Space Weather

Cover image for Space Weather

October 2013

Volume 11, Issue 10

Pages 543–635

  1. Meeting Reports

    1. Top of page
    2. Meeting Reports
    3. Technical Papers
    1. The Future of Spacecraft Radiation Design: A Workshop at Aberystwyth University, UK, 28–30 November 2012 (pages 543–544)

      M. Grande and T. M. Knight

      Article first published online: 17 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/swe.20102

      Key Points

      • Future of Spacecraft Radiation design
    2. Seventh Annual NOAA-Industry Space Weather Summit Meets (pages 545–546)

      Devrie S. Intriligator

      Article first published online: 24 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/swe.20101

      Key Points

      • 7th Annual Meeting of NOAA-Industry Space Weather Summit
  2. Technical Papers

    1. Top of page
    2. Meeting Reports
    3. Technical Papers
    1. Dose spectra from energetic particles and neutrons (pages 547–556)

      Nathan Schwadron, Chris Bancroft, Peter Bloser, Jason Legere, James Ryan, Sonya Smith, Harlan Spence, Joe Mazur and Cary Zeitlin

      Article first published online: 2 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/swe.20095

      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image

      Key Points

      • Early-stage space technology research project
      • Laboratory measurements from DoSEN prototype
      • Low-mass instrument that detects full spectrum of radiation
    2. Forecasting propagation and evolution of CMEs in an operational setting: What has been learned (pages 557–574)

      Yihua Zheng, Peter Macneice, Dusan Odstrcil, M. L. Mays, Lutz Rastaetter, Antti Pulkkinen, Aleksandre Taktakishvili, Michael Hesse, M. Masha Kuznetsova, Hyesook Lee and Anna Chulaki

      Article first published online: 2 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/swe.20096

      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image

      Key Points

      • CME simulation useful for SEP monitoring
    3. Geomagnetically induced currents in Europe: Characteristics based on a local power grid model (pages 575–584)

      A. Viljanen, R. Pirjola, E. Prácser, S. Ahmadzai and V. Singh

      Article first published online: 3 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/swe.20098

      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image

      Key Points

      • European-wide estimation of GIC
      • Largest GIC in North Europe due to high magnetic activity
      • Small ground conductivity further increases GIC in North Europe
    4. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
      A major solar eruptive event in July 2012: Defining extreme space weather scenarios (pages 585–591)

      D. N. Baker, X. Li, A. Pulkkinen, C. M. Ngwira, M. L. Mays, A. B. Galvin and K. D. C. Simunac

      Article first published online: 9 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/swe.20097

      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image

      Key Points

      • The July 2012 solar eruption was a spectacular event
      • This would have had severe space weather impacts at Earth
    5. Neural networks to predict exosphere temperature corrections (pages 592–602)

      Anna Choury, Sean Bruinsma and Philippe Schaeffer

      Article first published online: 22 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/2013SW000969

      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image

      Key Points

      • Exosphere temperatures inferred from neutral density data
      • Accurate exosphere temperature forecasts with neural network (1.8%)
      • DTM thermosphere model using the forecasts improves orbit precision hugely
    6. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
      NAIRAS aircraft radiation model development, dose climatology, and initial validation (pages 603–635)

      Christopher J. Mertens, Matthias M. Meier, Steven Brown, Ryan B. Norman and Xiaojing Xu

      Article first published online: 25 OCT 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/swe.20100

      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image
      • image

      Key Points

      • Dose predictions are within 50% of measured data
      • Model is within ICRU acceptable uncertainty limit
      • Largest model uncertainty is at low latitudes

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION