SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Libby Gerard, Camillia Matuk, Kevin McElhaney, Marcia C. Linn, Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education, Educational Research Review, 2015, 15, 41

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Melissa L. Shirley, Karen E. Irving, Connected Classroom Technology Facilitates Multiple Components of Formative Assessment Practice, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 1, 56

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Amelia Wenk Gotwals, Daniel Birmingham, Eliciting, Identifying, Interpreting, and Responding to Students’ Ideas: Teacher Candidates’ Growth in Formative Assessment Practices, Research in Science Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Erratum, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2015, 34, 2
  5. 5
    Vicente Talanquer, Molly Bolger, Debra Tomanek, Exploring prospective teachers' assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 5
  6. 6
    Berit S. Haug, Marianne Ødegaard, Formative Assessment and Teachers' Sensitivity to Student Responses, International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37, 4, 629

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Jordan Harshman, Ellen Yezierski, Guiding teaching with assessments: high school chemistry teachers’ use of data-driven inquiry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2015, 16, 1, 93

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Vicente Talanquer, La importancia de la evaluación formativa, Educación Química, 2015,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Comfort M. Ateh, Science Teachers' Elicitation Practices: Insights for Formative Assessment, Educational Assessment, 2015, 20, 2, 112

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Tara Barnhart, Elizabeth van Es, Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2015, 45, 83

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Jonathan M. Vitale, Kevin Lai, Marcia C. Linn, Taking advantage of automated assessment of student-constructed graphs in science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  12. 12
    Camillia F. Matuk, Marcia C. Linn, Bat-Sheva Eylon, Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units, Instructional Science, 2015, 43, 2, 229

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Marianne Ødegaard, Berit Haug, Sonja M. Mork, Gard Ove Sørvik, Challenges and Support When Teaching Science Through an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Approach, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 18, 2997

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    HOSUN KANG, JESSICA THOMPSON, MARK WINDSCHITL, Creating Opportunities for Students to Show What They Know: The Role of Scaffolding in Assessment Tasks, Science Education, 2014, 98, 4
  15. 15
    Berit S. Haug, Inquiry-Based Science: Turning Teachable Moments into Learnable Moments, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014, 25, 1, 79

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Anastasiya A. Lipnevich, Leigh N. McCallen, Katharine Pace Miles, Jeffrey K. Smith, Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment, Instructional Science, 2014, 42, 4, 539

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Anne Davies, Kathy Busick, Sandra Herbst, Ann Sherman, System leaders using assessment for learning as both the change and the change process: developing theory from practice, The Curriculum Journal, 2014, 25, 4, 567

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Janneke van de Pol, Monique Volman, Frans Oort, Jos Beishuizen, Teacher Scaffolding in Small-Group Work: An Intervention Study, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2014, 23, 4, 600

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Jennifer Evarts Lineback, The Redirection: An Indicator of How Teachers Respond to Student Thinking, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Edward G. Lyon, K-12 Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Vicente Talanquer, Debra Tomanek, Ingrid Novodvorsky, Assessing students' understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  22. 22
    Heidi B. Meindertsma, Marijn W. G. van Dijk, Henderien W. Steenbeek, Paul L. C. van Geert, Assessment of Preschooler’s Scientific Reasoning in Adult–Child Interactions: What Is the Optimal Context?, Research in Science Education, 2013,

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Edward Geaney Lyon, Conceptualizing and Exemplifying Science Teachers' Assessment Expertise, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 7, 1208

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Lynda C. Wood, Jazlin Ebenezer, Relena Boone, Effects of an intellectually caring model on urban African American alternative high school students' conceptual change and achievement in chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2013, 14, 4, 390

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Stephen B. Witzig, Sharyn K. Freyermuth, Marcelle A. Siegel, Kemal Izci, J. Chris Pires, Is DNA Alive? A Study of Conceptual Change Through Targeted Instruction, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 4, 1361

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    EDWARD G. LYON, Learning to Assess Science in Linguistically Diverse Classrooms: Tracking Growth in Secondary Science Preservice Teachers’ Assessment Expertise, Science Education, 2013, 97, 3
  27. 27
    MIN-HSIEN LEE, TZUNG-JIN LIN, CHIN-CHUNG TSAI, Proving or Improving Science Learning? Understanding High School Students’ Conceptions of Science Assessment in Taiwan, Science Education, 2013, 97, 2
  28. 28
    Aisha Kawalkar, Jyotsna Vijapurkar, Scaffolding Science Talk: The role of teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 12, 2004

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Janneke van de Pol, Ed Elbers, Scaffolding student learning: A micro-analysis of teacher–student interaction, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2013, 2, 1, 32

