with 0.5 μg/ml biotinylated IFN-γ detection antibody (eBioscience, clone R4-6A2). Plates were washed with PBS/Tween 20 and incubated with 1:1,000 Streptavidin AP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, http://www.invitrogen.com) for 45 minutes at room temperature. Plates were washed with PBS only and then incubated with 100 μl per well of BCIP/NBT (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com) until spots developed. Spots were counted using a dissection microscope, and repeated measures ANOVA was performed for statistical analysis.

Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Assay

A delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) assay was used to determine if memory T cells were present in an antigen-sensitized animal. Naïve BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice were sensitized with a subcutaneous flank injection of C57BL/6 splenocytes (50 × 106 cells) or GFP-NPCs (15 × 106 cells) and 8 days later were challenged with a footpad injection of either 10 × 106 C57BL/6 splenocytes or 2.5 × 106 GFP-NPCs. Footpad swelling was measured at defined times post-footpad injection with a digital micrometer, and measurements were normalized to measurements from sham-sensitized mice. Alternatively, JHMV-infected BALB/c mice transplanted with GFP-NPCs were challenged at day 21 p.t. with a footpad injection of either 10 × 106 allogeneic splenocytes or 2.5 × 106 allogeneic GFP-NPCs, and footpad swelling was determined.

Histopathology

Animals were euthanized by inhalation of halothane (Sigma) and fixed by cardiac profusion. The spinal cord was extracted and processed for OCT and resin-embedded sections as previously described [12]. The number of GFP-positive cells was counted on at least two sections 80 μm apart from each tissue block for each animal. Counts from experimental mice were averaged and data are presented as average±SD. For immunofluorescent staining, rat-anti-platelet derived growth factor α (PDGFRα, 1.67 μg/ml; eBioscience) was used. Secondary antibody used for visualization was Alexa 594 goat anti-rat (Invitrogen). DAPI Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, http://www.southernbiotech.com) was used to visualize nuclei.

T-Cell CM

C57BL/6 mice were infected with an i.p. injection of 2.5 × 105 PFU of DM virus. At day 8 p.i., CD4 and CD8 T cells were isolated from spleen by negative selection followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to enrich for T-cell subsets. Antigen presenting cells (APCs) were isolated by collecting the column bound non-T-cells. Enriched APCs were treated with 50 μg/ml mitomycin-C (AG Scientific) and 35 × 106 APCs + 5 μm CD4 specific [membrane (M) glycoprotein spanning amino acid residues 133–147 (M133-147), Bio-Synthesis, Lewisville, TX, http://www.biosyn.com] or 5 μm CD8 specific [spike (S) glycoprotein spanning amino acid residues 510–518 (S510-518), Bio-Synthesis] viral peptide were cocultured with 35 × 106 CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in a 25 mm culture dish with 10 ml GFP-NPC media for 48 hours. Following incubation, CD4 and CD8 T-cell CM was administered to GFP-NPCs for 18, 24, or 42 hours.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA was extracted from homogenized spinal cord of JHMV-infected, NPC- or sham-transplanted C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice at days 1, 8, and 21 p.t., and cDNA was generated as previously described [21]. Quantitative real-time Taqman analysis for HPRT and eGFP with previously described primers and probes [22, 23] was performed using a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, http://www.bio-rad.com) iCycler instrument according to the manufacturer's instructions. Expression of eGFP was normalized to HPRT. Primers were purchased from Invitrogen, and the probe was purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, http://www.idtdna.com). Bio-Rad iQ Supermix was used for the reactions. Data were analyzed using the Bio-Rad iCycler iQ version 3.0a software and quantified using the relative expression software tool, version 2 [24]. The real-time SYBR green analysis for GAPDH, CD4, and CD8 was performed using previously described primers [25] with a Bio-Rad SYBR green kit on a Bio-Rad iCycler. The primers for CXCL9, CXCL10, and IFN-γ are: CXCL9 forward: TTT TCC TTT TGG GCA TCA TCT T, CXCL9 reverse: AGC ATC GTG CAT TCC TTA TCA CT; CXCL10 forward: TCA GCA CCA TGA ACC CAA G, CXCL10 reverse: CTA TGG CCC TCA TTC TCA CTG; IFN-γ forward: CTT TGG ACC CTC TGA CTT GAG, IFN-γ reverse: TCA ATG ACT GTG CCG TGG. CD4, CD8, CXCL9, CXCL10, and IFN-γ mRNA expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression.

