Cited in:


This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    George M. Harrison, Kanesa Duncan Seraphin, Joanna Philippoff, Lisa M. Vallin, Paul R. Brandon, Comparing Models of Nature of Science Dimensionality Based on the Next Generation Science Standards, International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37, 8, 1321


  2. You have free access to this content2
    Pryce R. Davis, Rosemary S. Russ, Dynamic framing in the communication of scientific research: Texts and interactions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 2
  3. 3
    Eva Thomm, Johannes Hentschke, Rainer Bromme, The Explaining Conflicting Scientific Claims (ECSC) Questionnaire: Measuring Laypersons’ explanations for conflicts in science, Learning and Individual Differences, 2015, 37, 139


  4. 4
    SUFEN CHEN, WEN-HUA CHANG, CHIH-HUNG LAI, CHENG-YUE TSAI, A Comparison of Students’ Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation-Based and Microcomputer-Based Laboratories, Science Education, 2014, 98, 5