SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). Middle grades mathematics textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Project 2061 AAAS science textbook conference [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Project 2061.
  • Brearton, M.A. & Shuttleworth, S. (1999). Racing a comet. Journal of Staff Development, 20(1), 3033.
  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
  • Editorial. (1989, February 28). Still no beef. The Washington Post, A22.
  • Feynman, R. (1977). The Feynman Lectures on Physics (vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Hammrich, P. (1997, March). Teaching for excellence: Using Project 2061 Benchmarks for more effective science instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL.
  • Holliday, W. (2003). Methodological concerns about AAAS's Project 2061 study of science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 529534.
  • Kesidou, S. (2001). Aligning curriculum materials with national science standards: The role of Project 2061's curriculum-materials analysis procedure in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 4765.
  • Kesidou, S. & Roseman, J.E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522549.
  • Lynch, S. (1999, March). Using Project 2061's curriculum analysis to evaluate educational software: Novice teachers' responses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Sciences Resources Center. (1998). Resources for teaching middle school science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Roseman, J.E. (1997). Lessons learned from Project 2061: Practical ways to implement benchmarks and standards. The Science Teacher, 64, 2629.
  • Roseman, J.E., Kesidou, S., & Stern, L. (1997). Identifying curriculum materials for science literacy: A Project 2061 evaluation tool. Based on a paper prepared for the colloquium held at the National Research Council, November 10–12, 1996, Washington, DC. (Retrieved January 17, 2003, from http://www.project2061.org/newsinfo/research/roseman/roseman1.htm)
  • Stern, L. & Ahlgren, A. (2002). Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 889910.
  • Weinburgh, M. (2000, January). K–12 benchmarks and standards: What role should they play in pre-service programs? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Akron, OH.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Guidebook to examine school curricula. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Weiss, I.R. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.