SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Pocket guide to the 2011 annual meeting. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Achieve. (2010). Taking the lead in science education: Forging next-generation science standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://achieve.org/files/InternationalScienceBenchmarkingReport.pdf.
  • Apple, M. W. (1999). Power, meaning and identity. Essays in critical educational studies. New York, NY: Peter Lange.
  • Apple, M. W. (2000). The hidden costs of reform. Educational Policy, 14, 429435.
  • Basic Education Act 628. (1998). Finland.
  • Bryce, T. (2007). Standards in science education: The situation in Scotland. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 255262). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 561580.
  • Carter, L. (2008). Globalisation and science education: The implications of science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 617633.
  • Chiu, M.-H. (2007). Standards for science education in Taiwan. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 303346). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Common Core. (2010). Common core state standards initiative. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.
  • Dolin, J. (2007). Science education standards and science assessment in Denmark. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 7182). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Driessen, H. (2007). Development and evaluation of science standards in the Netherlands. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 221236). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Exploratory Committee on Chemical Education. (2003). Building chemistry: A blueprint to initiate renewal of chemistry programme in upper secondary education in the Netherlands. Enschede, Netherlands: SLO.
  • Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W.Jackson (Ed.). Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789829). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Fensham, P. J. (1997). School science and its problems with scientific literacy. In R.Levinson & J.Thomas (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Galvao, C., Reis, P., Freire, A., & Oliveira, T. (2007). Science curriculum in Portugal: From the development to the evaluation of students' competences. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 237254). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Hurd, P. (2001). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 39.
  • Labudde, P. (2007). How to develop, implement and assess standards in science education: 12 challenges from a Swiss perspective. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 277302). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Langlet, J. (2007). Standards for a lower secondary biology course in Germany: A contribution from MNU. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 165172). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Lavonen, J. (2007). National science education standards and assessment in Finland. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 101126). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2007). Standards for science education in the United States: Necessary evil? In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 347371). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Lord, K. M., & Turekian, V. C. (2007 , February). Time for a new era of science diplomacy. Science, 315(5813), 769770.
  • Malleus, P. (2007). Science education standards in France. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 127146). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Millar, R. (2007). How standards in science education are set and monitored in the English education system. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 83100). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (1998). Grade 1–9 curriculum guidelines. Taipei: Author.
  • Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2003). Grade 1–9 curriculum guidelines: Science and technology learning area. Taipei: Author.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Science framework for the 2009 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.nagb.org/publications/frameworks.htm.
  • National Board of Education. (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004. Helsinki, Finland: National Board of Education. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/?lang=en.
  • National Science Foundation, (2010). Globalization of science and engineering research: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2010. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsb1003/.
  • Nentwig, P., & Waddington, D. (2007). Standards: An international comparison. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 375403). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • OECD. (2004). Denmark: Lessons from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading, and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/32/0,3343,en_2649_39263231_37468320_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  • Perrenoud, P. (1997). Construire des compétences des l'école (building school competence). Paris, France: ESF Éditeur.
  • Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency. (2005). National curriculum. Science. Key Stage 4. Retrieved from http://www.nc.uk.net.
  • Rupp, A., & Vock, M. (2007). National educational standards in Germany: Methodological challenges for developing and calibrating standards-based tests. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 173198). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Sadler, T., & Zeidler, D. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse; Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909921.
  • Schecker, H., & Parchmann, I. (2007). Standards and competence models: The German situation. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 147164). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Scottish Executive. (2006). A curriculum for excellence: Progress and proposals. A paper from the curriculum review board. Edinburgh, UK: Author. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/98764/0023924.pdf.
  • Stromdahl, H. (2007). On standards in science education in the contemporary Swedish school system. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 263276). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report of the national commission on excellence in education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • U.S. Department of Education Institute for Education Sciences. (n.d.). TIMSS eighth-grade released items from 1999 and 2003. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/pdf/TIMSS8_Science_Items.pdf.
  • Waddington, D., Nentwig, P., & Schanze, S. (Eds.). (2007). Making it comparable: Standards in science education. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Weiglhofer, H. (2007). Austria at the beginning of the way to standards in science. In D.Waddington, P.Nentwig, & S.Schanze (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 6170). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Weinert F. E. (Ed.). (2001). Vergleichende Leistungsmessung in schuler—eine umstrittene selbstverstandlichkeit (comparative assessment in schools—A natural controversy). In Leistungsmessungen in schulen (assessment in schools) (pp. 1731). Weinheim and Basel: Belz, Verlag.
  • Westbury, I. (1995). Didaktik and curriculum theory: Are they the two sides of the same coin? In S.Hopmann & K.Riquarts (Eds.). Didaktik and/or curriculum (pp. 233263). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
  • Westbury, I. (1999). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might didaktik teach curriculum? In I.Westbury, S.Hopmann, & K.Riquartrs (Eds.). Teaching as a reflective practice. The German didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.