SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    John E. McEneaney, Simulation-Based Evaluation of Learning Sequences for Instructional Technologies, Instructional Science, 2016, 44, 1, 87

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Kai-Yu Tang, Chin-Chung Tsai, The Intellectual Structure of Research on Educational Technology in Science Education (ETiSE): A Co-citation Network Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals (2008–2013), Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2016,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Hans van der Meij, Jan van der Meij, Ruth Harmsen, Animated pedagogical agents effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment, Educational Technology Research and Development, 2015, 63, 3, 381

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Dermot F. Donnelly, Jonathan M. Vitale, Marcia C. Linn, Automated Guidance for Thermodynamics Essays: Critiquing Versus Revisiting, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 6, 861

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Satyugjit Virk, Douglas Clark, Pratim Sengupta, Digital Games as Multirepresentational Environments for Science Learning: Implications for Theory, Research, and Design, Educational Psychologist, 2015, 50, 4, 284

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Bahadir Namdar, Ji Shen, Modeling-Oriented Assessment in K-12 Science Education: A synthesis of research from 1980 to 2013 and new directions, International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37, 7, 993

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Cesar Delgado, Navigating Tensions Between Conceptual and Metaconceptual Goals in the Use of Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 132

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Lei Liu, Steven Gray, Rebecca Jordan, Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A tale of two classrooms, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 1
  9. 9
    Hsin-Kai Wu, Che-Yu Kuo, Tsung-Hau Jen, Ying-Shao Hsu, What makes an item more difficult? Effects of modality and type of visual information in a computer-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities, Computers & Education, 2015, 85, 35

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    George E. DeBoer, Edys S. Quellmalz, Jodi L. Davenport, Michael J. Timms, Cari F. Herrmann-Abell, Barbara C. Buckley, Kevin A. Jordan, Chun-Wei Huang, Jean C. Flanagan, Comparing three online testing modalities: Using static, active, and interactive online testing modalities to assess middle school students' understanding of fundamental ideas and use of inquiry skills related to ecosystems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 4
  11. 11
    Ileana M. Greca, Eugenia Seoane, Irene Arriassecq, Epistemological Issues Concerning Computer Simulations in Science and Their Implications for Science Education, Science & Education, 2014, 23, 4, 897

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Binbin Zheng, Mark Warschauer, Jin Kyoung Hwang, Penelope Collins, Laptop Use, Interactive Science Software, and Science Learning Among At-Risk Students, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 4, 591

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Lara K. Smetana, Randy L. Bell, Which Setting to Choose: Comparison of Whole-Class vs. Small-Group Computer Simulation Use, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 4, 481

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Meilan Zhang, Who are interested in online science simulations? Tracking a trend of digital divide in Internet use, Computers & Education, 2014, 76, 205

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Wolff-Michael Roth, Data Generation in the Discovery Sciences—Learning from the Practices in an Advanced Research Laboratory, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 4, 1617

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Xiufeng Liu, Difficulties of items related to energy and matter: Implications for learning progression in high school chemistry, Educación Química, 2013, 24, 4, 416

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Dermot Donnelly, John O’Reilly, Oliver McGarr, Enhancing the Student Experiment Experience: Visible Scientific Inquiry Through a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 4, 1571

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Achilleas Mandrikas, Ioannis Parkosidis, Ploutarchos Psomiadis, Artemisia Stoumpa, Anthimos Chalkidis, Evangelia Mavrikaki, Constantine Skordoulis, Improving Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Education via a Laboratory Course on Air Pollution: One University’s Experience, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 2, 113

    CrossRef

  19. You have free access to this content19
    Randy L. Bell, Jennifer L. Maeng, Ian C. Binns, Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 3
  20. 20
    Georgios Olympiou, Zacharia Zacharias, Ton deJong, Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation, Instructional Science, 2013, 41, 3, 575

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Jennifer L. Maeng, Bridget K. Mulvey, Lara K. Smetana, Randy L. Bell, Preservice Teachers’ TPACK: Using Technology to Support Inquiry Instruction, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 6, 838

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Che-Yu Kuo, Hsin-Kai Wu, Toward an integrated model for designing assessment systems: An analysis of the current status of computer-based assessments in science, Computers & Education, 2013, 68, 388

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Hannie Gijlers, Ton de Jong, Using Concept Maps to Facilitate Collaborative Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013, 22, 3, 340

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Edys S. Quellmalz, Michael J. Timms, Matt D. Silberglitt, Barbara C. Buckley, Science assessments for all: Integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 3
  25. 25
    Kathleen Scalise, Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration, Science Education, 2012, 96, 6
  26. 26
    Ton de Jong, Armin Weinberger, Isabelle Girault, Anders Kluge, Ard W. Lazonder, Margus Pedaste, Sten Ludvigsen, Muriel Ney, Barbara Wasson, Astrid Wichmann, Caspar Geraedts, Adam Giemza, Tasos Hovardas, Rachel Julien, Wouter R. van Joolingen, Anne Lejeune, Constantinos C. Manoli, Yuri Matteman, Tago Sarapuu, Alex Verkade, Vibeke Vold, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments, Educational Technology Research and Development, 2012, 60, 5, 883

    CrossRef