SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Association of Museums. (1992). Excellence and equity: Education and the public dimension of museums, a Report from the American Association of Museums. Washington, DC: AAM Press.
  • Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 138162.
  • Ash, D., & Lombana, J. (2013). Reculturing museums: Working toward diversity in informal settings. Journal of Museum Education, 38(1), 6980.
  • Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 136.
  • Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., Feder, M. A. (Eds.), (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Bevan, B., Dillon, J., Hein, G. E., Macdonald, M., Michalchik, V., Miller, D., … Yoon, S. (2010). Making science matter: Collaborations between informal science education organizations and schools. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education. Retrieved from http://caise.insci.org/uploads/docs/MakingScienceMatter.pdf.
  • Bucchi, M., & Neresini, F. (2008). Science and public participation. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 448472). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Calabrese Barton A. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899917.
  • Crowley, K. (2001). Kevin Crowley talk: Just in time explanatory support from Power Girl. Pittsburgh Scientific Reasoning Supergroup. Retrieved from http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/supergroup/.
  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Tenenbaum, H., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258261.
    Direct Link:
  • Dimaggio, P. J. (1991). “Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums. 1920–1940.” In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. (pp. 267292). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147160.
  • Eisenhart, M., & Edwards, L. (2004). Red-eared sliders and neighborhood dogs: Creating third spaces to support ethnic girls' interests in technological and scientific expertise. Children Youth and Environments, 14(2), 156177.
  • Falk, J. H. (2001). Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Falk, J. H., Randol, S., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). Mapping the informal science education landscape: An exploratory study. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 865874.
  • Farrell, B., & Medvedeva, M. (2010). Demographic transformation and the future of museums. Washington, DC: AAM Press.
  • Garibay, C. (2006). Chicago area Latino audience research for the Brookfield Zoo. Unpublished manuscript. Chicago: Garibay Group.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Golding, V. (2009). Learning at the museum frontiers: Identity, race, and power. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936957.
  • Harvey, E. D., & Friedberg, B. (1971). A museum for the people: A report of Proceedings at the Seminar on Neighborhood Museum. New York, NY: Acanthus Press.
  • Hein, G.E. (1998). Learning in the museum. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Humphrey, T., & Gutwill, J. (2005). Fostering active prolonged engagement. San Francisco, CA: The Exploratorium.
  • Hood, M. G. (2004). Staying away: Why people choose not to visit museums. In G. Anderson (Eds.), Reinventing the museum: Historical and contemporary perspectives on the paradigm shift (pp. 150157.). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (Ed.) (1999). The educational role of the museum. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kleinman, D. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2001). Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “knowledge worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory and Society, 30(4), 451492.
  • Knorr Cetina K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Koelble, T. A. (1995). The new institutionalism in political science and sociology. Comparative Politics, 27(2), 231243.
  • Kossek, E. E., Lobel, S. A., & Brown, J. (2006). Human resource strategies to manage workforce diversity. In A. M. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 5374). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812836.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289307.
  • Macdonald, S. (Ed.). (1997). The politics of display: Museums, science, culture. New York, NY: Routledge
  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734749.
  • Merton R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810), 5663.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 115120.
  • Moore, K. (2005). Powered by the people: Scientific authority in participatory science. In S. Frickel & K. Moore (Eds.), The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power (pp. 299323.). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • National Science and Technology Council. (2013). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Education 5-Year Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States.
  • Nightingale, E., & Mahal, C. (2012). The heart of the matter: Integrating equality diversity into the policy practice of museums galleries. In R. Sandell & E. Nightingale (Eds.), Museums, equality and social justice (pp. 1337.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ogawa, R. T., Crain, R., Loomis, M., & Ball, T. (2008). CHAT-IT: Toward conceptualizing learning in the context of formal organizations. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 8395.
  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601626.
  • Persson, P. E. (2000). Community impact of science centers: Is there any? Curator: The Museum Journal, 43(1), 917.
  • Phillips, M., Finkelstein, D., & Wever-Frerichs, S. (2007). School site to museum floor: How informal science institutions work with schools. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 14891507.
  • President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's Future. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States.
  • Rahm, J. (2008). Urban youths' hybrid positioning in science practices at the margin: A look inside a school-museum-scientist partnership project and an after-school science program. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(1), 97121.
  • Sandell, R., & Nightingale, E. (Eds.), (2012). Museums, equality and social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), 195227.
  • Stanovich K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21(4), 360407.
  • Stein, J.K., Garibay, C., & Wilson, K. (2008). Engaging immigrant audiences in museums. Museums & Social Issues, 3(2), 179171.
  • Tomlinson, F., & Schwabenland, C. (2010). Reconciling competing discourses of diversity? The UK non-profit sector between social justice and the business case. Organization, 17(1), 101121.
  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Turnbull, D. (1997). Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions. Futures, 29(6), 551562.
  • Vallas, S. P., & Kleinman, D. L. (2008). Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: The confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology. Socio-Economic Review, 6(2), 283311.
  • Vossoughi, S., Escudé, M., Kong, F., & Hooper, P. (2013). Tinkering, learning & equity in the after-school setting. Paper presented at Fablearn 2013: Digital Fabrication in Education Conference. October 27, 2013; Stanford, CA. Retrieved from: http://fablearn.stanford.edu/2013/wp-content/uploads/Tinkering-Learning-Equity-in-the-After-school-Setting.pdf.
  • Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: Sage Publications.