SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Dermot F. Donnelly, Jonathan M. Vitale, Marcia C. Linn, Automated Guidance for Thermodynamics Essays: Critiquing Versus Revisiting, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Astrid Wichmann, Sebastian Timpe, Can Dynamic Visualizations with Variable Control Enhance the Acquisition of Intuitive Knowledge?, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Cesar Delgado, Navigating Tensions Between Conceptual and Metaconceptual Goals in the Use of Models, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 2-3, 132

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Jesper Haglund, Fredrik Jeppsson, Konrad J. Schönborn, Taking on the Heat—a Narrative Account of How Infrared Cameras Invite Instant Inquiry, Research in Science Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    John L. Nietfeld, Roger H. Bruning, Daniell DiFrancesca, The role of observation in the recall of informational text, International Journal of Educational Research, 2015, 69, 88

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Meng-Fei Cheng, David E. Brown, The role of scientific modeling criteria in advancing students' explanatory ideas of magnetism, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2015, 52, 6
  7. 7
    A. Lynn Stephens, John J. Clement, Use of physics simulations in whole class and small group settings: Comparative case studies, Computers & Education, 2015, 86, 137

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    George E. DeBoer, Edys S. Quellmalz, Jodi L. Davenport, Michael J. Timms, Cari F. Herrmann-Abell, Barbara C. Buckley, Kevin A. Jordan, Chun-Wei Huang, Jean C. Flanagan, Comparing three online testing modalities: Using static, active, and interactive online testing modalities to assess middle school students' understanding of fundamental ideas and use of inquiry skills related to ecosystems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 4
  9. You have free access to this content9
    Laura R. Novick, Emily G. Schreiber, Kefyn M. Catley, Deconstructing evolution education: The relationship between micro- and macroevolution, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 6
  10. 10
    Kihyun Ryoo, Marcia C. Linn, Designing guidance for interpreting dynamic visualizations: Generating versus reading explanations, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 2
  11. 11
    Pai-Hsing Wu, Hsin-Kai Wu, Ying-Shao Hsu, Establishing the Criterion-related, Construct, and Content Validities of a Simulation-based Assessment of Inquiry Abilities, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 10, 1630

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Julia M. Chamberlain, Kelly Lancaster, Robert Parson, Katherine K. Perkins, How guidance affects student engagement with an interactive simulation, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014, 15, 4, 628

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    O. Roger Anderson, Bradley C. Love, Meng-Jung Tsai, Neuroscience Perspectives for Science and Mathematics Learning in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 3, 467

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Chris Quintana, Joseph Krajcik, Using Drawing Technology to Assess Students’ Visualizations of Chemical Reaction Processes, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2014, 23, 3, 355

    CrossRef