Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making
Article first published online: 30 APR 2001
DOI: 10.1002/tea.1017
Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S. and Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001), Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 38: 529–552. doi: 10.1002/tea.1017
Publication History
- Issue published online: 30 APR 2001
- Article first published online: 30 APR 2001
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 DEC 2000
- Manuscript Received: 1 MAR 2000
Funded by
- NSF. Grant Numbers: RED 9153961, RED 9453086, ESI 9555712
- Spencer Foundation
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Grant Numbers: Cooperative Agreement nos. R306A60001-96, R305A60007-98
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
There are many ways to understand the gap in science learning and achievement separating low-income, ethnic minority and linguistic minority children from more economically privileged students. In this article we offer our perspective. First, we discuss in broad strokes how the relationship between everyday and scientific knowledge and ways of knowing has been conceptualized in the field of science education research. We consider two dominant perspectives on this question, one which views the relationship as fundamentally discontinuous and the other which views it as fundamentally continuous. We locate our own work within the latter tradition and propose a framework for understanding the everyday sense-making practices of students from diverse communities as an intellectual resource in science learning and teaching. Two case studies follow in which we elaborate this point of view through analysis of Haitian American and Latino students' talk and activity as they work to understand metamorphosis and experimentation, respectively. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this new conceptualization for research on science learning and teaching. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 38: 529–552, 2001

1098-2736/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=2693ae4b4a7f0fba478ed5b44473ab6a3e39f95c)
1098-2736/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=896a2ba4ee94f7c40454fa06142e5c25371439c0)
1098-2736/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fcb0bc6d9abff1a407c9828e2623a8ca38e12186)