SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Lin Xiang, Cynthia Passmore, A Framework for Model-Based Inquiry Through Agent-Based Programming, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 311

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Niem Tu Huynh, Michael Solem, Sarah Witham Bednarz, A Road Map for Learning Progressions Research in Geography, Journal of Geography, 2015, 114, 2, 69

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Beth Covitt, Diane Friend, Colleen Windell, Julia Baldwin, A Scientific Modeling Sequence for Teaching Earth Seasons, Journal of Geoscience Education, 2015, 63, 1, 7

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    RAVIT GOLAN DUNCAN, AMELIA WENK GOTWALS, A Tale of Two Progressions: On the Benefits of Careful Comparisons, Science Education, 2015, 99, 3
  5. 5
    María Isabel Hernández, Digna Couso, Roser Pintó, Analyzing Students’ Learning Progressions Throughout a Teaching Sequence on Acoustic Properties of Materials with a Model-Based Inquiry Approach, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 356

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Moritz Krell, Bianca Reinisch, Dirk Krüger, Analyzing Students’ Understanding of Models and Modeling Referring to the Disciplines Biology, Chemistry, and Physics, Research in Science Education, 2015, 45, 3, 367

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    David Fortus, LeeAnn M. Sutherland Adams, Joseph Krajcik, Brian Reiser, Assessing the role of curriculum coherence in student learning about energy, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  8. 8
    Chia-Chi Wang, Hsiao-Chi Ho, Ying-Yao Cheng, Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2015, 17, 1

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Katarina Dass, Michelle L. Head, Gregory T. Rushton, Building an Understanding of How Model-Based Inquiry Is Implemented in the High School Chemistry Classroom, Journal of Chemical Education, 2015, 150619065730004

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Victor R. Lee, Combining High-Speed Cameras and Stop-Motion Animation Software to Support Students’ Modeling of Human Body Movement, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 178

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Amy Pallant, Hee-Sun Lee, Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 378

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Hui Jin, HyoJeong Shin, Michele E Johnson, JinHo Kim, Charles W. Anderson, Developing learning progression-based teacher knowledge measures, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  13. 13
    Amber Todd, Lisa Kenyon, Empirical refinements of a molecular genetics learning progression: The molecular constructs, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  14. 14
    Cory T. Forbes, Laura Zangori, Christina V. Schwarz, Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students' model-driven explanation-construction, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  15. 15
    Leema K. Berland, Christina V. Schwarz, Christina Krist, Lisa Kenyon, Abraham S. Lo, Brian J. Reiser, Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  16. 16
    Marios Papaevripidou, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Examining how students’ knowledge of the subject domain affects their process of modeling in a computer programming environment, Journal of Computers in Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Examining Learning Through Modeling in K-6 Science Education, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 192

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Michelle H. Wilkerson-Jerde, Brian E. Gravel, Christopher A. Macrander, Exploring Shifts in Middle School Learners’ Modeling Activity While Generating Drawings, Animations, and Computational Simulations of Molecular Diffusion, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 396

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Shinyoung Lee, Eunhee Kang, Heui-Baik Kim, Exploring the Impact of Students’ Learning Approach on Collaborative Group Modeling of Blood Circulation, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 234

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Grant Williams, John Clement, Identifying Multiple Levels of Discussion-Based Teaching Strategies for Constructing Scientific Models, International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37, 1, 82

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    DAVID HAMMER, TIFFANY-ROSE SIKORSKI, Implications of Complexity for Research on Learning Progressions, Science Education, 2015, 99, 3
  22. 22
    Joseph T. Dauer, Tammy M. Long, Long-term conceptual retrieval by college biology majors following model-based instruction, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  23. 23
    Bahadir Namdar, Ji Shen, Modeling-Oriented Assessment in K-12 Science Education: A synthesis of research from 1980 to 2013 and new directions, International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37, 7, 993

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Cesar Delgado, Navigating Tensions Between Conceptual and Metaconceptual Goals in the Use of Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 132

