SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Grant Williams, John Clement, Identifying Multiple Levels of Discussion-Based Teaching Strategies for Constructing Scientific Models, International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37, 1, 82

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Jennifer Donovan, Carole Haeusler, Cases on Research-Based Teaching Methods in Science Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Lin Xiang, Cynthia Passmore, A Framework for Model-Based Inquiry Through Agent-Based Programming, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Niem Tu Huynh, Michael Solem, Sarah Witham Bednarz, A Road Map for Learning Progressions Research in Geography, Journal of Geography, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Zhihui H. Zhang, Shu-Yuan Chang, Adaptation of an Inquiry Visualization Curriculum and its Impact on Chemistry Learning, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2014, 23, 3, 605

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Paula Cristina Cardoso Mendonça, Rosária Justi, An instrument for analyzing arguments produced in modeling-based chemistry lessons, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 2
  7. 7
    María Isabel Hernández, Digna Couso, Roser Pintó, Analyzing Students’ Learning Progressions Throughout a Teaching Sequence on Acoustic Properties of Materials with a Model-Based Inquiry Approach, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Moritz Krell, Bianca Reinisch, Dirk Krüger, Analyzing Students’ Understanding of Models and Modeling Referring to the Disciplines Biology, Chemistry, and Physics, Research in Science Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Juliane Grünkorn, Annette Upmeier zu Belzen, Dirk Krüger, Assessing Students' Understandings of Biological Models and their Use in Science to Evaluate a Theoretical Framework, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 10, 1651

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Chr.Th. Nicolaou, C.P. Constantinou, Assessment of the modeling competence: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research, Educational Research Review, 2014, 13, 52

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Anne-Marie Hoskinson, Brian A. Couch, Benjamin M. Zwickl, Kathleen A. Hinko, Marcos D. Caballero, Bridging physics and biology teaching through modeling, American Journal of Physics, 2014, 82, 5, 434

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Julia D. Plummer, L. Maynard, Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students' reasoning about the seasons, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 7
  13. 13
    Alfred R. Schademan, BUILDING CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A CULTURAL PRACTICE AND MODELING IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Zuhao Wang, Shaohui Chi, Kaiyan Hu, Wenting Chen, Chemistry Teachers’ Knowledge and Application of Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 2, 211

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Leticia Gallegos-Cázares, Fernando Flores-Camacho, Elena Calderón-Canales, Elvia Perrusquía-Máximo, Beatriz García-Rivera, Children’s Models about Colours in Nahuatl-Speaking Communities, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 5, 699

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Victor R. Lee, Combining High-Speed Cameras and Stop-Motion Animation Software to Support Students’ Modeling of Human Body Movement, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Stella Vosniadou, Irini Skopeliti, Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence, Science & Education, 2014, 23, 7, 1427

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Amy Pallant, Hee-Sun Lee, Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    William R. Penuel, Jere Confrey, Alan Maloney, André A. Rupp, Design Decisions in Developing Learning Trajectories–Based Assessments in Mathematics: A Case Study, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2014, 23, 1, 47

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    William R. Penuel, Emerging Forms of Formative Intervention Research in Education, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2014, 21, 2, 97

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Hayat Hokayem, Christina Schwarz, ENGAGING FIFTH GRADERS IN SCIENTIFIC MODELING TO LEARN ABOUT EVAPORATION AND CONDENSATION, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Feral Ogan-Bekiroğlu, Arzu Arslan, Examination of the Effects of Model-based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 141, 1187

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Examining Learning Through Modeling in K-6 Science Education, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Shinyoung Lee, Heui-Baik Kim, Exploring Secondary Students’ Epistemological Features Depending on the Evaluation Levels of the Group Model on Blood Circulation, Science & Education, 2014, 23, 5, 1075

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Michelle H. Wilkerson-Jerde, Brian E. Gravel, Christopher A. Macrander, Exploring Shifts in Middle School Learners’ Modeling Activity While Generating Drawings, Animations, and Computational Simulations of Molecular Diffusion, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Shinyoung Lee, Eunhee Kang, Heui-Baik Kim, Exploring the Impact of Students’ Learning Approach on Collaborative Group Modeling of Blood Circulation, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Benjamin M. Zwickl, Noah Finkelstein, H. J. Lewandowski, Incorporating learning goals about modeling into an upper-division physics laboratory experiment, American Journal of Physics, 2014, 82, 9, 876

