SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Wei Luo, Jon Pelletier, Kirk Duffin, Carol Ormand, Wei-chen Hung, David J. Shernoff, Xiaoming Zhai, Ellen Iverson, Kyle Whalley, Courtney Gallaher, Walter Furness, Advantages of Computer Simulation in Enhancing Students' Learning About Landform Evolution: A Case Study Using the Grand Canyon, Journal of Geoscience Education, 2016, 64, 1, 60

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Pierre Chastenay, From Geocentrism to Allocentrism: Teaching the Phases of the Moon in a Digital Full-Dome Planetarium, Research in Science Education, 2016, 46, 1, 43

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Reece Mills, Louisa Tomas, Brian Lewthwaite, Learning in Earth and space science: a review of conceptual change instructional approaches, International Journal of Science Education, 2016, 38, 5, 767

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Christopher A. Rates, Bridget K. Mulvey, David F. Feldon, Promoting Conceptual Change for Complex Systems Understanding: Outcomes of an Agent-Based Participatory Simulation, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2016,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Kai-Yu Tang, Chin-Chung Tsai, The Intellectual Structure of Research on Educational Technology in Science Education (ETiSE): A Co-citation Network Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals (2008–2013), Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2016, 25, 2, 327

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Niwat Srisawasdi, Improving K-12 STEM Education Outcomes through Technological Integration, 2016,

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Wendy Nielsen, Garry Hoban, Designing a digital teaching resource to explain phases of the moon: A case study of preservice elementary teachers making a slowmation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 9
  8. 8
    Niwat Srisawasdi, Patcharin Panjaburee, Exploring effectiveness of simulation-based inquiry learning in science with integration of formative assessment, Journal of Computers in Education, 2015, 2, 3, 323

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Jennifer L. Chiu, Crystal J. DeJaegher, Jie Chao, The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties, Computers & Education, 2015, 85, 59

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Randy Yerrick, Carl Lund, Yonghee Lee, STEM Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2015,

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Italo Testa, Silvio Leccia, Emanuella Puddu, Astronomy textbook images: do they really help students?, Physics Education, 2014, 49, 3, 332

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Matthew H. Schneps, Jonathan Ruel, Gerhard Sonnert, Mary Dussault, Michael Griffin, Philip M. Sadler, Conceptualizing astronomical scale: Virtual simulations on handheld tablet computers reverse misconceptions, Computers & Education, 2014, 70, 269

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Gwen Noteborn, Amber Dailey-Hebert, Katerina Bohle Carbonell, Wim Gijselaers, Essential knowledge for academic performance: Educating in the virtual world to promote active learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2014, 37, 217

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Noemi Waight, Ming Ming Chiu, Melinda Whitford, Factors that Influence Science Teachers’ Selection and Usage of Technologies in High School Science Classrooms, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 5, 668

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Binbin Zheng, Mark Warschauer, Jin Kyoung Hwang, Penelope Collins, Laptop Use, Interactive Science Software, and Science Learning Among At-Risk Students, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 4, 591

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Mesut Saçkes, Kathy Cabe Trundle, Preservice Early Childhood Teachers’ Learning of Science in a Methods Course: Examining the Predictive Ability of an Intentional Learning Model, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014, 25, 4, 413

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Niwat Srisawasdi, Siriporn Kroothkeaw, Supporting students’ conceptual development of light refraction by simulation-based open inquiry with dual-situated learning model, Journal of Computers in Education, 2014, 1, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Ton de Jong, The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum, Cognition and Instruction, 2014, 32, 2, 101

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Lara K. Smetana, Randy L. Bell, Which Setting to Choose: Comparison of Whole-Class vs. Small-Group Computer Simulation Use, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 4, 481

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Thomas C. Hammond, R. Curby Alexander, Alec M. Bodzin, K-12 Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Lynn Bell, Nicole Juersivich, Thomas C. Hammond, Randy L. Bell, K-12 Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Maggie D. Renken, Narina Nunez, Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual understanding, Learning and Instruction, 2013, 23, 10

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Bas Kollöffel, Ton Jong, Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Lab, Journal of Engineering Education, 2013, 102, 3
  24. 24
    Hüseyin Küçüközer, Designing a powerful learning environment to promote durable conceptual change, Computers & Education, 2013, 68, 482

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Randy Yerrick, Carl Lund, Yonghee Lee, Exploring Simulator Use in the Preparation of Chemical Engineers, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 3, 362