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    CAROL L. SMITH, MARIANNE WISER, On the Importance of Epistemology–Disciplinary Core Concept Interactions in LPs, Science Education, 2015, 99, 3
  26. 26
    Corey Brady, Nathan Holbert, Firat Soylu, Michael Novak, Uri Wilensky, Sandboxes for Model-Based Inquiry, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 265

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Yvonne G. Mulder, Lars Bollen, Ton de Jong, Ard W. Lazonder, Scaffolding learning by modelling: The effects of partially worked-out models, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  28. 28
    P.-S. Hsu, M. Van Dyke, Y. Chen, T.J. Smith, The effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2015, 31, 1
  29. 29
    Hamin Baek, Christina V. Schwarz, The Influence of Curriculum, Instruction, Technology, and Social Interactions on Two Fifth-Grade Students’ Epistemologies in Modeling Throughout a Model-Based Curriculum Unit, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 216

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Meng-Fei Cheng, David E. Brown, The role of scientific modeling criteria in advancing students' explanatory ideas of magnetism, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  31. 31
    JING-PING JONG, MEI-HUNG CHIU, SHIAO-LAN CHUNG, The Use of Modeling-Based Text to Improve Students' Modeling Competencies, Science Education, 2015, 99, 4
  32. 32
    Suna Ryu, Yuhwha Han, Seoung-Hey Paik, Understanding Co-development of Conceptual and Epistemic Understanding through Modeling Practices with Mobile Internet, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 330

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    W. R. van Joolingen, Annika V. A. Aukes, H. Gijlers, L. Bollen, Understanding Elementary Astronomy by Making Drawing-Based Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 256

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    A. Lynn Stephens, John J. Clement, Use of physics simulations in whole class and small group settings: Comparative case studies, Computers & Education, 2015, 86, 137

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Adam V. Maltese, Joshua A. Danish, Ryan M. Bouldin, Joseph A. Harsh, Branden Bryan, What are students doing during lecture? Evidence from new technologies to capture student activity, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2015, 1

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Jennifer Donovan, Carole Haeusler, STEM Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2015,

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Jennifer Donovan, Carole Haeusler, Cases on Research-Based Teaching Methods in Science Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Min-Seok Ko, Na-Young Kim, Il-Ho Yang, A case study on the conceptual simulation observed in explanation of elementary school students about the causes of the seasonal change, Journal of the Korean society of earth science education, 2014, 7, 1, 43

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Zhihui H. Zhang, Shu-Yuan Chang, Adaptation of an Inquiry Visualization Curriculum and its Impact on Chemistry Learning, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2014, 23, 3, 605

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Min-Seok Ko, Il-Ho Yang, An Analysis on the Roles and Strategies of Imagistic Simulation Observed in Mental Simulation about Problematic Situations of Prediction, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 3, 247

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Paula Cristina Cardoso Mendonça, Rosária Justi, An instrument for analyzing arguments produced in modeling-based chemistry lessons, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 2
  42. 42
    Juliane Grünkorn, Annette Upmeier zu Belzen, Dirk Krüger, Assessing Students' Understandings of Biological Models and their Use in Science to Evaluate a Theoretical Framework, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 10, 1651

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Chr.Th. Nicolaou, C.P. Constantinou, Assessment of the modeling competence: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research, Educational Research Review, 2014, 13, 52

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Anne-Marie Hoskinson, Brian A. Couch, Benjamin M. Zwickl, Kathleen A. Hinko, Marcos D. Caballero, Bridging physics and biology teaching through modeling, American Journal of Physics, 2014, 82, 5, 434

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Julia D. Plummer, L. Maynard, Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students' reasoning about the seasons, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 7
  46. 46
    Alfred R. Schademan, BUILDING CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A CULTURAL PRACTICE AND MODELING IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Zuhao Wang, Shaohui Chi, Kaiyan Hu, Wenting Chen, Chemistry Teachers’ Knowledge and Application of Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 2, 211