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Cesar Delgado, Navigating Tensions Between Conceptual and Metaconceptual Goals in the Use of Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Robert Lee Mayes, Jennifer Harris Forrester, Jennifer Schuttlefield Christus, Franziska Isabel Peterson, Rachel Bonilla, Nissa Yestness, Quantitative Reasoning in Environmental Science: A learning progression, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 4, 635

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Corey Brady, Nathan Holbert, Firat Soylu, Michael Novak, Uri Wilensky, Sandboxes for Model-Based Inquiry, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Julia D. Plummer, Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression, Studies in Science Education, 2014, 50, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Moritz Krell, Annette Upmeier zu Belzen, Dirk Krüger, Students’ Levels of Understanding Models and Modelling in Biology: Global or Aspect-Dependent?, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 1, 109

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Noemi Waight, Xiufeng Liu, Roberto Ma. Gregorius, Erica Smith, Mihwa Park, Teacher Conceptions and Approaches Associated with an Immersive Instructional Implementation of Computer-Based Models and Assessment in a Secondary Chemistry Classroom, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 3, 467

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Noemi Waight, Kristina Gillmeister, Teachers and Students’ Conceptions of Computer-Based Models in the Context of High School Chemistry: Elicitations at the Pre-intervention Stage, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 2, 335

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    P.-S. Hsu, M. Van Dyke, Y. Chen, T. J. Smith, The effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2014, 30, 6
  36. 36
    Hamin Baek, Christina V. Schwarz, The Influence of Curriculum, Instruction, Technology, and Social Interactions on Two Fifth-Grade Students’ Epistemologies in Modeling Throughout a Model-Based Curriculum Unit, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Ted M. Clark, Julia M. Chamberlain, Use of a PhET Interactive Simulation in General Chemistry Laboratory: Models of the Hydrogen Atom, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 8, 1198

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Chris Quintana, Joseph Krajcik, Using Drawing Technology to Assess Students’ Visualizations of Chemical Reaction Processes, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 3, 355

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Silin Wei, Xiufeng Liu, Yuane Jia, USING RASCH MEASUREMENT TO VALIDATE THE INSTRUMENT OF STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF MODELS IN SCIENCE (SUMS), International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 5, 1067

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Gavin W. Fulmer, VALIDATING PROPOSED LEARNING PROGRESSIONS ON FORCE AND MOTION USING THE FORCE CONCEPT INVENTORY: FINDINGS FROM SINGAPORE SECONDARY SCHOOLS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Mehmet Aydeniz, Kader Bilican, WHAT DO SCIENTISTS KNOW ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE? A CASE STUDY OF NOVICE SCIENTISTS’ VIEWS OF NOS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 5, 1083

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Sam P. Bryfczynski, Michael W. Klymkowsky, Tools of Chemistry Education Research, 2014,

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Agustín Adúriz-Bravo, A ‘Semantic’ View of Scientific Models for Science Education, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 7, 1593

    CrossRef

  44. You have free access to this content44
    Lei Liu, Aaron Rogat, Maria Bertling, A CBAL™ SCIENCE MODEL OF COGNITION: DEVELOPING A COMPETENCY MODEL AND LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TO SUPPORT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT, ETS Research Report Series, 2013, 2013, 2
  45. 45
    José A. Chamizo, A New Definition of Models and Modeling in Chemistry’s Teaching, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 7, 1613

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Benjamin U. Sherrett, Erick J. Nefcy, Edith S. Gummer, Milo D. Koretsky, An Expert Solution to Assess an Industrially Situated, Computer-Enabled Design Project, Journal of Engineering Education, 2013, 102, 4
  47. 47
    Melanie M. Cooper, Leah M. Corley, Sonia M. Underwood, An investigation of college chemistry students' understanding of structure–property relationships, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  48. 48
    Joseph T. Dauer, Jennifer L. Momsen, Elena Bray Speth, Sasha C. Makohon-Moore, Tammy M. Long, Analyzing change in students' gene-to-evolution models in college-level introductory biology, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  49. 49
    Daner Sun, Chee-Kit Looi, Designing a Web-Based Science Learning Environment for Model-Based Collaborative Inquiry, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 1, 73

