SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. (1990). Student-teachers' conceptions of science, teaching and learning: A case study in preservice science education. International Journal of Science Education, 12 (4), 381390.
  • Aikenhead, G. (1972). The measurement of knowledge about science and scientists: An investigation into the development of instruments for formative evaluation. Dissertations Abstracts International, 33, 6590A. (University Microfilms No. 72–21, 423)
  • Aikenhead, G. (1973). The measurement of high school students' knowledge about science and scientists. Science Education, 57 (4), 539549.
  • Aikenhead, G. (1979). Science: A way of knowing. The Science Teacher, 46 (6), 2325.
  • Aikenhead, G. (1987). High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society. II. Characteristics and limitations of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 71 (4), 459487.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anderson, K. E. (1950). The teachers of science in a representative sampling of Minnesota schools. Science Education, 34 (1), 5766.
  • Bady, R. A. (1979). Students' understanding of the logic of hypothesis testing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16 (1), 6165.
  • Bateson, D. J. (1990). Science achievement in semester and all-year courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (3), 233240.
  • Behnke, F. L. (1961). Reactions of scientists and science teachers to statements bearing on certain aspects of science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 61, 193207.
  • Billeh, V., & Hasan, O. (1975). Factors affecting teachers' gain in understanding the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12 (3), 209219.
  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (1962). Processes of science test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Bloom, J. W. (1989). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of science: Science, theories and evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (4), 401415.
  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1989). The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: Case studies of teachers' personal theories. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (4), 437449.
  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3), 5362.
  • Broadhurst, N. A. (1970). A study of selected learning outcomes of graduating high school students in South Australian schools. Science Education, 54 (1), 1721.
  • Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328375). New York: Macmillan.
  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). “An experiment is when you try it and see if it works”: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514529.
  • Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1968). An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective secondary science teachers. Science Education, 58 (4), 358363.
  • Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1970a). An analysis of the relationship between prospective science teachers' understanding of the nature of science and certain academic variables. Georgia Academy of Science, 148158.
  • Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1970b). An analysis of experienced science teachers' understanding of the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 70, 366376.
  • Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers. (1907). A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241247.
  • Cobern, W. W. (1989). A comparative analysis of NOSS profiles on Nigerian and American preservice, secondary science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26 (6), 533541.
  • Cooley, W., & Klopfer, L. (1963). The evaluation of specific educational innovations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1 (1), 7380.
  • Cotham, J., & Smith, E. (1981). Development and validation of the conceptions of scientific theories test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18 (5), 387396.
  • Crumb, G. H. (1965). Understanding of science in high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3 (3), 246250.
  • Durkee, P. (1974). An analysis of the appropriateness and utilization of TOUS with special reference to high-ability students studying physics. Science Education, 58 (3), 343356.
  • Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26 (6), 467501.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye. New York: Macmillan.
  • Feyerabend, D. (1975). Against method. London: Verso Publishing.
  • Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Perspective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75 (1), 121134.
  • Gennaro, E. O. (1964). A comparative study of two methods of teaching high school biology—BSCS Yellow Version and laboratory blocks with collateral reading. Dissertations Abstracts International, 25, 3996. (University Microfilms No. 64–13, 878)
  • Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (1), 7380.
  • Gould, S. J. (1980). The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline. Paleobiology, 6 (1), 96118.
  • Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3 (1), 115151.
  • Gruber, H. E. (1963). Science as doctrine or thought? A critical study of nine academic year institutes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1 (2), 124128.
  • Haukoos, G. D., & Penick, J. A. (1983). The influence of classroom climate in science process and content achievement of community college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20 (7), 629637.
  • Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters. New York: Doubleday.
  • Hempel, C. C. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Herron, J. D. (1977). Implicit curriculum—Where values are really taught. The Science Teacher, 44 (3), 3031.
  • Horner, J., & Rubba, P. (1978). The myth of absolute truth. The Science Teacher, 45 (1), 2930.
  • Horner, J., & Rubba, P. (1979). The laws are mature theories fable. The Science Teacher, 45 (2), 31.
  • House, E. R. (1991). Realism in research. Educational Researcher, 20 (6), 29, 25.
  • Hukins, A. (1963). A factorial investigation of measures of achievement of objectives in science teaching. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
  • Hurd, P. D. (1960). Biological education in American secondary schools, 1890–1960. Washington, DC: AIBS.
  • Hurd, P. D. (1969). New directions in teaching secondary school science. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. (1972). Psychology of reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jones, K. M. (1965). The attainment of understandings about the scientific enterprise, scientists, and the aims and methods of science by students in a college physical science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3 (1), 4749.
