Comments & Criticism
Comment: Methodological concerns about AAAS's Project 2061 study of science textbooks
Article first published online: 17 APR 2003
Copyright © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Volume 40, Issue 5, pages 529–534, May 2003
How to Cite
Holliday, W. G. (2003), Comment: Methodological concerns about AAAS's Project 2061 study of science textbooks. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40: 529–534. doi: 10.1002/tea.10094
- Issue published online: 17 APR 2003
- Article first published online: 17 APR 2003
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 JAN 2003
- Manuscript Received: 27 SEP 2002
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- AAAS. (1999, Fall). Heavy texts: Light on learning. 2061 Today, 9, 1, 3.
- AAAS. (2001, Spring/Summer). Collaborating to create better texts: Project 2061 host conference on science textbooks. 2061 Today, 11, 3, 5.
- 1991). Teaching and learning history. In J.P.Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning: A project of the National Council for the Social Studies (pp. 400–410). New York: Macmillan. & (
- Editorial. (1989, February 28). Still no beef. The Washington Post, A22.
- 1989, February 24). Science-study reform sought; Aim is to broaden all students' skills. The Washington Post, A1, A6. (
- 2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522–549. & (
- 1999). Evaluating mathematics textbooks. Basic Education, 43, 6–8. (
- National Research Council. (1990). Fulfilling the promise: Biology education in the nation's schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1999, December). Project 2061 rates middle level science texts. NSTA Reports, 11, 1, 6–7, 15.
- 2001). Biology teachers deserve better textbooks. American Biology Teacher, 63, 146–147. (
- Heavy books: Light on learning: AAAS Project 2061 evaluates middles grades science textbooks. AAAS website. (http://www.project2061.org/newsinfo/research/textbook/articles/heavy.htm) , , , & (n.d.).
- 2002) Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at Benchmarks and Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 889–910. & (
- 2001, October). Textbook alignment. The Science Teacher, 68, 52–56. & (
- 2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research. (