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Leticia Gallegos-Cázares, Fernando Flores-Camacho, Elena Calderón-Canales, Elvia Perrusquía-Máximo, Beatriz García-Rivera, Children’s Models about Colours in Nahuatl-Speaking Communities, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 5, 699

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Stella Vosniadou, Irini Skopeliti, Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence, Science & Education, 2014, 23, 7, 1427

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    William R. Penuel, Jere Confrey, Alan Maloney, André A. Rupp, Design Decisions in Developing Learning Trajectories–Based Assessments in Mathematics: A Case Study, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2014, 23, 1, 47

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Elizabeth Davis, Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar, Anna Maria Arias, Amber Schultz Bismack, Loren Marulis, Stefanie Iwashyna, Designing Educative Curriculum Materials: A Theoretically and Empirically Driven Process, Harvard Educational Review, 2014, 84, 1, 24

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Seungho Maeng, Kiyoung Lee, Young-Shin Park, Jeong-A Lee, Hyunseok Oh, Development and Validation of a Learning Progression for Astronomical Systems Using Ordered Multiple-Choice Items, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 8, 703

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    William R. Penuel, Emerging Forms of Formative Intervention Research in Education, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2014, 21, 2, 97

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Hayat Hokayem, Christina Schwarz, ENGAGING FIFTH GRADERS IN SCIENTIFIC MODELING TO LEARN ABOUT EVAPORATION AND CONDENSATION, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Feral Ogan-Bekiroğlu, Arzu Arslan, Examination of the Effects of Model-based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 141, 1187

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Shinyoung Lee, Heui-Baik Kim, Exploring Secondary Students’ Epistemological Features Depending on the Evaluation Levels of the Group Model on Blood Circulation, Science & Education, 2014, 23, 5, 1075

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    Benjamin M. Zwickl, Noah Finkelstein, H. J. Lewandowski, Incorporating learning goals about modeling into an upper-division physics laboratory experiment, American Journal of Physics, 2014, 82, 9, 876

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Robert Lee Mayes, Jennifer Harris Forrester, Jennifer Schuttlefield Christus, Franziska Isabel Peterson, Rachel Bonilla, Nissa Yestness, Quantitative Reasoning in Environmental Science: A learning progression, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 4, 635

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    Julia D. Plummer, Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression, Studies in Science Education, 2014, 50, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Moritz Krell, Annette Upmeier zu Belzen, Dirk Krüger, Students’ Levels of Understanding Models and Modelling in Biology: Global or Aspect-Dependent?, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 1, 109

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Noemi Waight, Xiufeng Liu, Roberto Ma. Gregorius, Erica Smith, Mihwa Park, Teacher Conceptions and Approaches Associated with an Immersive Instructional Implementation of Computer-Based Models and Assessment in a Secondary Chemistry Classroom, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 3, 467

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Noemi Waight, Kristina Gillmeister, Teachers and Students’ Conceptions of Computer-Based Models in the Context of High School Chemistry: Elicitations at the Pre-intervention Stage, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 2, 335

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Hey Sook Cho, Jeonghee Nam, Dongwon Lee, The Development of Argument-based Modeling Strategy Using Scientific Writing, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 5, 479

    CrossRef

  64. 64
    Hey Sook Cho, Jeonghee Nam, The Impact of the Argument-based Modeling Strategy using Scientific Writing implemented in Middle School Science, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 6, 583

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Ted M. Clark, Julia M. Chamberlain, Use of a PhET Interactive Simulation in General Chemistry Laboratory: Models of the Hydrogen Atom, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 8, 1198

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    Namsoo Shin, Eun Jung Koh, Chui Im Choi, Dae Hong Jeong, Using a Learning Progression to Characterize Korean Secondary Students' Knowledge and Submicroscopic Representations of the Particle Nature of Matter, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 5, 437

