SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amaral, O.M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26, 213239.
  • Au, K.H. & Kawakimi, A.J. (1994). Cultural congruence in instruction. In E.R.Hollins, J.E.King, & W.C.Hayman (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 524). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • August, D. & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Brickhouse, N. & Potter, J. (2001). Young women's scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965980.
  • Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141178.
  • Brown, A.L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23, 412.
  • Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L.Schauble & R.Glaser (Eds.), Innovation in learning new environments for education (pp. 289325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Buxton, C. (2005). Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and math magnet high school. Science Education, 89, 392417.
  • Calabrese Barton, A. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Carey, S. (1985). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers than adults? In S.F.Chipman, J.W.Segal & R.Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (vol. 2, pp. 485517). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Carey, S. & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28, 235251.
  • Casteel, C.P. & Isom, B.A. (1994). Reciprocal processes in science and literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 47, 538545.
  • Chen, Z. & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 10981120.
  • Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 337357.
  • Fradd, S.H. & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers' roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28, 420, 42.
  • Hammond, L. (2001). Notes from California: An anthropological approach to urban science education for language minority families. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 983999.
  • Hart, J. & Lee, O. (2003). Teacher professional development to improve science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 475501.
  • Hewson, P.W., Kahle, J.B., Scantlebury, K., & Davies, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 11301144.
  • Hogan, K., Natasi, B.N., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379432.
  • Jegede, O.J. & Okebukola, P.A. (1991). The relationship between African traditional cosmology and students' acquisition of a science process skill. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 3747.
  • Kahle, J.B., Meece, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African-American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 10191041.
  • Klahr, D. & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 148.
  • Knapp, M.S. & Plecki, M.L. (2001). Investing in the renewal of urban science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 10891100.
  • Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674689.
  • Kuhn, D. (1997). Constraints or guideposts? Developmental psychology and science education. Review of Educational Research, 67, 141150.
  • Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 245 (vol. 60, no. 4). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285327.
  • Lee, O. (2002). Science inquiry for elementary students from diverse backgrounds. In W.G.Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education (vol. 26, pp. 2369). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Lee, O. (2003). Equity for culturally and linguistically diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teachers College Record, 105, 465489.
    Direct Link:
  • Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 6593.
  • Lee, O., Deaktor, R.A., Hart, J.E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention's impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 857887.
  • Lee, O. & Fradd, S.H. (1996). Literacy skills in science performance among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80, 651671.
  • Lee, O. & Fradd, S.H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27, 1221.
  • Lee, O., Hart, J., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 10211043.
  • Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Schauble, L., & Putz, A. (2000). Designing classrooms that support inquiry. In J.Minstrell & E.van Zee (Eds.), Teaching science in the inquiry-based classroom (pp. 8099). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (1998). Reasoning about structure and function: Children's conceptions of gears. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 325.
  • Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science. In R.Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (vol. 5, pp. 101159(. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 635679.
  • Luykx, A., Cuevas, P., Lambert, J., & Lee, O. (2005). Unpacking teachers' “resistance” to integrating students' language and culture into elementary science instruction. In A.Rodríguez & R.S.Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 119141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Luykx, A. & Lee, O. (in press). Measuring instructional congruence in elementary science classrooms: Pedagogical and methodological components of a theoretical framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
  • Luykx, A., Lee, O., & Edwards, U. (in press). Lost in translation: Negotiating meaning in a beginning ESOL science classroom. Educational Policy.
  • McKinley, E., Waiti, P.M., & Bell, B. (1992). Language, culture and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 579595.
  • Merino, B. & Hammond, L. (2001). How do teachers facilitate writing for bilingual learners in “sheltered constructivist” science? Electronic Journal in Science and Literacy, 1.
  • Metz, K.E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93127.
  • Metz, K.E. (1997). On the complex relation between cognitive developmental research and children's science curricula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 151163.
  • Metz, K.E. (2000). Young children's inquiry in biology: Building the knowledge bases to empower independent inquiry. In J.Minstrell & E.H.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 371404). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nelson-Barber, S. & Estrin, E.T. (1995). Bringing Native American perspectives to mathematics and science teaching. Theory into Practice, 34, 174185.
  • Osborne, A.B. (1996). Practice into theory into practice: Culturally relevant pedagogy for students we have marginalized and normalized. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 27, 285314.
  • Rosebery, A.S., Warren, B., & Conant, F.R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 6194.
  • Roth, W.-M. & McGinn, M. (1998). undelete science education:/lives/work/voices. Journal of Research in Science Education, 35, 399421.
  • Secada, W.G. & Lee, O. (2003). A study of highly effective USI schools in the teaching of mathematics and science: Classroom level results. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
  • Settlage, J. & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 114127.
  • Smith, C., Carey, S., & Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21, 177233.
  • Solano-Flores, G. & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553573.
  • Spillane, J.P., Diamond, J.B., Walker, L.J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918940.
  • Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664687.
  • Valeras, M., Luster, B., & Wenzel, S. (1999). Meaning making in a community of learners: Struggles and possibilities in an urban science class. Research in Science Education, 29, 227245.
  • Valeras, M. & Pineda, E. (1999). Intermingling and bumpiness: Exploring meaning making in the discourse of a science classroom. Research in Science Education, 29, 2549.
  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Re-thinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529552.
  • Warren, B. & Rosebery, A.S. (1996). “This question is just too, too easy!” Students' perspectives on accountability in science. In L.Schauble & R.Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning new environments for education (pp. 97125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wideen, M.F., O'Shea, T., Pye, I., & Ivany, G. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science. Canadian Journal of Education, 22, 428444.
  • Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99149.