SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Academic Planning and Development. (2011). Golden state student pulse survey (pp. 117). California: Golden State University.
  • Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A., & Chauncy, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 210223.
  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology, 40, 199209.
  • Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523535.
  • Barr, D., Gonzalez, M. E., & Wanat, S. F. (2008). The leaky pipeline: Factors associated with early decline in interest in premedical studies among underrepresented minority undergraduate students. Academic Medicine, 83, 503511.
  • Bembenutty, H. (2011). New directions for self-regulation of learning in postsecondary education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 117124.
  • Bhattacharyya, G., & Bodner, G. M. (2005). “ It gets me to the product”: How students propose organic mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 6.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Cartrette, D. P., & Bodner, G. M. (2010). Non-mathematical problem solving in organic chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 643660.
  • Chiu, M. H. (2007). A national survey of students' conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 421452.
  • Coppola, B. P. (1995). Progress in practice: Using concepts from motivational and self-regulated learning research to improve chemistry instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995(63), 8796.
  • Crouch, C., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970977.
  • D'Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grove, N. P., Hershberger, J. W., & Bretz, S. L. (2008). Impact of a spiral organic curriculum on student attrition and learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 157162.
  • Groves, F. H. (1995). Science vocabulary load of selected secondary science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 231235.
  • Hoekstra, A. (2008). Vibrant student voices: Exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 329341.
  • Hofer, B. K. (2004). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 129163.
  • Hurtado, S., Eagan, K., & Chang, M. (2010). Degrees of success: Bachelor's degree completion rates among initial STEM majors (p. 4). Los Angeles, California: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Retrieved from http://www.heri.ucla.edu/nih/HERIResearchBriefOL
  • Karoly, P., Boekaerts, M., & Maes, S. (2005). Toward consensus in the psychology of self-regulation: How far have we come? How far do we have yet to travel? Applied Psychology, 54(2), 300311.
  • MacArthur, J. R., & Jones, L. L. (2008). A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 187195.
  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  • McInerney, D. M. (2011). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts: Assessing the relationship of cultural group to self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 442464). New York: Routledge.
  • Morrissey, S. (2005). Lowering barriers to science education. Chemical and Engineering News, 83, 30.
  • Nandagopal, K., & Ericsson, K. A. (2012). An expert performance approach to the study of individual differences in self-regulated learning activities in upper-level college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 597609.
  • National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Science. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12984
  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Projections of education statistics to 2020. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/projections2020/sec5c.asp
  • Nelson, D. J. (2007). A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research university (pp. 153). Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma. Retrieved from internal-pdf: //NELSON_07Report-2635620608/NELSON_07Report.pdf
  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Retrieved from internal-pdf: //Novak(06)-TheoryunderlyingCMaps&howtousethem-2753059840/Novak(06)-TheoryunderlyingCMaps&howtousethem.pdf
  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paulson, D. R. (1999). Active learning and cooperative learning in the organic chemistry lecture class. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 11361140.
  • Penn, J. H., Nedeff, V. M., & Gozdzik, G. (2000). Organic chemistry and the Internet: A web-based approach to homework and testing using the WE-LEARN system. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 227231.
  • Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96116.
  • Pressley, M. (1995). More about the development of self-regulation: Complex, long-term, and thoroughly social. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 207212.
  • Purdie, N., & Hattie, J. (1996). Cultural differences in the use of strategies for self-regulated learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 845871.
  • Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915.
  • Rochin, R., & Mello, S. (2007). Latinos in science trends and opportunities. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6, 305355.
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569600.
  • Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M., & Stevens, R. (2012). Effect of cooperative problem-based lab instruction on metacognition and problem-solving skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(6), 700706.
  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111139.
  • Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 8594.
  • Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Wiley, E. W. (2005). Windows into the mind. Higher Education, 49, 413430.
  • Skahill, M. P. (2003). The role of social support network in college persistence among freshman students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(1), 3952.
  • Tien, L. T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J. A. (2002). Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 606632.
  • Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23, 362372.
  • Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. (2011). Self-regulation and learning strategies. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 4553.
  • Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 166184.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614628.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 5159.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement—Theoretical perspectives. 2nd Edition. Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.