SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Black, P. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21, 4997.
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 774.
  • Brophy, J.E., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328375). New York: Macmillan.
  • Cazden, C.B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.
  • Clarke, S. (2000, April). Closing the gap through feedback in formative assessment: Effective distance marking in elementary schools in England. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting. New Orleans, LA.
  • Curriculum Research and Development Group. (2003). Foundational approaches in science teaching I. Retrieved June 1, 2004, from www.hawaii.edu/crdg/FAST.pdf
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Duschl, R.A. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. In R.Millar, J.Leach, & J.Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Duschl, R.A. (2003). Assessment of inquiry. In J.M.Atkin & J.E.Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 4159). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association Press.
  • Duschl, R.A., & Gitomer, D.H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4, 3773.
  • Duschl, R.A., & Grandy, R.E. (2005, February). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. Paper presented at the Inquiry Conference on Developing a Consensus Research Agenda, Piscataway, NJ.
  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
  • Edwards, A.D., & Westgate, D.P.G. (1994). Investigating classroom talk (2nd ed.). London: Westgate.
  • Kelly, G.J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81, 533559.
  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 11211134.
  • Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Markham, E.M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643655.
  • Marks, G., & Mousley, J. (1990). Mathematics education and genre: Dare we make the process writing mistake again? Language and Education, 4, 117135.
  • Martin, J.R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Martin, J.R. (1993). Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In M.A.K.Halliday & J.R.Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 166202). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • National Research Council. (1999). The assessment of science meets the science of assessment. Board on Testing and Assessment Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2001). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261290.
  • O'Connor, M.C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318335.
  • Pottenger, F., & Young, D. (1992). FAST 1: The local environment. Manoa, HI: Curriculum Research and Development Group, University of Hawaii.
  • Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 413.
  • Resnick, L.B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C.M., Wathen, S.H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347364.
  • Redfield, D.L., & Rousseau, E.W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 511, 237245.
  • Rogg, S., & Kahle, J.B. (1997). Middle level standards-based inventory. Oxford, OH: University of Ohio, Miami.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student response. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 709736.
  • Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119144.
  • Sadler, D.R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5, 7784.
  • Sawyer, R.K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 1220.
  • Schwab, J.J. (1962). The concept of the structure of a discipline. The Educational Record, 43, 197205.
  • Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskyian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 4580.
  • Shavelson, R.J., Black, P., Wiliam, D., & Coffey, J. On aligning summative and formative functions in the design of large-scale assessment systems. Paper submitted for publication.
  • Shavelson, R.J., & Young, D. (2000). Embedding assessments in the FAST curriculum: On the beginning the romance among curriculum, teaching and assessment. Proposal submitted at the Elementary, Secondary and Informal Education Division at the National Science Foundation.
  • Shepard, L. (2003). Reconsidering large-scale assessment to heighten its relevance to learning. In J.M.Atkin & J.E.Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 121146). Washington, DC. National Science Teachers Association Press.
  • van Zee, E.H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159190.
  • Yin, Y. (2004). Formative assessment influence on students' science learning and motivation. Proposal to the American Educational Research Association.
  • Zellenmayer, M. (1989). The study of teachers' written feedback to students' writing: Changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instructional Science, 18, 145165.