SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., (1998) The influence of history of science courses on students' conceptions of the nature of science. Unpublished dissertation. Oregon State University.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiryin science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397419.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 10571095.
  • Achieve, Inc., on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS (2013). Next generation science standards. Retrieved June 25, 2013 from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295317.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Barufaldi, J. P., Bethel, L. J., & Lamb, W. G. (1977). The effect of a science methods course on the philosophical view of science among elementary education majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(4), 289294.
  • Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In: Minstrell J. & van Zee E. (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of. Science.
  • Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers' thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 10161031.
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Dunbar, K. (2001). What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition. In: Crowley, K. Shunn, C. & Okada T. (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday classroom and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc.
  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268291.
  • Flick L. & Lederman N. (Eds.), (2004). Scientific inquiry and nature of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Gould, S. J., & Eldridge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and model of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3, 115151.
  • Haukoos, G. D., & Penick, J. E. (1985). The effects of classroom climate on college science students: A replication study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 163168.
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry oriented instruction on sixth graders views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551578.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
  • Lederman, J. S. (2009). Teaching scientific inquiry: Exploration, directed, guided, and opened-ended levels. In National geographic science: Best practices and research base (pp. 820). Hapton-Brown Publishers.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331359.
  • Lederman, N. G. (2006). Research on nature of science: Reflections on the past, anticipations of the future. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7, (1). Retrieved July 13, 2012, from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v7 issue1/foreword/index.htm
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497521.
  • Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2012). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3.
  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S., (2004) Project ICAN: A professional development project to promote teachers' and students' knowledge of nature of science and scientific enquiry. In Proceedings of the 11th annual SAARMSTE conference. Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Liang, L. L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J., (2006). Student understanding of science and scientific inquiry: revision and further validation of an assessment instrument. In Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). San Francisco, CA.
  • Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. (2013). Changing preservice teachers' views of NOS: Why some conceptions are more easily altered than others (unpublished document). Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.
  • Metz, K. E. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219290.
  • National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Guiding principles for scientific inquiry. In: Shavelson R. J. & Towne L. (Eds.), Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692720.
  • Riley, J. P. II, (1979). The influence of hands-on science process training on preservice teachers' acquisition of process skills and attitude toward science and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 373384.
  • Sadler, T., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235256.
  • Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634656.
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 2355.
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345372.
  • Scharmann, L. C., & Harris, W. M. Jr., (1992). Teaching evolution: Understanding and applying the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 375388.
  • Schwartz, R. S. (2004). Epistemological views in authentic science practices: A cross-discipline comparison of scientists' views of nature of science and scientific inquiry (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
  • Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What scientists say: Scientists' views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727771.
  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and science inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610645.
  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J. S., Matthews, L., & Liu, S., (2002) Explicit/reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: Impact on student learning. In Paper presented at the 2002 annual international conference of the association for the education of teachers in science. Charlotte, NC.
  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., & Lederman, J., (2008, March). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. In Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Baltimore, MD.
  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Thompson, R., (2001, March). Grade nine students' views of nature of science and scientific inquiry: The effects of an inquiry-enthusiast's approach to teaching science as inquiry. In Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). St. Louis, MO.
  • Spears, J., & Zollman, D. (1977). The influence of structured versus unstructured laboratory on students' understanding the process of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 3338.
  • Tao, P. K. (2002). A study of students' focal awareness when studying science stories designed for fostering understanding of the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 32(1), 97120.
  • Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse's mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109130.
  • Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2010). More from the horse's mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 14311463.