Lymphocyte Enrichment from Spinal Cord

Cells were isolated from spinal cords from experimental mice as previously described [26–29]. Briefly, spinal cords were removed from PBS-perfused mice, and isolated tissue was ground with the rubber end of a 5-ml syringe plunger in a 100 mm petri dish, followed by vigorous trituration in 7 ml Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) medium. Single cell suspensions were centrifuged for 30 minutes at 1,200g at 4°C over a discontinuous percoll gradient at which point percoll and lipid layers were removed. Isolated cells were filtered, washed with 15 ml DMEM, centrifuged at 1,000g at 4°C, counted, and prepared for flow cytometry (see below). Cells isolated from spleens were used as positive controls.

Flow Cytometry

Lymphocytes isolated from the spinal cord were immunophenotyped with fluorescent antibodies (1:200) for the following cell surface markers: PE-conjugated CD4 (GK1.5; BD Biosciences) and PE-Cy7-conjugated CD8 (Ly-2; BD Biosciences). Appropriate isotype controls were used for each antibody. Cells were run on a FACStar flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) or LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, OR). NPCs were trypsinized with 0.05% trypsin (Invitrogen) and immunophenotyped with fluorescent antibodies (1:200) specific for the following cell surface markers: PE-conjugated MHC class I (eBioscience), MHC class II (BD Biosciences), CD80 (eBioscience), and CD86 (eBioscience). All cells for flow cytometry were FC blocked with anti-CD16/32 (1:200; BD Biosciences) for 20 minutes at 4°C.

Antibody Treatment

JHMV-infected mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) treated with 100 μg per mouse of either a depleting monoclonal antibody for CD4 (GK1.5, American Type Culture Collection [ATCC, Rockville, MD, http://www.atcc.org] TIB 207) or CD8 (Ly-2.2, 2.43, ATCC TIB 210), or control Rat IgG (Sigma) in 150 μl sterile saline at days −1, 1, 3, 5, 12, and 19 p.t. The initial time point was chosen to ensure that depletion occurs after viral clearance but begins prior to NPC transplantation. Delivery of antibody every other day allowed for efficient depletion of cells which was then switched to once a week for maintenance of cell depletion. These time points followed previously published guidelines [30]. Various concentrations were tested, and sufficient depletion as determined by flow analysis of spleen was achieved at 100 μg per mouse per time point.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by Student's t test, one-way ANOVA, or repeated measures ANOVA and p ≤ .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

NPCs Express MHC Class I and II in Response to IFN-γ Treatment

Cultured GFP-NPCs (derived from C57BL/6 mice, H-2b background) were treated with either medium alone or IFN-γ (100 U/ml), and expression of MHC class I and II antigens were measured by flow cytometry. Expression of both MHC class I and II antigens increased over time as determined by staining at 18, 24, and 42 hours post-treatment when compared to medium only-treated cultures (Fig. 1). Medium only-treated GFP-NPCs expressed < 1% MHC class I and II. The kinetics of expression in response to IFN-γ treatment were different between the two surface antigens with 89.9% ± 0.7% of cells expressing MHC class I by 18 hours and ultimately peaking to 99.5% ± 0.2% at 42 hours (Fig. 1A, 1B). In contrast, 2.2% ± 0.9% of IFN-γ-treated cells expressed detectable MHC class II by 18 hours and this reached 21.4% ± 0.6% by 42 hours (Fig. 1A, 1B). These data demonstrate that while cultured NPCs are capable of expressing both MHC class I and II, expression of MHC class I is markedly more rapid and robust when compared to MHC class II. Examination of CD80 and CD86 expression revealed that cultured NPCs constitutively expressed costimulatory molecules, and exposure to IFN-γ did not augment expression of either of these molecules (Fig. 1C, 1D). We next evaluated whether allogeneic NPCs could evoke a T-cell-mediated response. BALB/c mice (H-2d background) were immunized with splenocytes derived from C57BL/6 mice (H-2b background) and challenged via footpad injection (8 days post-immunization, p.i.) with either NPCs or splenocytes derived from either C57BL/6 mice or BALB/c mice. Within 24 hours postchallenge, immunized BALB/c mice exposed to MHC-mismatched NPCs or splenocytes displayed increased footpad swelling with splenocyte challenged mice displaying greater swelling (0.36 ± 0.12 mm, p < .01, n = 3) as compared to NPC challenged mice (0.18 ± 0.04 mm, p < .05, n = 3). By 48 hours, swelling had decreased in splenocyte-challenged mice yet increased in NPC-challenged animals (0.31 ± 0.02 mm, p < .01), indicating that although the memory response following splenocyte immunization was stronger against splenocytes than NPCs, NPCs were capable of inducing a memory T-cell response (Fig. 1E).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. GFP-NPCs express MHC antigens and are antigenic. Cultured GFP-NPCs were treated with IFN-γ (100 U/ml) for defined periods of time and MHC class I and II as well as CD80/86 determined by flow cytometry. (A): Representative flow analysis for MHC class I and II and (B) quantification of both class I and II induction. Data represent three independent experiments and data are shown as average ± SD. (C): Representative histogram for CD80/86 staining show that IFN-γ does not increase expression of costimulatory antigens. (D): Dual expression of MHC class II and CD80/86 on IFN-γ-treated (24 hours) GFP-NPCs. (E): BALB/c mice sensitized with a subcutaneous injection of C57BL/6 splenocytes were challenged with either GFP-NPCs or C57BL/6 splenocytes and footpad swelling was determined at 24 and 48 hours postinjection. Footpad swelling in experimental mice was compared to unsensitized but footpad challenged mice. Data presented represent three independent experiments and data are presented as average ± SD; *, p < .05; #, p < .01; **, p < .001. Abbreviations: FP, footpad; GFP, green fluorescent protein; IFN, interferon; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; NPC, neural progenitor cell; PE, phycoerythrin.

