SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S.Abell & N.Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 11051149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Achieve. (2010). Taking the lead in science education: Forging next-generation science standards. Washington, DC: Achieve. Retrieved from http://achieve.org/files/InternationalScienceBenchmarkingReport.pdf.
  • Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 152.
  • Anderson, J. O., Chiu, M. H., & Yore, L. D. (2010). First cycle of PISA (2000–2006)—International perspectives on successes and challenges: Research and policy directions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 373388.
  • Apple, M. W. (1999). Power, meaning and identity. Essays in critical educational studies. New York: Peter Lang Publ.
  • Astiz, M. F., Wiseman, A., & Baker, D. (2002). Slouching toward decentralization: Consequences of globalization and other curricular control in national education systems. Comparative Education Review, 46, 6688.
  • Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzales, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. A. (1996). Science achievement in the Middle Schools Years. IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
  • Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Beeth, M., Duit, R., Prenzel, C., Ostermeier, R., Tytler, R., & Wickman, P. O. (2003). Quality development projects in science education. In D.Psillos, P.Kariotoglou, V.Tselfes, E.Hatzikraniotis, G.Fassoulopoulos, & M.Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge based society (pp. 447457). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2008). Education, globalisation and the knowledge economy. London, UK: TLRP—Institute of Education, University of London.
  • Bybee, R. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In W.Gräber & C.Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 3768). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
  • Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 561580.
  • Carter, L. (2008a). Globalization and science education: The implications of science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 617633.
  • Carter, L. (2008b). Science Education and contemporary times: Finding our way though the challenges. In B.Atweh, C.Keitel, A.Calabrese Barton, C.Vistro-Yu, M.Borba, R.Vithal, & N.Gough (Eds.) Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 7994). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Carter, L., & Dediwalage, R. (2010). Globalisation and science education: The case of Sustainability by the Bay. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 275291.
  • Charlton, B., & Andras, P. (2006). Globalization in science education: An inevitable and beneficial trend. Medical Hypotheses, 66, 869873.
  • Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R.Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota Studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 2743.
  • Chiu, M. H. (2011). Bridging the gaps between policy and practice on equity for science education reforms. In J. A.Bianchini V. L.Akerson A.Calabrese Barton O.Lee & A. J.Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Clothey, R., Mills, M., & Baumgarten, J. (2010). A closer look at the impact of globalization on science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 305313.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationships to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582601.
  • Dolin, J., & Krogh, L. B. (2010). The relevance and consequences of PISA science in a Danish context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 565592.
  • Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 6184.
  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science—From behaviourism towards social contructivism and beyond. In B. J.Fraser & K. G.Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, Part 1 (pp. 325). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Eisenhart, M. (2008). Globalization and science education in a community-based after-school program. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 7395.
  • Ernest, P. (2008). Epistemological issues in the internationalization and globalization of mathematics education. In B.Atweh, C.Keitel, A.Calabrese Barton, C.Vistro-Yu, M.Borba, R.Vithal, & N.Gough (Eds.) Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 3955). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Fensham, P. (2008). Context or culture: Can TIMSS and PISA teach us avout what determines educational achievement in science? In B.Atweh, C.Keitel, A.Calabrese Barton, C.Vistro-Yu, M.Borba, R.Vithal, & N.Gough (Eds.) Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 151172). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Freeman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  • Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 6198.
  • Gough, N. (2008). All around the world science education, constructivisms, and globalisation. In B.Atweh, C.Keitel, A.Calabrese Barton, C.Vistro-Yu, M.Borba, R.Vithal, & N.Gough (Eds.) Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 1938). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Guo, C. -J. (2007). Issues in science learning: An international perspective. In S.Abell & N.Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 227256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645670.
  • Hwang, S. W., & Roth, W. M. (2008). Learning science in an era of globalization: A phenomenology of the foreign/strange. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 937958.
  • Lin, J. -W., & Chiu, M. -H. (2007). Exploring the characteristics and diverse sources of students' mental models of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 771803.
  • Martin, S. N. (2010). “ Act locally, publish globally”: International/multi-disciplinary research efforts needed to understand the impact of globalization on science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 263273.
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the future. London, UK: King's College London.
  • OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills—A new framework for assessment. Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Assessing scientific reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris, France: OECD.
  • OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy—A framework for PISA (2009). Paris, France: OECD.
  • Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173184.
  • Ostermeier, C., Prenzel, M., & Duit, R. (2010). Improving science and mathematics instruction: The SINUS project as an example for reform as teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 303327.
  • PARSEL (2011). Retrieved from http://www.parsel.uni-kiel.de/cms/
  • Peters, M. (2002). Education, policy research and the global knowledge economy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(1), 91102.
  • Penn, H. (2005). Unequal childhoods: Young children's lives in poor countries. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Quigley, C. (2009). Globalization and science education: The implications for indigenous knowledge systems. International Education Studies, 2(1), 7688.
  • Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167182.
  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S.Abell & N.Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Roth, K., Druker, S., Garnier, H., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., Rasmussen, D., Trubacova, S., Warvi, D., Okamoto, Y., Gonzales, P., Stigler, J., & Gallimore, R. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 videostudy. Statistical analysis report. Washington, DC: NCES—National Centre for Educational Statistics.
  • Roth, W. -M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (Special Issue: Scientific Literacy and Contexts in PISA Science), 46(8), 909921.
  • Seidel, T., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2005). Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 539556.
  • Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS Education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teacher College Press.
  • Spring, J. (2008). Research on globalisation and education. Review of Educational Research, 78, 330363.
  • Tørnæs, U., (2001, December 4). Danske elever er for dårlige [Danish students are too bad] (press release). Copenhagen: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.uvm.dk.
  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535585.
  • Waddington, D., Nentwig, P., & Schanze, S. (2007). Making it comparable—Standards in science education. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Web of Science. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.isiwebofknowledge.com/.
  • Westbury, L., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Teaching as reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.