SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R. A., Hofstein, A., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok, R., … Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397419.
  • Achieve, Inc. (2013). The next generation science standards (NGSS). Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association of University Women. (1994). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: Executive summary: A nationwide poll that assesses self-esteem, educational experiences, interest in math and science, and career aspirations of girls and boys ages 9–15 (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807830). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Arzi, H. J. (2012). Change—A desired permanent state in science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 883898). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Barstow, D. (1996). The richness of two cultures. National Conference on Student & Scientist Partnerships: Conference Report. Cambridge, MA: TERC. Retrieved from. http://www.terc.edu/ssp/conf_rep/ncssp_2/richtwo.htm
  • Bell, R., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? The impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487509.
  • Blank, R. K., Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. (2001). New tools for analyzing teaching, curriculum and standards in mathematics & science: Results from survey of enacted curriculum project. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
  • Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Brown, A. (1993). Leading technological change. Leadership & Organisational Development Journal, 14(4), 2130.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242.
  • Carr, K. (2002). Building bridges and crossing borders: Using service learning to overcome cultural barriers to collaboration between science and education departments. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 285298.
  • Caton, E., Brewer, C., & Brown, F. (2000). Building teacher-scientist partnerships: Teaching about energy through inquiry. School Science and Mathematics, 100(1), 715.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic reasoning in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175218.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Comeaux, P., & Huber, R. (2001). Students as scientists: Using interactive technologies and collaborative inquiry in an environmental science project for teachers and their students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(4), 235252.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the U.S. and Abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
  • Dewey, J. (1943). The school and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dolen, E., & Tanner, K. (2005). Moving from outreach to partnership: Striving for articulation and reform across the K-20+ science education continuum. Cell Biology Education, 4(1), 3537.
  • Donahue, T. P., Lewis, L. B., Price L. F., & Schmidt, D. A. (1998). Bringing science to life through community-based watershed education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(1), 1523.
  • Doubler, S. J. (1996). Two-way partnerships: An introduction to SSPs. National Conference on Student & Scientist Partnerships. Retrieved from http://www.terc.edu/ssp/conf_rep/ncssp_1/twoway.htm
  • Evans, C. A., Abrams, E. D., Rock, B. N., & Spencer, S. L. (2001). Student/scientist partnerships: A teachers' guide to evaluating the critical components. American Biology Teacher, 63(5), 318323.
  • Finarelli, M. G. (1998). GLOBE: A worldwide environmental science and education partnership. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(1), 7784.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1981). TOSRA—Test of science related attitudes. Hawthorne, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Fraser, B. J., & Butts, W. L. (1982). Relationship between levels of perceived classroom individualization and science-related attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(2), 143154.
  • Fouke, B. W., Farmer, J. D., Des Marias, D. J., Pratt, L., Sturchio, N. C., Burns, P. C., & Discipulo, M. K. (2000). Depositional facies and aqueous solid geochemistry of travertine depositing hot springs (Angel Terrace, Mammoth Hot Springs, Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A.). Journal of Sedimentary Research, 7(3), 565585.
  • Gilmer, P. J. (1997, March). Teachers learning science by doing science. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381391.
  • Hansson, E., & Yarden, A. (2012). Separating the research question from the laboratory techniques: Advancing High School Biology teachers' ability to ask research questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 12961320.
  • Harnik, P. G., & Ross, R. M. (2003a). Developing effective K-16 geoscience research partnerships. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 58.
  • Harnik, P. G. & Ross, R. M. (Eds.). (2003b). Assessing data accuracy when involving students in authentic paleontological research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 7684.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 10671104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (2003). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lawless, J. G., & Rock, B. N. (1998). Student scientist partnerships and data quality. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(1), 513.
  • Ledley, T. S., Haddad, N., Lockwood, J., & Brooks, D. (2003). Developing meaningful student-teacher-scientist partnerships. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 9195.
  • Ledley, T. S., Haddad, N., Lockwood, J., & Brooks, D. (2004 , January). Involving students in authentic research through student–teacher–scientist partnerships. Paper presented at the 84th AMS Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
  • Lee, H., & Songer, N. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923948.
  • Libarkin, J. C., & Anderson, S. W. (2005). Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results from the Geoscience Concept Inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 394401.
  • Libarkin, J. C., & Anderson, S. W. (2006). The geoscience concept inventory: Application of Rasch analysis to concept inventory development in higher education. In X. Liu & W. Boone (Eds.), Applications of Rasch measurement in science education (pp. 4573). Elmsford, NY: JAM Publishers.
  • Libarkin, J. C., & Anderson, S. W. (2008). Development of the geoscience concept inventory. In D. Deeds & B. Callen (Eds.), Proceedings of the National STEM Assessment Conference (pp. 148158). Springfield, MO: Drury University.
  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341358.
  • McKay, M., & McGrath, B. (2006). Real-world problem-solving using real-time data. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 3641.
  • Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Moreno, N. (2005). Science education partnerships: Being realistic about meeting expectations. Cell Biology Education, 4(1), 3032.
  • Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Kull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students' perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science, Education, and Technology, 7(2), 140161.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National Science Education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
  • NRC. (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • NRC. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • NRC. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • NRC. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Newbill, P. L. (2005). Instructional strategies to improve women's attitudes toward science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (pp. 184256). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Ross, R. M., Harnik, P. G., Allmon, W. D., Sherpa, J. M., Goldman, A. M., Nester, P. L., & Chiment, J. J. (2003). The mastodon matrix project: An experiment with large-scale public collaboration in paleontological research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 3947.
  • Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235256.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum and liberal education (pp. 229272). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 414.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 122.
  • Shulman, L. (1992). Ways of seeing, ways of knowing, ways of teaching, ways of learning about teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 393396.
  • Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students' understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50, 189208.
  • Tanner, K. D., Chatman, L., & Allen, D. (2003). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: Science teaching and learning across the school-university divide—Cultivating conversations through scientist-teacher partnerships. Cell Biology Education, 2, 195201.
  • Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Retrieved from www.work-learning.com
  • Tinker, R. F. (1997). Student scientist partnerships: Shrewd maneuvers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 111117.
  • Tomanak, D. (2005). Building successful partnerships between K-12 and universities. Cell Biology Education, 4(1), 2829.
  • Wilson, S. M. (2013. , April 19). Grand challenges in science education: Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340, 310313.
  • Wormstead, S. J., Becker, M. L., & Congalton, R. G. (2002). Tools for successful student–teacher–scientist partnerships. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 277284.
  • Wurstner, S., Herr, C., Andrews, G., & Alley, K. (2005). Teacher/Scientist partnership develops a simulated natural disaster scenario to enhance student learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(5), 522530.
  • Yellowstone National Park (YAI), & Yellowstone National Park (YNP). (2004). Expedition: Yellowstone! A curriculum-based residential program for grades 4–8 in Yellowstone National Park. (Available from the Formal Education Branch Division of Interpretation, P.O. Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190).