    CrossRef

  26. You have free access to this content26
    Randy L. Bell, Jennifer L. Maeng, Ian C. Binns, Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 3
  27. 27
    Jennifer L. Maeng, Bridget K. Mulvey, Lara K. Smetana, Randy L. Bell, Preservice Teachers’ TPACK: Using Technology to Support Inquiry Instruction, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 6, 838

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Bekele Gashe Dega, Jeanne Kriek, Temesgen Fereja Mogese, Students' conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  29. 29
    Siriporn Kroothkaew, Niwat Srisawasdi, Teaching How Light can be Refracted Using Simulation-based Inquiry with a Dual-situated Learning Model, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 93, 2023

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Jongpil Cheon, Sangno Lee, Walter Smith, Jaeki Song, Yongjin Kim, The Determination of Children’s Knowledge of Global Lunar Patterns from Online Essays Using Text Mining Analysis, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 2, 667

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Richard L. Lamb, Len Annetta, The Use of Online Modules and the Effect on Student Outcomes in a High School Chemistry Class, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 5, 603

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Jerry P. Suits, Niwat Srisawasdi, Pedagogic Roles of Animations and Simulations in Chemistry Courses, 2013,

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Akın Efendioğlu, Courseware development model (CDM): The effects of CDM on primary school pre-service teachers' achievements and attitudes, Computers & Education, 2012, 59, 2, 687

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Audcharaporn Gunhaart, Niwat Srisawasdi, Effect of Integrated Compute-based Laboratory Environment On Students’ Physics Conceptual Learning of Sound Wave Properties, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 46, 5750

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Noemi Waight, Fouad Abd-El-Khalick, Nature of Technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 18, 2875

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Nico Rutten, Wouter R. van Joolingen, Jan T. van der Veen, The learning effects of computer simulations in science education, Computers & Education, 2012, 58, 1, 136

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Li-Fen Lin, Ying-Shao Hsu, Yi-Fen Yeh, The Role of Computer Simulation in an Inquiry-Based Learning Environment: Reconstructing Geological Events as Geologists, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012, 21, 3, 370

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Kevin Pyatt, Rod Sims, Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012, 21, 1, 133

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Thomas C. Hammond, R. Curby Alexander, Alec M. Bodzin, Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact, 2012,

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    David A. Slykhuis, Rebecca McNall Krall, Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact, 2012,

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Lynn Bell, Nicole Juersivich, Thomas C. Hammond, Randy L. Bell, Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact, 2012,

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Arthur Louis Odom, Jacob M. Marszalek, Elizabeth R. Stoddard, Jerzy M. Wrobel, Computers and Traditional Teaching Practices: Factors influencing middle level students’ science achievement and attitudes about science, International Journal of Science Education, 2011, 1

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Sedat Ucar, Kathy Cabe Trundle, Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data, Computers & Education, 2011, 57, 2, 1571

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Jazlin Ebenezer, Osman Nafiz Kaya, Devairakkam Luke Ebenezer, Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 1
  45. 45
    Noemi Waight, Fouad Abd-El-Khalick, From scientific practice to high school science classrooms: Transfer of scientific technologies and realizations of authentic inquiry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 1
  46. 46
    Anthony Lelliott, Marissa Rollnick, Big Ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974–2008, International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32, 13, 1771

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Julia D. Plummer, Valerie M. Zahm, Rebecca Rice, Inquiry and Astronomy: Preservice Teachers’ Investigations of Celestial Motion, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2010, 21, 4, 471

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Akın Efendioğlu, Tuğba Yanpar Yelken, Programmed instruction versus meaningful learning theory in teaching basic structured query language (SQL) in computer lesson, Computers & Education, 2010, 55, 3, 1287

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Kathy Cabe Trundle, Ronald K. Atwood, John E. Christopher, Mesut Sackes, The Effect of Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Middle School Students’ Understanding of Lunar Concepts, Research in Science Education, 2010, 40, 3, 451

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Ximena C. Cid, Ramon E. Lopez, The Impact of Stereo Display on Student Understanding of Phases of the Moon, Astronomy Education Review, 2010, 9, 1

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Kathy Cabe Trundle, Randy L. Bell, The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study, Computers & Education, 2010, 54, 4, 1078

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Hatice Zeynep Inan, Kathy Cabe Trundle, Rebecca Kantor, Understanding natural sciences education in a Reggio Emilia-inspired preschool, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47, 10
  53. 53
    Sally M. Hobson, Kathy Cabe Trundle, Mesut Saçkes, Using a Planetarium Software Program to Promote Conceptual Change with Young Children, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2010, 19, 2, 165

    CrossRef

  54. You have free access to this content54
    Julia D. Plummer, Early elementary students' development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009, 46, 2
  55. 55
    Lei Liu, Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009, 46, 9