Download figure to PowerPoint

NPCs Express MHC Class I and II in Response to Treatment with CM from Antigen-Sensitized T Cells

CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated from the spleens of C57BL/6 mice at 8 days p.i. with JHMV. Enriched T-cell subsets were cocultured with APCs from uninfected C57BL/6 mice pulsed with viral peptides corresponding to the CD4-specific epitope within the membrane (M) glycoprotein spanning amino acid residues 133–147 (M133–147) or CD8-specific epitope within the spike (S) glycoprotein spanning amino acid residues 510–518 (S510–518) in order to stimulate virus-specific T cells. After 48 hours, media was collected, cultured GFP-NPCs were treated for defined periods of time, and expression of MHC class I and II was measured by flow cytometry. Similar to IFN-γ treatment, CM from antigen-sensitized CD4 and CD8 T cells induced MHC class I expression on cultured GFP-NPCs at 18, 24, and 42 hours (Fig. 2A, 2B). In addition, there was a significant increase in the frequency of MHC class II-positive NPCs following treatment with CM from viral peptide-stimulated populations of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells relative to IFN-γ treatment (Fig. 2A, 2B). While MHC class I expression was not appreciably increased on GFP-NPCs following incubation with CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell CM relative to IFN-γ, MFI analysis determined that the level of MHC class I expression per cell was increased approximately twofold compared to IFN-γ treatment, although this diminishes after prolonged exposure to IFN-γ (Fig. 2C, 2D). Conversely, while MHC class II was expressed a greater frequency of GFP-NPCs following incubation with CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell CM, the amount of MHC class II per cell was not appreciably increased. Although the MFI of MHC class II increased at the later time points relative to IFN-γ this was likely due to increased number of cells expressing MHC class II, as shown by the histogram in Figure 2C. These data demonstrate that antigen-sensitized CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are capable of inducing MHC class I and MHC II expression on NPCs, and the overall increased expression represents the presence of additional proinflammatory cytokines working synergistically with IFN-γ being secreted from virus-specific T cells.

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) express MHC class I and II in response to treatment with conditioned media from antigen sensitized T cells. CM was collected following exposure of T cells isolated from JHMV-immunized mice with defined CD4+ (M133-147) and CD8+ (S510-518) viral peptides for 48 hours. Cultured GFP-NPCs were treated with either CD4-CM, CD8-CM, IFN-γ (100 U/ml), or control media (untreated) for 18, 24, or 42 hours, and expression of MHC class I and II was determined by flow cytometry. (A): Representative flow analysis at one time point (42 hours) and (B) quantification of MHC I and II at 18, 24, and 42 hours. Statistics are calculated for MHC expression on GFP-NPCs following treatment with CD4 or CD8 CM relative to treatment with IFN-γ; *, p < .05; #, p < .01. (C): Representative histogram of MHC class I and II expression at 18, 24, and 42 hours. (D): The MFI for MHC I and II expression on GFP-NPCs following incubation with CD4 or CD8 CM was determined and divided by the MFI for MHC I and II following IFN-γ treatment to determine the fold increase in MFI. Abbreviations: CM, conditioned media; GFP, green fluorescent protein; IFN, interferon; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Allogeneic NPCs are Rejected Following Transplantation into JHMV-Infected Mice

