SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. You have free access to this content1
    Pryce R. Davis, Rosemary S. Russ, Dynamic framing in the communication of scientific research: Texts and interactions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 2
  2. 2
    Dermot Francis Donnelly, Oliver McGarr, John O'Reilly, ‘Just Be Quiet and Listen to Exactly What He's Saying': Conceptualising power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 12, 2029

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Niina Nurkka, Jouni Viiri, Karen Littleton, Sami Lehesvuori, A methodological approach to exploring the rhythm of classroom discourse in a cumulative frame in science teaching, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2014, 3, 1, 54

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Paula Cristina Cardoso Mendonça, Rosária Justi, An instrument for analyzing arguments produced in modeling-based chemistry lessons, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 2
  5. 5
    David Hammer, Leema K. Berland, Confusing Claims for Data: A Critique of Common Practices for Presenting Qualitative Research on Learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2014, 23, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Garry Hoban, Wendy Nielsen, Creating a narrated stop-motion animation to explain science: The affordances of “Slowmation” for generating discussion, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2014, 42, 68

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Amanda Crowell, Deanna Kuhn, Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study, Journal of Cognition and Development, 2014, 15, 2, 363

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Rola Khishfe, Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 6, 974

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Savreen Hundal, Daniel M. Levin, Alla Keselman, Lessons of Researcher–Teacher Co-design of an Environmental Health Afterschool Club Curriculum, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 9, 1510

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Andri Christodoulou, Jonathan Osborne, The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: A case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 10
  11. 11
    Anders Eklöf, A long and winding path: Requirements for critical thinking in project work, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2013, 2, 2, 61

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Nam-Hwa Kang, Eun Kyung Lee, Argument and Argumentation: A Review of Literature for Clarification of Translated Words, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2013, 33, 6, 1119

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Ushiri Kulatunga, Richard S. Moog, Jennifer E. Lewis, Argumentation and participation patterns in general chemistry peer-led sessions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 10
  14. 14
    Mehmet Aydeniz, Deniz Gürçay, Assessing quality of pre-service physics teachers’ written arguments, Research in Science & Technological Education, 2013, 31, 3, 269

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    DIANE SILVA PIMENTEL, KATHERINE L. McNEILL, Conducting Talk in Secondary Science Classrooms: Investigating Instructional Moves and Teachers’ Beliefs, Science Education, 2013, 97, 3
  16. 16
    Maria Evagorou, Jonathan Osborne, Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 2
  17. 17
    Santiago Sandi-Urena, Todd Gatlin, Factors Contributing to the Development of Graduate Teaching Assistant Self-Image, Journal of Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 10, 1303

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Rosemary S. Russ, Melissa J. Luna, Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 3
  19. 19
    Joi Phelps Walker, Victor Sampson, Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn: Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Chemistry Students Learn How to Construct Arguments and Engage in Argumentation During a Laboratory Course, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 5
  20. 20
    Sami Lehesvuori, Jouni Viiri, Helena Rasku-Puttonen, Josephine Moate, Jussi Helaakoski, Visualizing communication structures in science classrooms: Tracing cumulativity in teacher-led whole class discussions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 8
  21. 21
    Daniel T. Hickey, Gita Taasoobshirazi, Dionne Cross, Assessment as learning: Enhancing discourse, understanding, and achievement in innovative science curricula, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 10
  22. 22
    Leema K. Berland, Katherine L. McNeill, For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson, Science Education, 2012, 96, 5
  23. 23
    Rosemary S. Russ, Victor R. Lee, Bruce L. Sherin, Framing in cognitive clinical interviews about intuitive science knowledge: Dynamic student understandings of the discourse interaction, Science Education, 2012, 96, 4
  24. 24
    Leema K. Berland, Victor R. Lee, In Pursuit of Consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 12, 1857

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Ian Abrahams, Michael J. Reiss, Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 8