SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Suna Ryu, Korean Middle School Students' Epistemic Ideas of Claim, Data, Evidence, and Argument When Evaluating and Critiquing Arguments, Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 2015, 35, 2, 199

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    R. Peleg, A. Baram-Tsabari, Understanding Producers’ Intentions and Viewers’ Learning Outcomes in a Science Museum Theater Play on Evolution, Research in Science Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    ISABEL BRAUN, MATTHIAS NÜCKLES, Scholarly Holds Lead Over Popular and Instructional: Text Type Influences Epistemological Reading Outcomes, Science Education, 2014, 98, 5
  4. 4
    Wilmo Erneso Francisco Junior, Sara Passos de Lima, Considerações acerca da leitura em livros didáticos de química: uma análise a partir de textos complementares, Educación Química, 2013, 24, 489

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Matthew Kloser, Exploring high school biology students' engagement with more and less epistemologically considerate texts, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 10
  6. 6
    Rogerio Gonçalves Nigro, Silvia Frateschi Trivelato, Knowledge, its Application, and Attitudes Associated with the Reading of Diverse Genres of Science Texts, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 16, 2529

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Stephen P. Norris, Nathan Stelnicki, Gerda de Vries, Teaching Mathematical Biology in High School Using Adapted Primary Literature, Research in Science Education, 2012, 42, 4, 633

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Hedda Falk, Anat Yarden, Stepping into the unknown: three models for the teaching and learning of the opening sections of scientific articles, Journal of Biological Education, 2011, 45, 2, 77

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Linda M. Phillips, Stephen P. Norris, Bridging the Gap Between the Language of Science and the Language of School Science Through the Use of Adapted Primary Literature, Research in Science Education, 2009, 39, 3, 313

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, Marta Federico-Agraso, Justification and Persuasion about Cloning: Arguments in Hwang’s Paper and Journalistic Reported Versions, Research in Science Education, 2009, 39, 3, 331

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Danielle J. Ford, Promises and Challenges for the Use of Adapted Primary Literature in Science Curricula: Commentary, Research in Science Education, 2009, 39, 3, 385

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Stephen P. Norris, Hedda Falk, Marta Federico-Agraso, María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, Linda M. Phillips, Anat Yarden, Reading Science Texts—Epistemology, Inquiry, Authenticity—A Rejoinder to Jonathan Osborne, Research in Science Education, 2009, 39, 3, 405

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Anat Yarden, Reading Scientific Texts: Adapting Primary Literature for Promoting Scientific Literacy, Research in Science Education, 2009, 39, 3, 307

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Ajay Sharma, Charles W. Anderson, Recontextualization of Science from Lab to School: Implications for Science Literacy, Science & Education, 2009, 18, 9, 1253

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Jonathan Osborne, The Potential of Adapted Primary Literature (APL) for Learning: A Response, Research in Science Education, 2009, 39, 3, 397

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Stephen P. Norris, John S. Macnab, Marjorie Wonham, Gerda de Vries, West Nile Virus: Using Adapted Primary Literature in Mathematical Biology to Teach Scientific and Mathematical Reasoning in High School, Research in Science Education, 2009, 39, 3, 321

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    LeeAnn M. Sutherland, Reading in Science: Developing High-Quality Student Text and Supporting Effective Teacher Enactment, The Elementary School Journal, 2008, 109, 2, 162

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Hedda Falk, Gilat Brill, Anat Yarden, Teaching a Biotechnology Curriculum Based on Adapted Primary Literature, International Journal of Science Education, 2008, 30, 14, 1841

    CrossRef