    CrossRef

  67. 67
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Chris Quintana, Joseph Krajcik, Using Drawing Technology to Assess Students’ Visualizations of Chemical Reaction Processes, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 3, 355

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Silin Wei, Xiufeng Liu, Yuane Jia, USING RASCH MEASUREMENT TO VALIDATE THE INSTRUMENT OF STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF MODELS IN SCIENCE (SUMS), International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 5, 1067

    CrossRef

  69. 69
    Gavin W. Fulmer, VALIDATING PROPOSED LEARNING PROGRESSIONS ON FORCE AND MOTION USING THE FORCE CONCEPT INVENTORY: FINDINGS FROM SINGAPORE SECONDARY SCHOOLS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  70. 70
    Mehmet Aydeniz, Kader Bilican, WHAT DO SCIENTISTS KNOW ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE? A CASE STUDY OF NOVICE SCIENTISTS’ VIEWS OF NOS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 5, 1083

    CrossRef

  71. 71
    Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Sam P. Bryfczynski, Michael W. Klymkowsky, Tools of Chemistry Education Research, 2014,

    CrossRef

  72. 72
    Agustín Adúriz-Bravo, A ‘Semantic’ View of Scientific Models for Science Education, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 7, 1593

    CrossRef

  73. You have free access to this content73
    Lei Liu, Aaron Rogat, Maria Bertling, A CBAL™ SCIENCE MODEL OF COGNITION: DEVELOPING A COMPETENCY MODEL AND LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TO SUPPORT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT, ETS Research Report Series, 2013, 2013, 2
  74. 74
    José A. Chamizo, A New Definition of Models and Modeling in Chemistry’s Teaching, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 7, 1613

    CrossRef

  75. 75
    Benjamin U. Sherrett, Erick J. Nefcy, Edith S. Gummer, Milo D. Koretsky, An Expert Solution to Assess an Industrially Situated, Computer-Enabled Design Project, Journal of Engineering Education, 2013, 102, 4
  76. 76
    Melanie M. Cooper, Leah M. Corley, Sonia M. Underwood, An investigation of college chemistry students' understanding of structure–property relationships, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  77. 77
    Minseok Ko, Ilho Yang, Analysis on the Relationship Between the Construct Level of Analogical Reasoning and the Construction of Explanatory Model Observed in Small Group Discussions on Scientific Problem Solving, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2013, 33, 2, 522

    CrossRef

  78. 78
    Joseph T. Dauer, Jennifer L. Momsen, Elena Bray Speth, Sasha C. Makohon-Moore, Tammy M. Long, Analyzing change in students' gene-to-evolution models in college-level introductory biology, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  79. 79
    Daner Sun, Chee-Kit Looi, Designing a Web-Based Science Learning Environment for Model-Based Collaborative Inquiry, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 1, 73

    CrossRef

  80. 80
    Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W Anderson, Developing a Fine-Grained Learning Progression Framework for Carbon-Transforming Processes, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 10, 1663

    CrossRef

  81. 81
    G. Everaert, I.S. Pauwels, P. Boets, F. Buysschaert, P.L.M. Goethals, Development and assessment of ecological models in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: Key issues for trainers in data-driven modeling approaches, Ecological Informatics, 2013, 17, 111

    CrossRef

  82. 82
    Kaiju Kangas, Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Kai Hakkarainen, Figuring the world of designing: Expert participation in elementary classroom, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2013, 23, 2, 425

    CrossRef

  83. 83
    Nicole A. Shea, Ravit Golan Duncan, From Theory to Data: The Process of Refining Learning Progressions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013, 22, 1, 7

    CrossRef

  84. 84
    HSIN-KAI WU, PAI-HSING WU, WEN-XIN ZHANG, YING-SHAO HSU, Investigating College and Graduate Students’ Multivariable Reasoning in Computational Modeling, Science Education, 2013, 97, 3
  85. 85
    Cory T. Forbes, Mandy Biggers, Laura Zangori, Investigating Essential Characteristics of Scientific Practices in Elementary Science Learning Environments: The Practices of Science Observation Protocol (P-SOP), School Science and Mathematics, 2013, 113, 4
  86. 86
    Reuven Lazarowitz, Raphael Naim, Learning the Cell Structures with Three-Dimensional Models: Students’ Achievement by Methods, Type of School and Questions’ Cognitive Level, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 4, 500