Infection of susceptible mice with JHMV induces an acute encephalomyelitis followed by an immune-mediated demyelinating disease that results in clinical and histological disease with similarities to the human demyelinating disease MS [26, 31–34]. C57BL/6 (H-2b background) and BALB/c (H-2d background) mice were infected i.c. with JHMV and subsequently transplanted by intraspinal injection with GFP-NPCs (H-2b background) at day 14 p.i., which represents a time in which demyelination is established [12, 13, 14, 35]. Recipient mice were not treated with any immunomodulatory drugs and animals were sacrificed at 8 days and 3 weeks p.t. Survival of engrafted cells determined by visualizing expression of GFP from transplanted cells [14] and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of GFP mRNA transcripts. Syngeneic transplant of GFP-NPCs into infected C57BL/6 mice resulted in extensive migration along the spinal cord both rostral and caudal to implantation site and preferentially colonized within areas of white matter damage (Fig. 3A). Conversely, allogeneic GFP-NPCs, transplanted into JHMV-infected BALB/c mice, were detected at day 8 p.t. but not at day 21 p.t. (Fig. 3B). Quantification of transplanted cells, as determined by counting GFP-positive cells in defined areas rostral and caudal to the implantation site, revealed a significant difference in the number of GFP-NPCs present in the spinal cords of syngeneic transplanted mice compared to allogeneic transplanted mice at day 21 p.t. (Fig. 3C). Further, determination of GFP expression by mRNA by quantitative PCR revealed a >180-fold decrease in signal intensity in allogeneic transplant at day 21 p.t. relative to day 1 p.t. as compared to syngeneic recipients in which there was an approximately ninefold increase (p ≤ .001) in GFP transcript levels at day 21 p.t. relative to day 1 p.t., consistent with earlier findings that engrafted cells proliferate (Fig. 3D) [14].

thumbnail image

Figure 3. Transplanted allogeneic GFP-NPCs are rejected following intraspinal injection into JHMV-infected mice. (A, B): Representative coronal spinal cord sections obtained at defined locations rostral and caudal to the transplantation site from JHMV-infected mice receiving either syngeneic (A) or allogeneic (B) NPCs. Experimental mice were sacrificed at either 8 or 21 days p.t., and migration/survival of transplanted cells was evaluated by visualization of GFP-expression from transplanted cells. (C): At day 21 p.t., migration/survival of transplanted was cells enumerated. Dual-positive DAPI and GFP-NPCs were counted in coronal sections 9 mm rostral and 6 mm caudal to transplant site at 3 mm intervals from allogeneically transplanted (n = 6) and syngeneically transplanted (n = 7) mice. Arrow indicates transplantation site. Increased numbers (*, p < .05; #, p < .01) of GFP-NPCs were present within the spinal cords of syngeneic recipients compared to allogeneic. (D): GFP expression (determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) is increased (**, p < .001) within the spinal cords of mice following syngeneic versus allogeneic transplant. The fold change of GFP expression was determined at d21 p.t. relative to d1 p.t. in syngeneically transplanted (day 1, n = 3, d21: n = 4) and allogeneically transplanted (day 1, n = 3, d21: n = 3) mice. Abbreviations: GFP, green fluorescent protein; NPCs, neural progenitor cells; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Elevated T-Cell Inflammation into the Spinal Cords of Allogeneic Recipients

