SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and responding to students' questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174193.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ares, N. (2010). Political and cultural dimensions of organizing learning around funds of knowledge. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 109(1), 192206.
  • Ballenger, C. (2009). Puzzling moments, teachable moments: Practicing teacher research in urban classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 10081026.
  • Bang, M., Medin, D., & Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(35), 1386813874.
  • Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge, discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 5073.
  • Bessell, A. G., Burke, M. C., Plaza, M. P., Lee, O., & Schumm, J. S. (2010). The educational reform rating rubric: Example of a new tool for evaluating complex school reform initiatives. Field Methods, 20(3), 283295.
  • Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997). Contextual design: A customer-centered approach to systems designs. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149164.
  • Borman, G. D., Gamoran, A., & Bowdon, J. (2008). A randomized trial of teacher development in elementary science: First-year achievement effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(3), 237264.
  • Bryk, A.S. (2009). Support a science of performance improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(8), 597600.
  • Bryk, A. S., & Gomez, L. M. (2008). Reinventing a research and development capacity. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), The future of educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform (pp. 181187). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
  • Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlitz, B., & Willett, J. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogicaTM: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 2341.
  • Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls' access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392414.
  • Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459485.
  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883908.
  • Cobb, P. A., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 913.
  • Cochrane Collaboration. (2005). Continuing education meetings and workshops: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane review). Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 21(3), 187188.
  • Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Confrey, J., Castro-Filho, J., & Wilhelm, J. (2000). Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 179191.
  • Cooper, C. R., Denner, J., & Lopez, E. M. (1999). Cultural brokers: Helping Latino children on pathways toward success. The Future of Children, 9, 5157.
  • Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. CPRE Research Report # RR-63. New York, NY: Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement, Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • Cordray, D. S., & Pion, G. M. (2006). Treatment strength and integrity: Models and methods. In R. R. Bootzin & P. E. McKnight (Eds.), Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation (pp. 103124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81112.
  • Donovan, S., Wigdor, A. K., & Snow, C. E. (2003). Strategic education research partnership. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153187.
  • Dynarski, M. (2008). Bringing answers to educators: Guiding principles for research syntheses. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 2729.
  • Fishman, B. J., & Krajcik, J. (2003). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? A commentary. Science Education, 87(4), 564573.
  • Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643658.
  • Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151175.
  • Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915945.
  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 1032). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.
  • Gee, J. P., & Clinton, K. (2000). An African American child's 'science talk': Co-construction of meaning from the perspective of multiple Discourses. In M. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 118135). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B. J., & Soloway, E. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922939.
  • Gerard, L., Bowyer, J., & Marx, R. (2008). A community of principals: Building school leadership for scaling technology-science curriculum reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  • Gorden, V. S., & Bieman, J. M. (1995). Rapid prototyping: Lessons learned. IEEE Software, 12(1), 8595.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejada, C. (2000). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286303.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Orellana, M. (2006). The problem of English learners: Constructing genres of difference. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 502507.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 1925.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100117.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
  • Halverson, R., Feinstein, N., & Meshoulam, D. (2011). School leadership for science education. In G. E. DeBoer (Ed.), The role of public policy in K-12 science education (pp. 397430). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 9781003.
  • Herrenkohl, L. R., & Mertl, V. (2010). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 1630.
  • Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225259.
  • Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers' workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181217.
  • Hsi, S., Sabelli, N., Krajcik, J., Tinker, R. F., & Ellenbogen, K. (2006). Learning at the nanoscale: Research questions that the rapidly evolving interdisciplinarity of science poses for the learning sciences. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 10661072). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Hatian Creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 7393.
  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Education Research Journal, 38(3), 499534.
  • Jacob, B. (2007). The challenge of staffing urban schools with urban teachers. The Future of Children, 17(1), 129153.
  • Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 113128.
  • Kelly, J. A., Somlai, A. M., DiFranceisco, W. J., Otto-Salaj, L. L., McAuliffe, T. L., Hackl, K. L., & Rompa, D. (2000). Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: Transferring effective research-based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. American Journal of Public Health, 90(7), 10821099.
  • Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522549.
  • Knapp, M. S., & Plecki, M. L. (2001). Investing in the renewal of urban science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 10891100.
  • Krajcik, J. S., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 132.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lee, O. (2002). Science inquiry for elementary students from diverse backgrounds. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 2369). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2005). Dilemmas in scaling up innovations in elementary science instruction with nonmainstream students. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 411438.
  • Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 3152.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
  • Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 221227.
  • Lieberman, A., & Wood, D. (2002). Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Lin, H.-T., & Fishman, B. J. (2004). Supporting the scaling of innovations: Guiding teacher adaptation of materials by making implicit structures explicit. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon, & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 617). Santa Monica, CA: Erlbaum.
  • Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Toward teachers' adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 245255.
  • Lynch, S. J., Szesze, M., Pyke, C., & Kuipers, J. (2007). Scaling up highly-rated science curriculum units for diverse student populations: Features that affect collaborative research and vice versa. In B. Schneider & S-.K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Issues in practice (Vol. II, pp. 91122). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R., Myers, N., Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2009). School and teacher predictors of science instruction practices with English language learners in urban elementary schools. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(2), 93118.
  • Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B. J., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Revital, T. T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 10631080.
  • Maull, K. E., Saldivar, M. G., Sumner, T. (2011 June). Understanding digital library adoption: A use diffusion approach. Paper presented at the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Ottawa, Canada.
