SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    John Conrad Merkel, Abdelkrim Brania, Assessment of Peer-Led Team Learning in Calculus I: A Five-year Study, Innovative Higher Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Julia Y. K. Chan, Christopher F. Bauer, Effect of peer-led team learning (PLTL) on student achievement, attitude, and self-concept in college general chemistry in randomized and quasi experimental designs, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 3
  3. 3
    Ara C. Austin, Hagit Ben-Daat, Mary Zhu, Robert Atkinson, Nathan Barrows, Ian R. Gould, Measuring student performance in general organic chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2015, 16, 1, 168

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Tamara N. Hrin, Dušica D. Milenković, Mirjana D. Segedinac, The Effect of Systemic Synthesis Questions [SSynQs] on Students’ Performance and Meaningful Learning in Secondary Organic Chemistry Teaching, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    G. Cavalli, I. Hamerton, S. Lygo-Baker, What are we going to do about a problem like polymer chemistry? Develop new methods of delivery to improve understanding of a demanding interdisciplinary topic, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2015, 16, 2, 293

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    David L. Lafarge, Ludovic M. Morge, Martine M. Méheut, A New Higher Education Curriculum in Organic Chemistry: What Questions Should Be Asked?, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 2, 173

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Marina Kogan, Sandra L. Laursen, Assessing Long-Term Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning: A Case Study from College Mathematics, Innovative Higher Education, 2014, 39, 3, 183

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    David Fortus, Attending to affect, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 7
  9. 9
    Pamela Brown, Implementation of a Program for Mentoring Students in a Two-Year Chemical Technology Program by an Alumnus Enrolled in Graduate School, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 4, 605

    CrossRef

  10. You have free access to this content10
    Jeffrey E. Froyd, Maura Borrego, Leadership Insights from the National Science Foundation Engineering Education Coalitions Program and Other Large Curriculum Initiatives, Journal of Leadership Studies, 2014, 8, 1
  11. 11
    Christopher C. Knutson, Milton N. Jackson, Matt Beekman, Matthew E. Carnes, Darren W. Johnson, David C. Johnson, Douglas A. Keszler, Mentoring Graduate Students in Research and Teaching by Utilizing Research as a Template, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 2, 200

    CrossRef

  12. You have free access to this content12
    Joshua Smith, Sarah Beth Wilson, Julianna Banks, Lin Zhu, Pratibha Varma-Nelson, Replicating Peer-Led Team Learning in cyberspace: Research, opportunities, and challenges, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 6
  13. 13
    Denise Drane, Marina Micari, Gregory Light, Students as teachers: effectiveness of a peer-led STEM learning programme over 10 years, Educational Research and Evaluation, 2014, 20, 3, 210

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Donna M. Hall, Amanda J. Curtin-Soydan, Dorian A. Canelas, The Science Advancement through Group Engagement Program: Leveling the Playing Field and Increasing Retention in Science, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Daniel T. Pyburn, Samuel Pazicni, Victor A. Benassi, Elizabeth M. Tappin, The Testing Effect: An Intervention on Behalf of Low-Skilled Comprehenders in General Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 12, 2045

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    K. D. Kloepper, Addressing the Millennial Student in Undergraduate Chemistry, 2014,

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Renée S. Cole, Nicole Becker, Courtney Stanford, Tools of Chemistry Education Research, 2014,

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Scott E. Lewis, Addressing the Millennial Student in Undergraduate Chemistry, 2014,

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Sonia M. Gómez Puente, Michiel van Eijck, Wim Jochems, A sampled literature review of design-based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2013, 23, 3, 717

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Ushiri Kulatunga, Richard S. Moog, Jennifer E. Lewis, Argumentation and participation patterns in general chemistry peer-led sessions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 10
  21. 21
    Krista K. Young, Vicente Talanquer, Effect of Different Types of Small-Group Activities on Students’ Conversations, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 9, 1123

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Dimitrios G. Giarikos, Sagir Patel, Andrew Lister, Reza Razeghifard, Incorporation of Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry into the Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 1, 106

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Michael J Evans, Jeffrey S Moore, Peer tutoring with the aid of the Internet, British Journal of Educational Technology, 2013, 44, 1
  24. 24
    Enrique J. Lopez, Kiruthiga Nandagopal, Richard J. Shavelson, Evan Szu, John Penn, Self-regulated learning study strategies and academic performance in undergraduate organic chemistry: An investigation examining ethnically diverse students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  25. 25
    Katie E. Amaral, John D. Shank, Ivan A. Shibley, Lisa R. Shibley, Web-Enhanced General Chemistry Increases Student Completion Rates, Success, and Satisfaction, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 3, 296

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Pratibha Varma-Nelson, Julianna Banks, Trajectories of Chemistry Education Innovation and Reform, 2013,

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Rebecca L. Matz, Edward D. Rothman, Joseph S. Krajcik, Mark M. Banaszak Holl, Concurrent enrollment in lecture and laboratory enhances student performance and retention, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 5
  28. 28
    Marina Micari, Pilar Pazos, Connecting to the Professor: Impact of the Student–Faculty Relationship in a Highly Challenging Course, College Teaching, 2012, 60, 2, 41