Spinal cords from mice receiving either syngeneic or allogeneic NPCs were isolated and lymphocyte infiltration was determined. By day 8 p.t., both CD4+ (p < .05) and CD8+ T-cell infiltration was elevated in comparison to nontransplanted JHMV-infected mice as determined by flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 4A). There was not a significant increase of either CD4 or CD8 T cells following syngeneic transplant (data not shown). We next determined if transcripts associated with T-cell infiltration were elevated in allogeneic transplanted mice compared to nontransplanted mice. At day 1 p.t. transcripts for the T-cell chemoattractant CXCL10 (Fig. 4B) and day 8 p.t. the chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 and the cytokine IFN-γ (Fig. 4C) were significantly increased (p < .05) in the allogeneically transplanted spinal cord relative to sham transplant. There was no significant difference in CXCL9, CXCL10, or IFN-γ following syngeneic transplant (data not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 4. Increased CD4+ T cells in spinal cord of allogeneically transplanted mice. (A): Flow cytometric analysis was performed on mononuclear cells isolated from spinal cord (9 mm rostral and caudal to transplant site was used) of mice 8 days following allogeneic transplantation of NPCs or sham transplantation. Two spinal cords were pooled for each cell isolation. Cells were stained with PE-conjugated CD4 and PE-Cy7-conjugated CD8. The number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was determined in each NPC transplanted and sham transplanted group and normalized to mg of isolated spinal cord. (B, C): CXCL9, CXCL10, and IFN-γ mRNA from spinal cords of mice allogeneically transplanted with GFP-NPC (n = 9) or sham transplanted (n = 7) at day 1 p.t. (B) and day 8 p.t. (C) were analyzed by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Ct values were normalized to GAPDH, and the ratio of each mRNA from allogeneic transplant to sham transplant at day 8 p.t. was determined (ΔΔCt). ΔCt for allogeneic transplant compared to ΔCt for sham transplant was used for calculating statistical significance, *, p < .05. Standard error is presented as ΔΔCt. Abbreviations: IFN, interferon; NPC, neural progenitor cell.

Download figure to PowerPoint

T Cells Are Sensitized to Allogeneic NPCs

We next determined if T cells isolated from transplanted mice were sensitized to allogeneic NPCs by measuring T-cell proliferation in response to NPC coculture through use of an MLR assay. To ensure T-cells proliferation was not caused by potential contamination of APCs during the isolation, T cells were enriched from the spleens of recipient mice and subsequently sorted by FACS to isolate specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell populations (>99% purity, Fig. 5A). Cocultures of T-cell subsets from mice at day 21 p.t. mice showed increased CD4+ T-cell proliferation in response to exposure to MHC-mismatched splenocytes as well as NPCs treated in medium alone or IFN-γ as compared to CD4+ T-cells from naïve nontransplanted BALB/c mice (Fig. 5B). Notably, IFN-γ treatment did not significantly alter T-cell proliferative response. Although CD8+ T cells exhibited a similar response to MHC-mismatched splenocytes as CD4+ T cells, there was a comparatively muted response to NPCs (Fig. 5B). Further, ELISPOT analysis revealed increased (p < .05) numbers of IFN-γ-producing T cells following coculture with either C57BL/6 splenocytes or NPCs used as stimulators compared to T cells obtained from naïve nontransplanted mice (Fig. 5C). We next tested whether there was an antigen-recall response to transplanted allogeneic NPCs in vivo by measuring a DTH response. Naïve nontransplanted BALB/c mice or GFP-NPC-transplanted BALB/c mice received a footpad injection of GFP-NPCs at day 21 p.t. The majority of injected GFP-NPC transplanted mice (75%; six out of eight) exhibited increased footpad swelling relative to naïve nontransplanted controls by 24 hours post-footpad injection, and this increased to approximately 90% of mice responding by 48 hours following injection. At 24 hours, the footpad swelling in mice that received intraspinal NPCs (0.42 ± 0.12 mm) was significantly (p < .01) greater than swelling in naïve nontransplanted control mice (0.18 ± 0.10 mm, Fig. 5D). As controls, naïve BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice received a subcutaneous injection of GFP-NPCs and 8 days later challenged with GFP-NPCs and footpad swelling was measured at days 1, 2, and 4 postinjection. Challenge of BALB/c mice injected with allogeneic GFP-NPCs resulted in a significant (p < .05) increase in footpad swelling at days 2 and 4 postchallenge compared to syngeneic confirming that GFP-NPCs were antigenic within the context of allogeneic injection whereas syngeneic injection elicits no immune response (data not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 5. Allogeneic green fluorescent protein (GFP)-NPCs elicit T-cell response. (A): Representative flow cytometric analysis revealing >99% purity of fluorescence-activated cell-sorted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from spleens of mice transplanted with allogeneic NPCs at day 21 p.t. (B): Purified T cells from (A) were cocultured with GFP-NPCs or splenocytes treated with either medium or IFN-γ (100 U/ml) and proliferation was determined by EF670 dye expression. Statistical significance was determined by comparing the number of dividing T cells from BALB/c mice at day 21 p.t. with the number of dividing T cells from naïve nontransplanted BALB/c mice (*, p < .05; #, p < .01). (C): IFN-γ production from T cells isolated from spleens of mice receiving either allogeneic NPCs or naïve mice was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent spot assay following exposure to GFP-NPCs or C57BL/6 splenocytes. (D): Footpad swelling was determined at 24 and 48 hours post-GFP-NPC footpad injection (d21 p.t.) in naïve BALB/c mice and BALB/c mice that received intraspinal transplant of GFP-NPCs. Abbreviations: FP, footpad; IFN, interferon; NPC, neural progenitor cell.