  • McDonald, S.-K., Keesler, V. A., Kauffmann, N. J., & Schneider, B. (2006). Scaling up exemplary interventions. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 1524.
  • McMunn, N., McColskey, W., & Butler, S. (2004). Building teacher capacity in classroom assessment to improve student learning. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, & Practice, 4(4), 2548.
  • Means, B., Confrey, J., House, A., & Bhanot, R. (2008). STEM high schools: Specialized science, technology, engineering, and mathematics secondary schools in the United States. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
  • Millen, D. R. (2000). Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 280286). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2001). Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2010). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Washington, DC: Committee on Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, National Research Council.
  • National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297321.
  • O'Connor, K., & Allen, A-R. (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for Studies in Education, 109(1): 160175.
  • O'Connor, K., & Penuel, W. R. (2010). Introduction: Principles of a human sciences approach to research on learning. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor, (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for Studies in Education, 109(1): 116.
  • O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic talk and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318355.
  • O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (2011). Problematizing dialogic and authoritative discourse, their coding in classroom transcripts, and realization in the classroom. Paper presented at the ISCAR Congress, Rome, Italy.
  • O'Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 3384.
  • Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America's future. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
  • Pea, R. D., & Collins, A. (2008). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (Vol. 3–12). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Penuel, W. R., DeBarger, A. H. (2011). Supporting teacher learning to improve classroom assessment in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2009). Comparing three approaches to preparing teachers to teach for deep understanding in Earth science: Short-term impacts on teachers and teaching practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(4), 461508.
  • Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., & Moorthy, S. (2011). Preparing teachers to design sequences of instruction in Earth science: A comparison of three professional development programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 9961025.
  • Penuel, W. R., McWilliams, H., McAuliffe, C., Benbow, A., Mably, C., & Hayden, M. M. (2009). Teaching for understanding in Earth science: Comparing impacts on planning and instruction in three professional development designs for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 415436.
  • Reich, R. B. (2011). Aftershock: The next economy and America's future. New York: Vintage.
  • Rethinam, V., Pyke, C., & Lynch, S. (2008). Using multi-level analyses to study the effectiveness of science curriculum. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21(1), 1842.
  • Rosebery, A. (2005). “ What are we going to do next?” A case study of lesson planning. In R. Nemirovsky, A. Rosebery, B. Warren, & J. Solomon (Eds.), Everyday matters in mathematics and science: Studies of complex classroom events (pp. 299328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rosebery, A., McIntyre, E., & Gonzales, N. (2001). Connecting students' cultures to instruction. In E. McIntyre, A. Rosebery, & N. Gonzales (Eds.), Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students' lives (pp. 113). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Rosebery, A., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “ The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322357.
  • Rosebery, A., & Warren, B. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching science to English language learners. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
  • Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117148.
  • Rowan, B. (2002). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3–4), 283314.
  • Scafidi, B., Sjoquist, D. L., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2007). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26(2), 145159.
  • Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221245.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Shear, L., & Penuel, W. R. (2010). Rock-solid support: Florida district weighs effectiveness of science professional learning. Journal of Staff Development, 31(5), 4851.
  • Sloane, F.C. (2008). Through the looking glass: Experiments, quasi-experiments, and the medical model. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 4146.
  • Smith, T. M., Desimone, L. M., Zeidner, T. L., Dunn, A. C., Bhatt, M., & Rumyantseva, N. L. (2007). Inquiry-oriented instruction in science: Who teaches that way? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(3), 169199.
  • Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 610631.
  • Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128150.
  • Spillane, J. P., & Callahan, K. E. (2002). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 201225.
  • Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918940.
  • Stern, L., & Ahlgren, A. (2002). Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 889910.
  • Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355368.
  • Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Jr., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., … Rimoin, D. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(10), 12781287.
  • Supovitz, J. A. (2008). Implementation as iterative refraction. In J. A. Supovitz & E. H. Weinbaum (Eds.), The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 963980.
  • Supovitz, J. A., & Zief, S. G. (2000). Why they stay away: Survey reveals invisible barriers to teacher participation. Journal of Staff Development, 21(4), 2428.
  • Tabak, I. (2006). Prospects for change at the nexus of policy and design. Educational Resercher, 35(2), 2430.
  • Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 11431144.
  • Tai, R. H., & Maltese, A. V. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669685.
  • Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., Braaten, M. (2010). Developing a theory of teacher practice. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Tzou, C. T., Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2007). Micros & Me: A fifth-grade science exploration into personally and culturally consequential microbiology. Seattle, WA: Everyday Science and Technology Group, University of Washington.
  • Vanosdall, R., Klentschy, M. P., Hedges, L. V., Weisbaum, K. S. (2007). A randomized study of the effects of scaffolded guided-inquiry instruction on student achievement in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529552.
  • Watson, M. C., Bond, C. M., Grimshaw, J. M., Mollison, J., Ludbrook, A., & Walker, A. E. (2002). Educational strategies to promote evidence-based community pharmacy practice: A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). Family Practice, 19(5), 529536.
  • Weinbaum, E. H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2010). Planning ahead: Make program implementation more predictable. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 6871.
  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Willinsky, J. (2001). The strategic education research program and the public value of research. Educational Researcher, 30(1), 514.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model-based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 310378.
  • Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(2), 211213.