SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    SUFEN CHEN, WEN-HUA CHANG, CHIH-HUNG LAI, CHENG-YUE TSAI, A Comparison of Students’ Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation-Based and Microcomputer-Based Laboratories, Science Education, 2014, 98, 5
  2. 2
    Ileana M. Greca, Eugenia Seoane, Irene Arriassecq, Epistemological Issues Concerning Computer Simulations in Science and Their Implications for Science Education, Science & Education, 2014, 23, 4, 897

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Edriss Ahmed Ali, ICT in engineering educational content delivery: Challenges and opportunities, QScience Proceedings, 2014, 2014, 3, 4

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Mads T Bonde, Guido Makransky, Jakob Wandall, Mette V Larsen, Mikkel Morsing, Hanne Jarmer, Morten O A Sommer, Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations, Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32, 7, 694

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    A.W. Lazonder, S. Ehrenhard, Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2014, 30, 2
  6. 6
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Ton de Jong, The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum, Cognition and Instruction, 2014, 32, 2, 101

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Insook Han, Embodiment: A New Perspective for Evaluating Physicality in Learning, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2013, 49, 1, 41

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Randy Yerrick, Carl Lund, Yonghee Lee, Exploring Simulator Use in the Preparation of Chemical Engineers, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 3, 362

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, How do students in an innovative principle-based mechanics course understand energy concepts?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  10. 10
    Georgios Olympiou, Zacharia Zacharias, Ton deJong, Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation, Instructional Science, 2013, 41, 3, 575

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    T. de Jong, M. C. Linn, Z. C. Zacharia, Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education, Science, 2013, 340, 6130, 305

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Marcia C. Linn, Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 7
  13. 13
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Teacher guidance to mediate student inquiry through interactive dynamic visualizations, Instructional Science, 2013, 41, 5, 895

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Kent J. Crippen, Leanna M. Archambault, Cindy L. Kern, The Nature of Laboratory Learning Experiences in Secondary Science Online, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 3, 1029

    CrossRef

  15. You have free access to this content15
    Georgios Olympiou, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students' conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation, Science Education, 2012, 96, 1
  16. 16
    Vanessa D. I. Pfeiffer, Katharina Scheiter, Sven Gemballa, Comparing and combining traditional teaching approaches and the use of video clips for learning how to identify species in an aquarium, Journal of Biological Education, 2012, 46, 3, 140

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Lara Kathleen Smetana, Randy L. Bell, Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 9, 1337

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Jacquelyn J. Chini, Adrian Madsen, Elizabeth Gire, N. Sanjay Rebello, Sadhana Puntambekar, Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory, Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2012, 8, 1

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Eleni Loizou, Marios Papaevripidou, Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students?, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2012, 27, 3, 447

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Kevin Pyatt, Rod Sims, Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012, 21, 1, 133

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Tomi Jaakkola, Sami Nurmi, Koen Veermans, A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 1
  22. 22
    Ioannis Lefkos, Dimitris Psillos, Euripides Hatzikraniotis, Designing experiments on thermal interactions by secondary-school students in a simulated laboratory environment, Research in Science & Technological Education, 2011, 29, 2, 189

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Kevin W. McElhaney, Marcia C. Linn, Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 7
  24. 24
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Georgios Olympiou, Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning, Learning and Instruction, 2011, 21, 3, 317

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü, Ilbilge Dökme, The effect of three different teaching tools in science education on the students’ attitudes towards computer, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 15, 2652

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Mohammad Reza Farrokhnia, Ayoub Esmailpour, A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students’ conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity laboratory, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, 2, 2, 5474

    CrossRef