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley, Michael W. Klymkowsky, Development and Assessment of a Molecular Structure and Properties Learning Progression, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 11, 1351

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Yancey D. Mitchell, Jessica Ippolito, Scott E. Lewis, Evaluating Peer-Led Team Learning across the two semester General Chemistry sequence, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012, 13, 3, 378

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Kenneth A. Rath, Alan Peterfreund, Frank Bayliss, Elizabeth Runquist, Ursula Simonis, Impact of Supplemental Instruction in Entry-Level Chemistry Courses at a Midsized Public University, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 4, 449

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Pamela White, Amy Beth Rowland, Irena Pesis-Katz, Peer–Led Team Learning Model in a Graduate–Level Nursing Course, Journal of Nursing Education, 2012, 51, 8, 471

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Tracy X.P. Zou, Edmond I. Ko, Teamwork development across the curriculum for chemical engineering students in Hong Kong: Processes, outcomes and lessons learned, Education for Chemical Engineers, 2012, 7, 3, e105

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Anne V. Vázquez, Kaitlin McLoughlin, Melanie Sabbagh, Adam C. Runkle, Jeffrey Simon, Brian P. Coppola, Samuel Pazicni, Writing-To-Teach: A New Pedagogical Approach To Elicit Explanative Writing from Undergraduate Chemistry Students, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 8, 1025

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Shenghua Zha, Christy Lee Ottendorfer, Effects of Peer-Led Online Asynchronous Discussion on Undergraduate Students' Cognitive Achievement, American Journal of Distance Education, 2011, 25, 4, 238

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Donita Massengill Shaw, Promoting Professional Student Learning Through Study Groups: A Case Study, College Teaching, 2011, 59, 2, 85

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Franz-Josef Scharfenberg, Franz X. Bogner, Instructional Efficiency of Changing Cognitive Load in an Out-of-School Laboratory, International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32, 6, 829

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Marina Micari, Pilar Pazos, Bernhard Streitwieser, Gregory Light, Small-group learning in undergraduate STEM disciplines: effect of group type on student achievement, Educational Research and Evaluation, 2010, 16, 3, 269

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Sabine E. Severiens, Henk G. Schmidt, Academic and social integration and study progress in problem based learning, Higher Education, 2009, 58, 1, 59

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Henk G Schmidt, Janke Cohen-Schotanus, Lidia R Arends, Impact of problem-based, active learning on graduation rates for 10 generations of Dutch medical students, Medical Education, 2009, 43, 3
  41. 41
    Marina Micari, Gregory Light, Reliance to Independence: Approaches to learning in peer-led undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics workshops, International Journal of Science Education, 2009, 31, 13, 1713

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Scott P. Schaffer, Kimfong Lei, Lisette Reyes Paulino, A framework for cross-disciplinary team learning and performance, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2008, 21, 3
  43. 43
    Thomas Eberlein, Jack Kampmeier, Vicky Minderhout, Richard S. Moog, Terry Platt, Pratibha Varma-Nelson, Harold B. White, Pedagogies of engagement in science, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2008, 36, 4
  44. 44
    Scott E. Lewis, Jennifer E. Lewis, Seeking effectiveness and equity in a large college chemistry course: an HLM investigation of Peer-Led Guided Inquiry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008, 45, 7
  45. 45
    E. Michael Nussbaum, Denise L. Winsor, Yvette M. Aqui, Anne M. Poliquin, Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2007, 2, 4, 479

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Arthur L. Odom, Elizabeth R. Stoddard, Steven M. LaNasa, Teacher Practices and Middle-school Science Achievements, International Journal of Science Education, 2007, 29, 11, 1329

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Dimitrios Stamovlasis, Andreas Dimos, Georgios Tsaparlis, A study of group interaction processes in learning lower secondary physics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2006, 43, 6
  48. 48
    Kevin C. de Berg, THE STATUS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM IN CHEMICAL EDUCATION RESEARCH AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE TEACHING AND LEARNING OF THE CONCEPT OF IDEALIZATION IN CHEMISTRY, Foundations of Chemistry, 2006, 8, 2, 153

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Weili Wang, Richard K. Coll, An Investigation of Tertiary-level Learning in Some Practical Physics Courses, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2005, 3, 4, 639

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Gail R. Luera, Charlotte A. Otto, Development and Evaluation of an Inquiry-Based Elementary Science Teacher Education Program Reflecting Current Reform Movements, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2005, 16, 3, 241

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Denise Drane, H. David Smith, Greg Light, Larry Pinto, Su Swarat, The Gateway Science Workshop Program: Enhancing Student Performance and Retention in the Sciences Through Peer-Facilitated Discussion, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2005, 14, 3, 337

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent, The Intellectual Development of Science and Engineering Students. Part 2: Teaching to Promote Growth, Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, 93, 4
  53. 53
    Terry Platt, Eugene Barber, Antoine Yoshinaka, Vicki Roth, An innovative selection and training program for problem-based learning (PBL) workshop leaders in biochemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2003, 31, 2
  54. 54
    Brian P. Coppola, Do Real Work, Not Homework,
  55. 55
    Todd B. Kashdan, Frank D. Fincham, Facilitating Curiosity: A Social and Self-Regulatory Perspective for Scientifically Based Interventions,