Download figure to PowerPoint

T-Cell Depletion Increases Survival of Allogeneic NPCs

As an additional test to confirm the importance of T cells in contributing to rejection of MHC-mismatched NPCs, JHMV-infected BALB/c mice were transplanted with GFP-NPCs, treated with depleting monoclonal antibodies specific for either CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes, and allogeneic cell survival was determined at 3 weeks p.t. Treatment with antibodies specific for either T-cell subset resulted in >98% depletion of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells within the periphery (Fig. 6A, top panel). However, within the spinal cord, antibody treatment only resulted in approximately 45% reduction in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell levels (Fig. 6A, bottom panel). This most likely reflects limited penetration of monoclonal antibodies into the CNS and/or muted efficacy in depleting T cells within the CNS. Nonetheless, T-cell depletion resulted in a significant increase in numbers of allogeneic NPCs when compared to allogeneic recipients treated with control antibody (Fig. 6C). Depletion of CD4+ T cells had the greatest effect on allogeneic NPC survival when compared to animals treated with anti-CD8 (Fig. 6C). In recipients of allogeneic NPCs treated with anti-CD4, surviving NPCs accumulated within white matter tracts in which demyelinating lesions were present whereas anti-CD8 treatment restricted migration of cells primarily to the dorsal funiculus (Fig. 6B). These observations implicate T cells as important in contributing to rejection of allogeneic NPCs. Finally, surviving allogeneic GFP-NPCs from transplanted mice treated with either anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 were capable of differentiating into PDGFRα+ oligodendrocytes, similar GFP-NPCs in a syngeneic transplant without treatment. This demonstrates that the differentiation fate of allogeneically transplanted NPCs is not affected by the antibody treatment (Fig. 6D).

thumbnail image

Figure 6. Depleting T cells increases survival of allogeneic GFP-NPCs within the spinal cords of JHMV-infected mice. JHMV-infected mice transplanted with either syngeneic or allogeneic GFP-NPCs were treated with anti-CD4 (GK1.5, n = 5), anti-CD8 (Ly2.2, n = 3), or isogenic IgG control (n = 4) at d −1, 1, 3, 5, 12, and 19 p.t. and mice sacrificed at d21 p.t. Presence of NPCs was determined by immunofluorescence imaging of GFP expression. (A): Representative flow analysis of the spleen (top panel) and spinal cord (bottom panel) reveals the presence of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells following anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 treatment. (B): Representative spinal cord sections from transplanted mice treated with either CD4 or CD8 depleting antibodies showing the presence of GFP-NPCs. (C): Quantification of GFP-NPCs in transplanted mice treated with T-cell depleting antibodies and numbers of GFP-NPCs determined along the length of the spinal cord both rostral and caudal to implantation site. Depletion of either CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell subsets increases survival (*, p < .05; #, p < .01; **, p < .001) in mice transplanted with allogeneic NPCs compared to mice transplanted with syngeneic NPCs. (D): Representative immunofluorescence ×40 images showing PDGFRα+ (red) GFP-NPCs (green), with DAPI stained nuclei (blue), at day 21 p.t. of syngeneically transplanted mice without antibody treatment or allogeneically transplanted mice with anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 treatment. Abbreviations: DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; GFP, green fluorescent protein; NPCs, neural progenitor cells; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor.