    CrossRef

  87. 87
    Ji Shen, David F. Jackson, Measure the Volume of a Tree: A Transformative Modeling Lesson on Measurement for Prospective Middle-school Science Teachers, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2013, 24, 2, 225

    CrossRef

  88. 88
    Kurt VanLehn, Model construction as a learning activity: a design space and review, Interactive Learning Environments, 2013, 21, 4, 371

    CrossRef

  89. 89
    Vicente Talanquer, Progresiones de aprendizaje: promesa y potencial, Educación Química, 2013, 24, 4, 362

    CrossRef

  90. 90
    Rachel Or-Bach, Bert Bredeweg, Support options provided and required for modeling with DynaLearn—A case study, Education and Information Technologies, 2013, 18, 4, 621

    CrossRef

  91. 91
    Pai-Hsing Wu, Hsin-Kai Wu, Che-Yu Kuo, Ying-Shao Hsu, Supporting scientific modeling practices in atmospheric sciences: intended and actual affordances of a computer-based modeling tool, Interactive Learning Environments, 2013, 1

    CrossRef

  92. 92
    Yael M. Bamberger, Clara S. Cahill, Teaching Design in Middle-School: Instructors’ Concerns and Scaffolding Strategies, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 2, 171

    CrossRef

  93. 93
    Aaron J. Sickel, Stephen B. Witzig, Binaben H. Vanmali, Sandra K. Abell, The Nature of Discourse throughout 5E Lessons in a Large Enrolment College Biology Course, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 2, 637

    CrossRef

  94. 94
    Melanie M. Cooper, The New MCAT: An Incentive for Reform or a Lost Opportunity?, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 7, 820

    CrossRef

  95. 95
    Paula Cristina Cardoso Mendonça, Rosária Justi, The Relationships Between Modelling and Argumentation from the Perspective of the Model of Modelling Diagram, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 14, 2407

    CrossRef

  96. 96
    Julia Svoboda, Cynthia Passmore, The Strategies of Modeling in Biology Education, Science & Education, 2013, 22, 1, 119

    CrossRef

  97. 97
    Knut Neumann, Tobias Viering, William J. Boone, Hans E. Fischer, Towards a learning progression of energy, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  98. 98
    Emine Adadan, Using Multiple Representations to Promote Grade 11 Students’ Scientific Understanding of the Particle Theory of Matter, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 3, 1079

    CrossRef

  99. 99
    Hui Jin, Charles W. Anderson, A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 9
  100. 100
    Kristin L. Gunckel, Beth A. Covitt, Ivan Salinas, Charles W. Anderson, A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 7
  101. 101
    Carolyn S. Wallace, Authoritarian science curriculum standards as barriers to teaching and learning: An interpretation of personal experience, Science Education, 2012, 96, 2
  102. 102
    Ann E. Rivet, Kim A. Kastens, Developing a construct-based assessment to examine students' analogical reasoning around physical models in Earth Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 6
  103. 103
    Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley, Michael W. Klymkowsky, Development and Assessment of a Molecular Structure and Properties Learning Progression, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 11, 1351

    CrossRef

  104. 104
    Shaljan Areepattamannil, Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction on Science Achievement and Interest in Science: Evidence from Qatar, The Journal of Educational Research, 2012, 105, 2, 134

    CrossRef

  105. 105
    Suna Ryu, William A. Sandoval, Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation, Science Education, 2012, 96, 3
  106. 106
    Todd Campbell, Drew Neilson, Modeling Electricity: Model-Based Inquiry with Demonstrations and Investigations, The Physics Teacher, 2012, 50, 6, 347

