SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, J.A. (1957). Some considerations in the design and use of dynamic flight simulators (AFPTRC-TN D 301.36/6:57-51). San Antonio, TX: Air Force Personnel and Training Research Center.
  • Alessi, S.M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15, 4047.
  • Bayraktar, S. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 173188.
  • Blumberg, A.F. & Mellor, G.L. (1987). A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model. In N.Heaps (Ed.), Three-dimensional coastal ocean models. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
  • Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 3242.
  • Bruer, J.T. (1993). The mind's journey from novice to expert. American Educator, 17, 646.
  • Caird, J.K. (1996). Persistent issues in the application of virtual environment systems to training. Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems. HICS '96, pp. 124132. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
  • De Jong, T. & Van Joolingen, W. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179201.
  • Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, R.B., & Ash, K. (2000). The design of immersive virtual learning environments: Fostering deep understandings of complex scientific knowledge. In M.J.Jacobson & R.B.Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dewey, J. (1990). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Edelson, D.C. (1998). Realizing authentic science learning through the adaptation of scientific practice. In K.Tobin & B.J.Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (vol. 1). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Edelson, D.C., Gordin, D.N., & Pea, R.D. (1997, March). Creating science learning tools from experts' investigation tools: A design framework. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL.
  • Gordin, D.N. & Pea, R.D. (1995). Prospects for scientific visualization as an educational technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 249279.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R.Sternberg & L.Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Larkin, J.H. & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 6599.
  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Linn, M.C. & Muilenburg, L. (1996). Creating lifelong science learners: What models form a firm foundation? Educational Researcher, 25, 1824.
  • Linn, M.C., Songer, N.B., & Eylon, B.-S. (1994). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. The Handbook of Education, 2, 438490.
  • Mayer, R.E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59, 1419.
  • Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Rander, J., & Behrens, W.W. III. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.
  • Merrill, M.D. (1992). Constructivism and instructional design. In T.Duffy & D.Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211227.
  • Price, S. (2002). Animated diagrams: How effective are explicit dynamics for learners? Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Societies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Raghavan, K. & Katz, A. (1989). Smithtown: An intelligent tutoring system. Technological Horizons in Education, 17, 5053.
  • Raghavan, K., Sartoris, M.L., & Glaser, R. (1998). Why does it go up? The impact of the MARS curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 547567.
  • Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rowley, K. & Meyer, N. (2003–2004). The effect of a computer tutor for writers on student writing achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 169187.
  • Ruben, B.D. (1999). Simulations, games and experience-based leaning: The quest for a new paradigm for teaching and learning. Simulation and Gaming, 30, 498505.
  • Scaife, M. & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 45, 185213.
  • Soderberg, P. & Price, F. (2003). An examination of problem-based teaching and learning in population genetics and evolution using EVOLVE, a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 3555.
  • Steffe, L.P. & Olive, J. (2002). Design and use of computer tools for interactive mathematical activity (TIMA). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27, 5576.
  • Stott, P.A., Tett, S.F.B., Jones, G.S., Allen, M.R., Mitchell, J.F.B., & Jenkins, G.J. (2000). External control of 20th century temperature by natural and anthropogenic forcings. Science, 290, 21332137.
  • Stratford, S.J. (1997). A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 323.
  • Tanimoto, S., Winn, W.D., & Akers, D. (2002). A system that supports using student-drawn diagrams to assess comprehension of mathematical formulas. Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Theory and Application of Diagrams (Diagrams '02). New York: Springer.
  • Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M.Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Tversky, B., Morrison, J.B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal for Human–Computer Studies, 57, 247262.
  • Warner, M.J., Kawase, M., & Newton, J.A. (2002). Recent studies of the overturning circulation in Hood Canal. Paper presented at the Puget Sound Research Conference, Olympia, WA.
  • Whitford, D.J. & Eisman, G.A. (1997). Making science come alive. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27, 109113.
  • Windschitl, M. (2000). Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 8195.
  • Windschitl, M. & André, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 145160.
  • Windschitl, M. & Winn, W.D. (2000). A virtual environment designed to help students learn science. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 2000. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Winn, W.D. (1994). Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In W.Schnotz & R.Kulhavy (Eds.), Comprehension of graphics (pp. 327). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Winn, W.D., Windschitl, M., Fruland, R.M., & Lee, Y.-L. (2002). When does immersion in a virtual environment help students construct understanding? Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Societies, 2002. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Witmer, B.G. & Singer, M.J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: “A presence questionnaire,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 225240.
  • Zacharia, Z. & Anderson, O.R. (2003). The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students' conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics, 71, 618629.
  • Zeltzer, D. (1991). Autonomy, interaction and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 127132.