Download figure to PowerPoint

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

The use of neural stem/progenitor cells for treatment of human neurologic diseases is recognized as a clinically viable approach for reducing disease severity and promoting recovery. Indeed, human neural stem cells (NSCs) are currently approved for use in clinical trials for improving function in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, a fatal neurodegenerative disorder in children as well as Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease, a fatal myelination disorder (www.stemcellsinc.com). Additionally, use of NPCs has been shown to restore cognition following transplantation into the CNS of mice with neuropathological conditions similar to those observed in patients with Alzheimer's Disease [36] and ameliorates radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction in rats [37, 38]. NPCs are attractive to use for treating a broad array of human neurologic disease conditions based on evidence that NPCs are capable of differentiating into distinct glial lineages and neurons as well as promoting neurogenesis [12, 39–41]. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials and experimental models of neurologic disease indicate there is no evidence of tumor or non-neural tissue formation that further strengthens the relevance of using these cells for disease treatment [41–43]. Therefore, the potential for using NPCs for restoring functional and behavioral deficits arising from loss or damage of host CNS cells holds great promise and clinical interest. A potentially critical aspect in better understanding the biology of NPC transplantation relates to the antigenicity of these cells as well as their ability to modulate the host's immune response. Highlighting the importance of this area of research are conflicting reports indicating that NPCs are immunologically inert and well-tolerated following transplantation into MHC-mismatched animals [15] while other reports demonstrate that both innate and adaptive arms of the immune system are activated and participate in killing allogeneic NPCs [19, 20].

Our previous studies have convincingly demonstrated that intraspinal transplantation of syngeneic NPCs into mice persistently infected with JHMV results in migration from the site of transplant with selective colonization of areas of white matter damage, enhanced differentiation into oligodendroglia accompanied by axonal sparing and remyelination [12, 13, 14]. Based upon this body of work, it is clear that transplanted cells were critical in contributing to the improved histopathological outcome [14, 44]. Therefore, understanding whether allogeneic NPCs survive following transplantation into JHMV-infected mice is important not only with regards to improved clinical and histologic outcome within the context of this model but also with regards to other models in which NPC transplantation has been shown to be beneficial. Our findings clearly demonstrate that MHC mistmatched NPCs are not immunopriviledged but rather antigenic following transplantation into JHMV-infected mice with established neuroinflammatory-mediated demyelination. Evidence is provided that supports an important role for T cells in contributing to rejection as (a) NPCs evoke a DTH response following footpad injection into transplanted mice, (b) coculture of NPCs with T cells isolated from transplanted mice results in T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion, and (c) depletion of T-cell subsets increases survival of allogeneic NPCs.

Our data demonstrating that treatment of cultured NPCs with IFN-γ increases expression of both MHC class I and II is consistent with earlier studies indicating cultured NPCs are capable of expressing these molecules in response to IFN-γ treatment [15, 19, 45]. Similarly, we show that cultured NPCs do not constitutively express either MHC I or II, but detectable levels are present only in response to treatment with IFN-γ. Furthermore, exposure of cultured NPCs with CM obtained following stimulation of virus-specific T-cells not only increased the overall frequency of both MHC class I and II on NPCs but also enhanced expression on a per cell basis. These findings reflect that NPCs are sensitive to inflammatory cytokines that subsequently increase surface expression of MHC antigens. Lack of constitutive MHC expression on NPCs is consistent with other studies reporting that both embryonic stem cells (mouse and human) and induced pluripotent stem cells do not express MHC antigens [46, 47]. Muted expression of MHC antigens on stem/progenitor cells has been suggested as one potential mechanism contributing to prolonged survival following transplantation into an MHC incompatible host as it would limit recognition by inflammatory T cells. We also report that costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 are constitutively expressed on NPCs, and expression is not modulated following exposure to IFN-γ in vitro. This is in contrast to previous reports that show that although mouse NPCs express CD80 and CD86, these costimulatory molecules are upregulated following IFN-γ treatment or under pathological conditions [48, 49]. Collectively, these findings highlight that the environmental inflammatory cytokine milieu may be critical with regards to influencing expression of surface antigens on allogeneic NPCs that allow for detection by activated immune cells.

Our findings are in contrast with earlier studies [15, 20] indicating that NPCs possess inherent immune privilege and are capable of prolonged survival in an unsensitized host. Indeed, our findings are more consistent with Chen et al. [19] indicating that allogeneic NPCs exhibit limited survival in response to transplantation into the CNS although innate, rather than adaptive, immune responses were responsible for NPC killing in their model system. However, caution must be exercised when considering these studies collectively. Both Hori et al. [15] and Chen et al. [19] used normal recipient mice in which no inflammatory disease conditions were present prior to transplantation.

The presence of inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, within diseased tissue may be a relevant factor in contributing to allogeneic NPC survival. Exposure of allogeneic NPCs to proinflammatory cytokines upon transplant could presumably increase MHC antigen expression leading to recognition by infiltrating T cells. Consistent with this possibility is our data demonstrating that allogeneic NPCs are quickly rejected following transplantation into spinal cords of JHMV-demyelinated spinal cord, an environment where activated T-cells secreting IFN-γ are readily present. Moreover, we demonstrate that NPCs are sensitive to exposure to conditioned media obtained from JHMV-specific T cells stimulated with defined viral antigens, and this increases expression of MHC class I and II antigens.