    CrossRef

  107. 107
    Kimberly Lott, Lynn Wallin, Modeling the States of Matter in a First-Grade Classroom, Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 2012, 49, 4, 108

    CrossRef

  108. 108
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions, Educational Review, 2012, 64, 4, 471

    CrossRef

  109. 109
    Michael W. Klymkowsky, Melanie M. Cooper, Now for the hard part: The path to coherent curricular design, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2012, 40, 4
  110. 110
    Ling L. Liang, Gavin W. Fulmer, David M. Majerich, Richard Clevenstine, Raymond Howanski, The Effects of a Model-Based Physics Curriculum Program with a Physics First Approach: a Causal-Comparative Study, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012, 21, 1, 114

    CrossRef

  111. 111
    April C. Maskiewicz, Victoria A. Winters, Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 4
  112. 112
    Eve Manz, Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge, Science Education, 2012, 96, 6
  113. 113
    Sean A Rands, Using Physical and Computer Simulations of Collective Behaviour as an Introduction to Modelling Concepts for Applied Biologists, Bioscience Education, 2012, 19,

    CrossRef

  114. 114
    Leema K. Berland, Brian J. Reiser, Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation, Science Education, 2011, 95, 2
  115. 115
    Lisa Kenyon, Elizabeth A. Davis, Barbara Hug, Design Approaches to Support Preservice Teachers in Scientific Modeling, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2011, 22, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  116. 116
    Briana E. Crotwell Timmerman, Denise C. Strickland, Robert L. Johnson, John R. Payne, Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates' scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2011, 36, 5, 509

    CrossRef

  117. 117
    Leema K. Berland, Explaining Variation in How Classroom Communities Adapt the Practice of Scientific Argumentation, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2011, 20, 4, 625

    CrossRef

  118. 118
    Julie A. Bianchini, How to foster student–student learning of science? The student, the teacher and the subject matter, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2011, 6, 4, 871

    CrossRef

  119. 119
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Constantinos P. Constantinou, In Quest of productive modeling-based learning discourse in elementary school science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 8
  120. 120
    William J. Pluta, Clark A. Chinn, Ravit Golan Duncan, Learners' epistemic criteria for good scientific models, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 5
  121. 121
    Richard Duschl, Seungho Maeng, Asli Sezen, Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis, Studies in Science Education, 2011, 47, 2, 123

    CrossRef

  122. 122
    J. R. Jungck, Mathematical Biology Education: Modeling Makes Meaning, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 2011, 6, 6, 1

    CrossRef

  123. 123
    Loucas T. Louca, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Michalis Michael, Constantinos P. Constantinou, Objects, Entities, Behaviors, and Interactions: A Typology of Student-Constructed Computer-Based Models of Physical Phenomena, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2011, 44, 2, 173

    CrossRef

  124. 124
    Phil Seok Oh, Sung Jin Oh, What Teachers of Science Need to Know about Models: An overview, International Journal of Science Education, 2011, 33, 8, 1109

    CrossRef

  125. 125
    Seoung-Hey Paik, Hyeong-Sam Kim, Yu-Haw Han, Seoung-Hey Kim, A Comparison of Instruction Effectiveness between the Experiment of Precipitation and the Experiment with Ball and Stick Model Related to 'Law of Definite Proportions', Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2010, 54, 3, 338

    CrossRef

  126. 126
    Leema K. Berland, Katherine L. McNeill, A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts, Science Education, 2010, 94, 5
  127. 127
    Alicia C. Alonzo, Considerations in Using Learning Progressions to Inform Achievement Level Descriptions, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 2010, 8, 4, 204

    CrossRef

  128. 128
    Victor R. Lee, How different variants of orbit diagrams influence student explanations of the seasons, Science Education, 2010, 94, 6
  129. 129
    Ravit Golan Duncan, Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009, 46, 6
  130. 130
    Richard Lehrer, Leona Schauble, The Development of Scientific Thinking, Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science,