SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K.McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Carpenter, T.P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E.Fennema & T.A.Romberg (Eds.), Classrooms that promote mathematical understanding (pp. 1932). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Catley, K., Lehrer, R., & Reiser, B. (2005). Tracing a proposed learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. Paper Commissioned for the Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement Center for Education, National Research Council.
  • Corcoran, T.B., Mosher, F.A., & Rogat, A.D. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approcah to reform. (CPRE Report). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  • Duncan, R.G., Rogat, A., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th–10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (this issue).
  • Kennedy, C., Brown, N., Draney, K., & Wilson, M. (2005). Using progress variables and embedded assessments to improve teaching and learning. Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science. In R.Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Education design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 101169). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, W.A. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (this issue).
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2005). Systems for state science assessments. In M.R.Wilson & M.W.Bertenthal (Eds.), Committee on testing design on K-12 science achievement. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grade K-8. In R.A.Duschl, H.A.Schweingruber, & A.W.Shouse (Eds.), Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
  • Reiser, B., Krajcik, J, Moje, E., & Marx, R. (2003). Design strategies for developing science instructional materials. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Schwarz, C.V., Reiser, B.J., Davis, E.A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., et al. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (this issue).
  • Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C.W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications for children's learning for assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement, 14(1&2), 198.
  • Songer, N.B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A.W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (this issue).
  • Steedle, J.T., & Shavelson, R.J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (this issue).
  • Valverde, G.A., & Schmidt, W.H. (2000). Greater expectations: Learning from other countries in the Quest for World-Class Standards in US School Mathematics and Science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(5), 651687.
  • Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (this issue).