SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. (2002). Retrieved April 26, 2002 from: http://2000survey.horizon-research.com/.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., & Akerson, V.L. (2004). Learning about Nature of Science as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785810.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417436.
  • Abell, S.K., & Smith, D.C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475487.
  • Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295317.
  • Akerson, V.L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F.S. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A year long case study of a fourth grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 10251049.
  • Akerson, V.L., & Hanuscin, D. (2005). A collaborative endeavor to teach the nature of scientific inquiry: There's more to science than meets the “I”. In R.A.Yager (Ed.), Exemplary science: Best practices in professional development. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Atwater, M.M., Gardener, C., & Kight, C.R. (1991). Beliefs and attitudes of urban primary teachers toward physical science and teaching physical science. Journal of Elementary Science Teaching, 3, 311.
  • Bandura, A. (1991. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Barrow, L.H., & Sawanakunanont, Y. (1994). Teaching strategies utilized one year after participating in an inservice elementary science program. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 6, 5262.
  • Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “Ideas-About-Science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655682.
  • Barufaldi, J.P., Bethel, L.J., & Lamb, W.G. (1977). The effect of a science methods course on the philosophical view of science among elementary education majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 289294.
  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.
  • Bianchini, J.A., & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 177209.
  • Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education (3rd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Carspecken, P.F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
  • Colburn, A. (2000, March). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 37, 4244.
  • Comerford, J., Green, A., Hollinger, K., Rooney, M., Hanuscin, D., & Akerson, V.L. (2003, February). Adapting curricula to focus on inquiry—What works? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Hoosier Association for Science Teaching, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.
  • Cox, C.A., & Carpenter, J.R. (1989). Improving attitudes toward teaching science and reducing science anxiety through increasing confidence in science ability in inservice elementary school teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 1, 1434.
  • Duschl, R.A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215251.
  • Fleury, S.C., & Bentley, M.L. (1991). Educating elementary science teachers: Alternative conceptions of the nature of science. Teaching Education, 3, 5767.
  • Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121134.
  • Green, A., Hollinger, K., Rooney, M., Akerson, V.L., & Hanuscin, D. (2004, February). The myth of the scientific method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Hoosier Association of Science Teachers, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.
  • Griffiths, A.K., & Barman, C.R. (1995). High school students' views about the nature of science: Results from three countries. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 248255.
  • Harty, H., Samuel, J.V., & Andersen, H.O. (1991). Understanding the nature of science and attitudes toward science and science teaching of preservice elementary teachers in three preparation sequences. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 3, 1322.
  • Henriques, L. (1998). Maximizing the impact of your in-service: Designing the inservice and selecting the participants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Harmon, H.L. (2001). Attracting and retaining teachers in rural areas. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Dallas, TX.
  • Hollinger, K., & Akerson, V.L. (2006). Putting the question first: Adapting science curricula in the kindergarten classroom. In R.E.Yager & S.K. Enger (Eds.), Exemplary science in grades PreK-4: Standards-based success stories (pp. 18). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Indiana Department of Education. (2000). Indiana's academic standards, teachers' edition. Indiana. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
  • Kielborn, T.L., & Gilmer, P.J. (Eds.) (1999). Meaningful science: Teachers doing inquiry + teaching science. Tallahassee, FL: SERVE.
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F.S. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth' graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551578.
  • Leach, J., Driver, R., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1997). A study of progression in learning about 'the nature of science': Issues of conceptualization and methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 147166.
  • Lederman, J.S., & Khisfe, R. (2002). Views of nature of science, Form D. Unpublished paper. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
  • Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331359.
  • Lederman, N.G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916929.
  • Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83126). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497521.
  • Lederman, J.S., & Khisfe, R. (2002). Views of the nature of science, Form D. Unpublished paper. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
  • Lederman, J., Akerson, V.L., & Goldston, D. (2004, November). Elementary science make and take. Organized panel of preservice and inservice teachers presenting activities at the National Science Teachers Association, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., & Love, N. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Luft, J.A., & Pizzini, E.L. (1998). The demonstration classroom in-service: Changes in the classroom. Science Education, 82, 147162.
  • McComas, W. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 1016.
  • McKenna, G. (1998). Mentor training: The key to effective staff development. Principal, 77, 4749.
  • Meichtry, Y.J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389407.
  • Moscovici, H., & Nelson, T.H. (1998). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry. Science and Children, 35, 1417.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Perkes, V.A. (1975). Relationships between a teacher's background and sensed adequacy to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 8588.
  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77, 261278.
  • Rooney, M., & Hanuscin, D. (2006). “Re-inventing” science instruction: Inquiry-based instruction in a 5th/6th grade classroom. In R.E.Yager (Ed.), Exemplary science in grades 5–8: Standards-based success stories. Arlington VA: NSTA Press.
  • Schoeneberger, M., & Russell, T. (1986). Elementary science as a little added frill: A report of two case studies. Science Education, 70, 519538.
  • Schwartz, R.S., & Lederman, N.G. (2002). “It's the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 205236.
  • Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G., & Crawford, B.S. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610645.
  • Smith, L.L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M.G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 349422.
  • Tobin, K. (2000). Interpretive research in science education. In A.Kelly & R.Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Wang, J. (2001). Improving elementary teachers' understandings of the nature of science and instructional practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
  • Welch, W.W., Klopfer, L.E., & Aikenhead, G.E. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65, 3350.
  • Young, E. (1992). Seven blind mice. New York: Scholastic.
  • Zimpher, N.L., & Rieger, S.R. (1988). Mentoring teachers: What are the issues? Theory into Practice, 27, 175182.