SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417476.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 10571095.
  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1989). The development of a multiple-choice instrument for monitoring views on science-technology-society topics. Ottawa: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
  • Aikenhead, G., Ryan, A., & Desautels, J. (1989, April). Monitoring student views on science technology-society issues: The development of multiple-choice items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
  • Akerson, V. L., Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of young children's ideas in science on teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295317.
  • Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. A. (2009). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Research in Science Education, 99999, 1.
  • Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: The results of a three-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653680.
  • Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching the nature of science explicitly in a first grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 377394.
  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 918942.
  • Allen, H., Jr. (1959). Attitudes of certain high school seniors toward science and scientific careers. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 3955.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project, 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Project 2061: Science all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 719747.
  • Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1971). School learning: An introduction educational psychology. London Holt: International Edition.
  • Barman, C. R. (1996). Students' views of scientist and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 35, 1823.
  • Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers' understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 414436.
  • Billeh, V. Y., & Hasan, O. E. (1975). Factors influencing teachers' gain in understanding the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 209219.
  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study [BSCS]. (1962). Processes of science test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Brandes, A. (1994). Elementary school children's images of science. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Rethinking learning and its contexts. Presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Boston, MA, June 1994. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Media Laboratory.
  • Capello, M. (2005). Photo interviews: Eliciting data through conversations with children. Field Methods, 17, 170182.
  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514529.
  • Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of scientists: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 56, 255265.
  • Chiappetta, E. L., Ganesh, T. G., Lee, Y. H., Philips, M. C. (2006, April). Examination of science textbook analysis research conducted on textbooks published over the past 100 years in the United States. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
  • Clark, C. D. (1999). The auto driven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children's experiences. Visual Sociology, 14, 3950.
  • Clark, K. B. (1955). Prejudice and your child. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Clough, M. P. (2007). Teaching the nature of science to secondary and post-secondary students: Questions rather than tenets. The Panteneto Forum, Issue 25, http://ww.panteneto.co.uk/issue25/front25.htm.
  • Cooley, W. W., & Klopfer, L. E. (1961). Manual for the test on understanding science. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.
  • Crumb, G. H. (1965). Understanding of science in high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 246250.
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Farland, D., & McComas, W. F. (2006). “Deconstructing the DASZ” development of a valid and reliable tool for assessing students' perceptions of scientists. Paper presented at Association of Science Teacher Educator Conference, Clearwater, FL.
  • Farland-Smith, D. (2009). How does culture shape students' perceptions of scientists? cross-national comparative study of American and Chinese elementary students. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21, 2342.
  • Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 335345.
  • Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 195205.
  • Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the burden of ‘acting white’. Urban Review, 18(3), 176206.
  • Fort, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How children see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent, Science and Children, 26, 813.
  • Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 6073.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62, 509515.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1980). Development and validation of a test of enquiry skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 716.
  • Gadamer, G.-H. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. D. E. Lingle (Trans and Ed.) Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Gadamer, G.-H. (1998). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum (Original work published 1960).
  • Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights From TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context (NCES 2009–001 Revised). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
  • Green, S., & Hogan, D. (2005). Researching children's experiences: Methods and approaches. London: Sage Publications.
  • Grinberg, J. (2003). Only the facts? In D. Weil & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Critical thinking and learning: An encyclopedia for parents and teachers. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Gyllenpalm, J., & Wickman, P.-O. (2010). “ Experiments” and the inquiry emphasis conflation in science teacher education. Science Education, 95, 908926.
  • Hillis, S. R. (1975). The development of an instrument to determine student views of the tentativeness of science. In Research and Curriculum Development in Science Education: Science Teacher Behavior and Student Affective and Cognitive Learning. (Vol. 3). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory. New York: Seabury.
  • Horn, R. (2000). Teacher talk: A post-formal inquiry into educational change. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Horstman, M., & Bradding, A. (2002). Helping children speak up in the health service. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 6, 7584.