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Edward G. Lyon, Approaches and Strategies in Next Generation Science Learning, 2013,

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Stephen J. Pape, Karen E. Irving, Douglas T. Owens, Christy K. Boscardin, Vehbi A. Sanalan, A. Louis Abrahamson, Sukru Kaya, Hye Sook Shin, David Silver, Classroom connectivity in Algebra I classrooms: results of a randomized control trial, Effective Education, 2012, 4, 2, 169

    CrossRef

  32. You have free access to this content32
    Joan I. Heller, Kirsten R. Daehler, Nicole Wong, Mayumi Shinohara, Luke W. Miratrix, Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 3
  33. 33
    Daniel M. Gottheiner, Marcelle A. Siegel, Experienced Middle School Science Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Investigating Knowledge of Students’ Conceptions in Genetics and Ways to Shape Instruction, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2012, 23, 5, 531

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Neal Kingston, Brooke Nash, How Many Formative Assessment Angels Can Dance on the Head of a Meta-Analytic Pin: .2, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2012, 31, 4
  35. 35
    Derek C. Briggs, Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Erin Furtak, Lorrie Shepard, Yue Yin, Meta-Analytic Methodology and Inferences About the Efficacy of Formative Assessment, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2012, 31, 4
  36. 36
    Janneke van de Pol, Monique Volman, Jos Beishuizen, Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2012, 28, 2, 193

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Neal Kingston, Brooke Nash, Formative Assessment: A Meta-Analysis and a Call for Research, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2011, 30, 4
  38. 38
    Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2011, 37, 1, 15

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Richard Duschl, Seungho Maeng, Asli Sezen, Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis, Studies in Science Education, 2011, 47, 2, 123

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Janneke van de Pol, Monique Volman, Jos Beishuizen, Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher–student interaction, Learning and Instruction, 2011, 21, 1, 46

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl, Tammy Tasker, Barbara White, Pedagogical Practices to Support Classroom Cultures of Scientific Inquiry, Cognition and Instruction, 2011, 29, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Marcelle A. Siegel, Cathy Wissehr, Preparing for the Plunge: Preservice Teachers’ Assessment Literacy, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2011, 22, 4, 371

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Karleen Goubeaud, How is Science Learning Assessed at the Postsecondary Level? Assessment and Grading Practices in College Biology, Chemistry and Physics, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2010, 19, 3, 237

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Gayle A. Buck, Amy Trauth-Nare, Juliann Kaftan, Making formative assessment discernable to pre-service teachers of science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47, 4
  45. 45
    Meghan Phelps, Real-Time Teaching and Learning, Kappa Delta Pi Record, 2010, 46, 3, 132

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Libby F. Gerard, Michele Spitulnik, Marcia C. Linn, Teacher use of evidence to customize inquiry science instruction, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47, 9
  47. 47
    Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Min Li, Shin-Ping Tsai, Julie Schneider, Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students' scientific explanations and student learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47, 5
  48. 48
    Jazlin Ebenezer, Sheela Chacko, Osman Nafiz Kaya, Satya Kiran Koya, Devairakkam Luke Ebenezer, The effects of Common Knowledge Construction Model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47, 1
  49. 49
    Joëlle Morrissette, Un panorama de la recherche sur l’évaluation formative des apprentissages, Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 2010, 33, 3, 1

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Eunlim Chi, Exploring the Factors and Key Aspects of Teachers' Feedback Practice, Asian Journal of Education, 2009, 10, 3, 77

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Joëlle Morrissette, La portée d’une perspective socioculturelle de l’évaluation formative, Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 2009, 32, 2, 1

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    William R. Penuel, Lawrence P. Gallagher, Preparing Teachers to Design Instruction for Deep Understanding in Middle School Earth Science, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2009, 18, 4, 461

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    Gayle A. Buck, Amy E. Trauth-Nare, Preparing Teachers to Make the Formative Assessment Process Integral to Science Teaching and Learning, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2009, 20, 5, 475

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Erin Marie Furtak, Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Making students' thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An analysis of formative assessment prompts, Science Education, 2008, 92, 5
  55. 55
    Erin Marie Furtak, Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Jonathan T. Shemwell, Carlos C. Ayala, Paul R. Brandon, Richard J. Shavelson, Yue Yin, On the Fidelity of Implementing Embedded Formative Assessments and Its Relation to Student Learning, Applied Measurement in Education, 2008, 21, 4, 360

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Valerie K. Otero, Mitchell J. Nathan, Preservice elementary teachers' views of their students' prior knowledge of science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008, 45, 4