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W Anderson, Developing a Fine-Grained Learning Progression Framework for Carbon-Transforming Processes, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 10, 1663

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    G. Everaert, I.S. Pauwels, P. Boets, F. Buysschaert, P.L.M. Goethals, Development and assessment of ecological models in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: Key issues for trainers in data-driven modeling approaches, Ecological Informatics, 2013, 17, 111

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Kaiju Kangas, Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Kai Hakkarainen, Figuring the world of designing: Expert participation in elementary classroom, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2013, 23, 2, 425

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    Nicole A. Shea, Ravit Golan Duncan, From Theory to Data: The Process of Refining Learning Progressions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013, 22, 1, 7

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    HSIN-KAI WU, PAI-HSING WU, WEN-XIN ZHANG, YING-SHAO HSU, Investigating College and Graduate Students’ Multivariable Reasoning in Computational Modeling, Science Education, 2013, 97, 3
  55. 55
    Cory T. Forbes, Mandy Biggers, Laura Zangori, Investigating Essential Characteristics of Scientific Practices in Elementary Science Learning Environments: The Practices of Science Observation Protocol (P-SOP), School Science and Mathematics, 2013, 113, 4
  56. 56
    Reuven Lazarowitz, Raphael Naim, Learning the Cell Structures with Three-Dimensional Models: Students’ Achievement by Methods, Type of School and Questions’ Cognitive Level, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 4, 500

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    Ji Shen, David F. Jackson, Measure the Volume of a Tree: A Transformative Modeling Lesson on Measurement for Prospective Middle-school Science Teachers, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2013, 24, 2, 225

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Kurt VanLehn, Model construction as a learning activity: a design space and review, Interactive Learning Environments, 2013, 21, 4, 371

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    Rachel Or-Bach, Bert Bredeweg, Support options provided and required for modeling with DynaLearn—A case study, Education and Information Technologies, 2013, 18, 4, 621

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Pai-Hsing Wu, Hsin-Kai Wu, Che-Yu Kuo, Ying-Shao Hsu, Supporting scientific modeling practices in atmospheric sciences: intended and actual affordances of a computer-based modeling tool, Interactive Learning Environments, 2013, 1

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Yael M. Bamberger, Clara S. Cahill, Teaching Design in Middle-School: Instructors’ Concerns and Scaffolding Strategies, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 2, 171

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Aaron J. Sickel, Stephen B. Witzig, Binaben H. Vanmali, Sandra K. Abell, The Nature of Discourse throughout 5E Lessons in a Large Enrolment College Biology Course, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 2, 637

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Melanie M. Cooper, The New MCAT: An Incentive for Reform or a Lost Opportunity?, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 7, 820

    CrossRef

  64. 64
    Paula Cristina Cardoso Mendonça, Rosária Justi, The Relationships Between Modelling and Argumentation from the Perspective of the Model of Modelling Diagram, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 14, 2407

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Julia Svoboda, Cynthia Passmore, The Strategies of Modeling in Biology Education, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 1, 119

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    Knut Neumann, Tobias Viering, William J. Boone, Hans E. Fischer, Towards a learning progression of energy, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  67. 67
    Emine Adadan, Using Multiple Representations to Promote Grade 11 Students’ Scientific Understanding of the Particle Theory of Matter, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 3, 1079

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Hui Jin, Charles W. Anderson, A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 9
  69. 69
    Kristin L. Gunckel, Beth A. Covitt, Ivan Salinas, Charles W. Anderson, A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 7
  70. 70
    Carolyn S. Wallace, Authoritarian science curriculum standards as barriers to teaching and learning: An interpretation of personal experience, Science Education, 2012, 96, 2
  71. 71
    Ann E. Rivet, Kim A. Kastens, Developing a construct-based assessment to examine students' analogical reasoning around physical models in Earth Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 6
  72. 72
    Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley, Michael W. Klymkowsky, Development and Assessment of a Molecular Structure and Properties Learning Progression, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 11, 1351

    CrossRef

  73. 73
    Shaljan Areepattamannil, Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction on Science Achievement and Interest in Science: Evidence from Qatar, The Journal of Educational Research, 2012, 105, 2, 134