Based on our results, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells contribute to rejection as depletion of either subset increased survival of engrafted cells. However, greater numbers of inflammatory CD4+ T cells were present within the spinal cords of allogeneic NPC recipients when compared to infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, treatment with anti-CD4+ T-cell subset depleting antibodies resulted in enhanced survival of allogeneic NPCs when compared to animals treated with anti-CD8+ T-cell subset antibodies. These data support a recent report demonstrating a more important role for CD4+ T cells in immune-mediated rejection of hESC xenografts [47]. Nevertheless, T cells are clearly sensitized to allogeneic NPCs following injection into MHC mismatched JHMV-infected mice as demonstrated by increased proliferation, detectable DTH responses, and IFN-γ secretion by T cells. It is important to emphasize that administration of T-cell-specific depleting antibodies did not completely eliminate T cells within the CNS although these cells were efficiently depleted from the periphery.

Mechanisms by which T cells participate in killing NPCs include direct recognition of surface-bound antigen(s) that are either constitutively expressed or induced upon transplantation. Therefore, increased expression of MHC antigens on transplanted allogeneic NPCs would represent a potential target for activated T cells present within the spinal cords of persistently infected mice. In addition, indirect recognition (e.g., phagocytic engulfment of dead/dying NPCs) and subsequent presentation of antigens represents an additional scenario by which T cells become sensitized to alloantigens. This is not an unreasonable scenario as many NPCs will die during injection into the spinal cord, and these cells are presumably removed by activated inflammatory macrophages that could then migrate to secondary lymphatic tissue and present novel antigens to naïve lymphocytes. Alternatively, alloantigens could be shed following transplantation and presented by local APCs following phagocytic uptake. At this time, we have not distinguished whether direct and/or indirect recognition of NPC antigens is occurring in response to NPC transplantation into JHMV-infected mice. However, indirect recognition may favor a more important role for CD4+ T cells in contributing to rejection and this is consistent with our findings. Interestingly, we also demonstrate NPCs that survive following depletion of T-cell subsets exhibit normal differentiation into OPCs similar to syngeneic NPC recipients. These findings argue that the local microenvironmental niche remains capable of providing necessary growth factors required for fate commitment to the oligodendroglia lineage.

Although T cells are clearly important in killing allogeneic NPC transplants, it does not rule out the possibility that cellular components of the innate immune response are also contributing to rejection. For example, NK cells have been shown to be involved in numerous models of allograft rejection including bone marrow, skin, and cornea allografts [50–52]. The observed result that not every allogeneic NPC transplanted mouse yielded DTH swelling or IFN-γ production in response to allogeneic NPC or splenocyte stimulators could be due to NK cell-mediated rejection, thus limiting memory T-cell formation. As recently illustrated by Palmer and colleagues [19], transplantation of allogeneic NPCs into the hippocampus of normal mice resulted in a dramatic reduction in survival, and this was the result of innate immune responses directed to transplanted cells. Induction of immune suppression through treatment with cyclosporine A did not increase allogeneic NPC survival yet treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs protected NPCs from destruction [19]. These findings clearly illustrate the importance of innate immune responses in participating in allograft destruction and further highlight the importance of the local microenvironment in allogeneic NPC transplantation as the lingering effects of inflammation at the transplant site are likely to result in killing of allografts through both innate and adaptive immune responses.

CONCLUSION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

In conclusion, our findings provide evidence that allogeneic NPCs are not immune privileged upon transplantation into an established inflammatory environment. Rejection is rapid and involves T-cell responses directed against NPC alloantigens, although CD4+ T cells are a more important mediator of immune-mediated rejection. In consideration of using NPCs for treating chronic neuroinflammatory diseases such as MS, the use of immunomodulatory drugs should be considered in order to increase survival of allografts in order to improve clinical outcome.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

This work was funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant R01 NS074987 and a National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS) Collaborative Center Research Award (CA1058-A-8) to T.E.L. C.M.W. is supported by NIH R01AI63419, NMSS RG4288, and JDRF 5-2010-306. J.G.W. is supported by a NMSS postdoctoral fellowship (FG 1960-A-1), and S.M.K. is supported by training Grant T32 GM08620.

DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES

The authors indicate there are no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSION
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
  10. REFERENCES