SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aronowitz, S. (1992). The politics of identity: Class, culture, social movements. New York: Routledge.
  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual identity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Bettie, J. (1995). Class dismissed? Roseanne and the changing face of working-class iconography. Social Text 45, 14(4), 125149.
  • Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Billson, J. M., & Terry, M. B. (1982). In search of the silken purse: Factors in attrition among first-generation students. College and University, 58(1), 5775.
  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441458.
  • Brandt, C. (2008). Scientific discourse in the academy: A case study of an American Indian Undergraduate. Science Education, 92, 825847.
  • Burrowes, P., & Nazario, G. (2008). Promoting student learning through the integration of lab and lecture. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(4), 1823.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O'Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 3775.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871889.
  • Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459485.
  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 11871218.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Choy, S. P. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (No. 2001-126). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Collins, P. H. (1999). Moving beyond gender: Intersectionality and scientific knowledge. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 261284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (ed). New York: Routledge.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
  • Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970977.
  • Dahlberg, K. (2006). The essence of essences—The search for meaning structures in phenomenological analysis of lifeworld phenomena. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1, 1119.
  • Davis, J. (2010). The first-generation student experience: Implications for campus practice, and strategies for improving persistence and success. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does Technology-Enabled Active Learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243279.
  • Ecklund, E. H., Lincoln, A. E., & Tansey, C. (2012). Gender segregation in elite academic science. Gender & Society, 26(5), 693717.
  • Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Erwin, L., & Maurutto, P. (1998). Beyond access: Considering gender deficits in science education. Gender and Education, 10(1), 5169.
  • Fox, M. F., Sonnert, G., & Nikiforova, I. (2011). Programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Issues, problems, and solutions. Gender & Society, 25(5), 589615.
  • Freeman, M. (2007). Performing the event of understanding in hermeneutic conversations with narrative texts. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(7), 925944.
  • Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Harding, S. (Ed.). (1993). The “racial economy” of science: Toward a democratic future. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, post-colonialities, and modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Hartmann, D., Gerteis, J., & Croll, P. R. (2009). An empirical assessment of White theory: Hidden from how many? Social Problems, 56(3), 403424.
  • Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
  • Holland, D., & Leander, K. (2004). Ethnographic studies of positioning and subjectivity: An introduction. Ethos, 32(2), 127139.
  • Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “ We do science here”: Underrepresented students' interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553579.
  • Hurtado, S., Han, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Espinosa, L. L., Cabrera, N. L., & Cema, O. S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Biomedical and behavioral science aspirants' and minority students' first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 841887.
  • Johnson, A. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805821.
  • Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339366.
  • Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 7385.
  • Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in Black families and White families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747776.
  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levinson, B. A., & Holland, D. (1996). The cultural production of the educated person: An introduction. In B. A. Levinson, D. E. Foley, & D. C. Holland (Eds.), The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practices (pp. 154). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Lohfink, M. M., & Paulsen, M. B. (2005). Comparing the determinants of persistence for first-generation and continuing-generation students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(4), 409428.
  • London, H. B. (1992). Transformations: Cultural challenges faced by first-generation students. New Directions for Community Colleges, 80, 512.
  • Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
  • Lorber, J. (2011). Strategies of feminist research in a globalized world. In E. N. Chow, M. T. Segal, & L. Tan (Eds.), Analyzing gender, intersectionality, and multiple inequalities: Global, transnational, and local contexts (p. 3549). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • National Science Board. (2003). The science and engineering workforce: Realizing America's potential (NSB 03-69). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from National Science Foundation website: https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2003/nsb0369/
  • National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2011). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2011 (NSF 11-309). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from National Science Foundation website: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
  • Nuñez, A., & Cuccaro-Alamin, S. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education (No. 98-082). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593617.
  • Orbe, M. P. (2004). Negotiating multiple identities within multiple frames: An analysis of first-generation college students. Communication Education, 53(2), 131149.
  • Packard, B. W., & Babineau, M. E. (2009). From drafter to engineer, doctor to nurse: An examination of career compromise as renegotiated by working-class adults over time. Journal of Career Development, 35, 207227.
  • Packard, B. W., Gagnon, J. L., LaBelle, O., Jeffers, K., & Lynn, E. (2011). Women's experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(2), 129147.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Perry, P. (2001). White means never having to say you're ethnic: White youth and the construction of “cultureless” identities. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30(1), 5691.
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In R. Wisniewski & J. A. Hatch (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 523). Washington, D.C.: Falmer.
  • Rhoton, L. A. (2012). Distancing as a gendered barrier: Understanding women scientists' gender practices. Gender & Society, 25(6), 696716.
  • Richardson Bruna, K., & Vann, R. (2007). On pigs and packers: Radically contextualizing a practice of science with Mexican immigrant students. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(1), 1959.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative, Volume I (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another (K. Blamey, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society, 18(4), 429450.
  • Schmidt, P. (2010). In push for diversity, colleges pay attention to socioeconomic class. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(5), B5B7.
  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79(4), 437473.
  • Weis, L. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York: Routledge.
  • Weis, L. (1992). Discordant voices in the urban community college. New Directions for Community Colleges, 80, 1328.
  • Weis, L. (1995). Qualitative research in sociology of education: Reflections on the 1970s and beyond. In W. T. Pink & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Continuity and contradiction: The futures of the sociology of education (pp. 157173). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
  • Weis, L. (2004). Class reunion: The remaking of the American white working class. New York: Routledge.
  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.