Sea Grant Professor of Free-Choice Learning.
Science learning in a leisure setting
Article first published online: 5 AUG 2009
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20319
Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Falk, J. H. and Storksdieck, M. (2010), Science learning in a leisure setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47: 194–212. doi: 10.1002/tea.20319
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 JAN 2010
- Article first published online: 5 AUG 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 MAY 2009
- Manuscript Received: 8 OCT 2007
Funded by
- National Science Foundation. Grant Number: ESI-0125545
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- biology;
- informal science;
- free-choice learning;
- museum education;
- lifelong learning
Abstract
Most people visit a science center in order to satisfy specific leisure-related needs; needs which may or may not actually include science learning. Falk proposed that an individual's identity-related motivations provide a useful lens through which to understand adult free-choice science learning in leisure settings. Over a 3-year period the authors collected in-depth data on a random sample of visitors to a large recently opened, hands-on, interactive science center; collecting information on why people visited, what they did within the science center, what they knew about the subject presented upon entering and exiting, and what each individual's long-term self-perceptions of their own learning was. Presented is a qualitative analysis of visitor interviews collected roughly 2 years after the initial visit. Although there was evidence for a range of science learning outcomes, outcomes did appear to be strongly influenced by visitor's entering identity-related motivations. However, the data also suggested that not only were the motivational goals of a science center visit important in determining outcomes, so too were the criteria by which visitors judged satisfaction of those goals; in particular whether goal satisfaction required external or merely internal validation. The implications for future informal science education research and practice are discussed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 47:194–212, 2010

1098-2736/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=2693ae4b4a7f0fba478ed5b44473ab6a3e39f95c)
1098-2736/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=896a2ba4ee94f7c40454fa06142e5c25371439c0)
1098-2736/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fcb0bc6d9abff1a407c9828e2623a8ca38e12186)