    CrossRef

  74. 74
    Suna Ryu, William A. Sandoval, Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation, Science Education, 2012, 96, 3
  75. 75
    Todd Campbell, Drew Neilson, Modeling Electricity: Model-Based Inquiry with Demonstrations and Investigations, The Physics Teacher, 2012, 50, 6, 347

    CrossRef

  76. 76
    Kimberly Lott, Lynn Wallin, Modeling the States of Matter in a First-Grade Classroom, Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 2012, 49, 4, 108

    CrossRef

  77. 77
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions, Educational Review, 2012, 64, 4, 471

    CrossRef

  78. 78
    Michael W. Klymkowsky, Melanie M. Cooper, Now for the hard part: The path to coherent curricular design, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2012, 40, 4
  79. 79
    Ling L. Liang, Gavin W. Fulmer, David M. Majerich, Richard Clevenstine, Raymond Howanski, The Effects of a Model-Based Physics Curriculum Program with a Physics First Approach: a Causal-Comparative Study, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012, 21, 1, 114

    CrossRef

  80. 80
    April C. Maskiewicz, Victoria A. Winters, Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 4
  81. 81
    Eve Manz, Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge, Science Education, 2012, 96, 6
  82. 82
    Sean A Rands, Using Physical and Computer Simulations of Collective Behaviour as an Introduction to Modelling Concepts for Applied Biologists, Bioscience Education, 2012, 19,

    CrossRef

  83. 83
    Leema K. Berland, Brian J. Reiser, Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation, Science Education, 2011, 95, 2
  84. 84
    Lisa Kenyon, Elizabeth A. Davis, Barbara Hug, Design Approaches to Support Preservice Teachers in Scientific Modeling, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2011, 22, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  85. 85
    Briana E. Crotwell Timmerman, Denise C. Strickland, Robert L. Johnson, John R. Payne, Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates' scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2011, 36, 5, 509

    CrossRef

  86. 86
    Leema K. Berland, Explaining Variation in How Classroom Communities Adapt the Practice of Scientific Argumentation, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2011, 20, 4, 625

    CrossRef

  87. 87
    Julie A. Bianchini, How to foster student–student learning of science? The student, the teacher and the subject matter, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2011, 6, 4, 871

    CrossRef

  88. 88
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Constantinos P. Constantinou, In Quest of productive modeling-based learning discourse in elementary school science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 8
  89. 89
    William J. Pluta, Clark A. Chinn, Ravit Golan Duncan, Learners' epistemic criteria for good scientific models, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 5
  90. 90
    Richard Duschl, Seungho Maeng, Asli Sezen, Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis, Studies in Science Education, 2011, 47, 2, 123

    CrossRef

  91. 91
    J. R. Jungck, Mathematical Biology Education: Modeling Makes Meaning, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 2011, 6, 6, 1

    CrossRef

  92. 92
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Michalis Michael, Constantinos P. Constantinou, Objects, Entities, Behaviors, and Interactions: A Typology of Student-Constructed Computer-Based Models of Physical Phenomena, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2011, 44, 2, 173

    CrossRef

  93. 93
    Phil Seok Oh, Sung Jin Oh, What Teachers of Science Need to Know about Models: An overview, International Journal of Science Education, 2011, 33, 8, 1109

    CrossRef

  94. 94
    Seoung-Hey Paik, Hyeong-Sam Kim, Yu-Haw Han, Seoung-Hey Kim, A Comparison of Instruction Effectiveness between the Experiment of Precipitation and the Experiment with Ball and Stick Model Related to 'Law of Definite Proportions', Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2010, 54, 3, 338

    CrossRef

  95. 95
    Leema K. Berland, Katherine L. McNeill, A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts, Science Education, 2010, 94, 5
  96. 96
    Alicia C. Alonzo, Considerations in Using Learning Progressions to Inform Achievement Level Descriptions, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 2010, 8, 4, 204

    CrossRef

  97. 97
    Victor R. Lee, How different variants of orbit diagrams influence student explanations of the seasons, Science Education, 2010, 94, 6
  98. 98
    Ravit Golan Duncan, Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009, 46, 6