  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 12771288.
  • Hungerford, H., & Walding, H. (1974). The modification of elementary methods students' concepts concerning science and scientists. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association.
  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science Education, 20, 591607.
  • Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180192.
  • Jungwirth, E. (1970). An evaluation of the attained development of the intellectual skills needed for understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry by BSCS pupils in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 141151.
  • Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders' views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 470496.
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551578.
  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2005). Improving students' understandings of nature of science: Explicit, reflective contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Dallas, TX.
  • Kimball, M.E. (1967–68). Understanding the nature of science: Acomparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110120.
  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Getting beyond the facts: Teaching social studies/social sciences in the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 76, 227266.
  • Korth, W. (1969). Test every senior project: Understanding the social aspects of science. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lederman, J. S., & Khishfe, R. (2002). Views of nature of science, Form D. Unpublished paper. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
  • Lederman, J. S. & Ko, E. K. (2004). Views of nature of science, Form E. Unpublished paper. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago IL.
  • Lederman, J. S & Lederman, N. G. (2004). Early elementary students' and teachers understandings of nature of science and scientific inquiry: Lessons learned from Project ICAN. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Vancouver, British Columbia.
  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp 831879). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom: Factors, that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916929.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331359.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497521.
  • Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of the tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225239.
  • Lederman, N. G., Wade, P., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing the Nature of Science: What is the Nature of Our Assessments? Science & Education 7, 595615.
  • Lee, O. (1999). Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Educational Research, 69, 83115.
  • Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “draw a scientist tests” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 773792.
  • Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2008). Young children's motivational beliefs about learning science. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 378394.
  • Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., & Hunt, A. (1989). Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6, 159166.
  • Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation on preservice primary teachers' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 11371164.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., Shepard, L. A., & O'Day, J. A. (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform: A report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-based Education Reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, National Academy of Education.
  • Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389407.
  • Moore, R., & Sutman, F. (1970). The development, field test and validation of an inventory of scientific attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 8594.
  • Mutegi, J. (2011). The inadequacies of “Science for All” and the necessity and nature of a socially transformative curriculum approach for African American science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 301316.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1995). Critical incidents in the science classroom and the nature of science. School Science Review, 76, 4146.
  • Ogbu, J. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ogunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective science teachers' understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 2532.
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas about- science” should be taught in school? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692720.
  • Parsons, E. C. (2008). Learning contexts, Black cultural ethos, and the science achievement of African, American students in an urban middle school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 665683.
  • Potter, J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258284.
  • Rosenthal, D. R. (1993). Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 212216.
  • Rubba, P. (1976). Nature of scientific knowledge scale. School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
  • Schibeci, R. A. (1986). Images of science and scientists and science education. Science Education, 70, 139149.
  • Schwirian, P. (1968). On measuring attitudes toward science. Science Education, 52, 172179.
  • Scientific Literacy Research Center. (1967). Wisconsin inventory of science processes. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
  • Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 349422.
  • Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 11011103.
  • Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493509.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797811.
  • Steinberg, S. (2007). Race relations: A critique. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Stice, G. (1958). Facts about science test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Suchting, W. A. (1995). The nature of scientific thought. Science & Education, 4, 122.
  • Swan, M. D. (1966). Science achievement as it relates to science curricula and programs at the sixth grade level in Montana public schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 102123.
  • Tamir, P. (1972). Understanding the process of science by students exposed to different science curricula in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9, 239245.
  • Trent, J. (1965). The attainment of the concept “understanding science” using contrasting physics courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 10311055.
  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. The Condition of Education. (2001). NCES 2001-072. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Walls, L., Bryan, L. A. (2009, April). Awakening a dialog: Examining race in NOS research from 1967 to 2008. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
  • Welch, W. W., & Walberg, H. J. (1972). A national experiment in curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 373383.
  • West, C. (1993). Race matters. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Wilson, L. (1954). A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society. Science Education, 38, 159164.