  • Jungwirth, E. (1970). An evaluation of the attained development of the intellectual skills needed for ‘understanding of the nature of scientific enquiry’ by BSCS pupils in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7 (2), 141151.
  • Kimball, M. E. (1968). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2 (1), 36.
  • King, B. B. (1991). Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75 (1), 135141.
  • Kleinman, G. (1965). Teachers' questions and student understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3 (4), 307317.
  • Klopfer, L., & Cooley, W. (1961). Test on understanding science, Form W. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Klopfer, L. & Cooley, W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1 (1), 3347.
  • Korth, W. (1969). Test every senior project: Understanding the social aspects of science. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
  • Koulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of science: An empirical study of teachers' views. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (2), 173184.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I.Lakatos & A.Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Lavach, J. F. (1969). Organization and evaluation of an in-service program in the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6 (2), 166170.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1983). Delineating classroom variables related to students' conception of the nature of science. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 483A. (University Microfilms No. 84–10, 728)
  • Lederman, N. G. (1986a). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to changes in students' conceptions of the nature of science. Science Education, 70 (1), 319.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1968b). Students' and teachers' understanding of the nature of science: A reassessment. School Science and Mathematics, 86 (2), 9199.
  • Lederman, N. G., & Druger, M. (1985). Classroom factors related to changes in students' conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22 (7), 649662.
  • Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74 (2), 225239.
  • Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71 (5), 721734.
  • Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • MacDonald, M. A., & Rogan, J. M. (1990). Innovation in South African science education (Part 2): Factors influencing the introduction of instructional change. Science Education, 74 (1), 119.
  • Mackay, L. D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8 (1), 5766.
  • Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology: Observations of an evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students. Science, 126, 384390.
  • Miller, P. E. (1963). A comparison of the abilities of secondary teachers and students of biology to understand science. Iowa Academy of Science, 70, 510513.
  • Munby, H. (1976). Some implications of language in science education. Science Education, 60 (1), 115124.
  • Munby, H. (1982). The place of teachers' beliefs in research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternative methodology. Instructional Science, 11, 201225.
  • Munby, H. (1983a). An investigation into the measurement of attitudes in science education. Columbus, OH: SMEAC Information Reference Center.
  • Munby, H. (1983b). Thirty studies involving the “Scientific Attitude Inventory”: What confidence can we have in this instrument? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20 (2), 141162.
  • National Science Teachers Association. (1962). The NSTA position on curriculum development in science. The Science Teacher, 29 (9), 3237.
  • National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education of the 1980's. Washington, DC: Author.
  • National Society for the Study of Education. (1960). Rethinking science education (59th Yearbook, Part I). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ogunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective science teachers' understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19 (1), 2532.
  • Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Ramsey, G., & Howe, R. W. (1969). An analysis of research on instructional procedures in secondary school science. The Science Teacher, 36 (4), 6270.
  • Robinson, J. T. (1969). Philosophy of science: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6 (1), 99104.
  • Rothman, A. I. (1969). Teacher characteristics and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6 (4), 340348.
  • Rubba, P. A. (1977). The development, field testing and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Dissertations Abstracts International, 38, 5378A. (University Microfilms No. 78–00, 998)
  • Rubba, P. A., & Andersen, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62 (4), 449458.
  • Rubba, P., Horner, J., & Smith, J. M. (1981). A study of two misconceptions about the nature of science among junior high school students. School Science and Mathematics, 81, 221226.
  • Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Saunders, H. N. (1955). The teaching of general science in tropical secondary schools. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidt, D. J. (1967). Test on understanding science: A comparison among school groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5 (4), 365366.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1978). Science, curriculum and liberal education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 414.
  • Sorensen, L. L. (1966). Change in critical thinking between students in laboratory-centered and lecture-demonstration-centered patterns of instruction in high school biology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 26, 6567A. (University Microfilms No. 66–03, 939)
  • Stallings, J. (1982). Applications of classroom research of the 1970's to mathematics and science instruction. In R.Yager (Ed.), What research ways to the science teacher (Vol. 4, pp. 721). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
  • State Education Department. (1982). Regents biology syllabus. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
  • Tamir, P. (1972). Understanding the process of science by students exposed to different science curricula in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9 (3), 239245.
  • Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75 (1), 5768.
  • Trent, J. (1965). The attainment of the concept “understanding science” using contrasting physics courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3 (3), 224229.
  • Troxel, V. A. (1968). Analysis of instructional outcomes of students involved with three sources in high school chemistry. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
  • Welch, W. W. (1967). Science process inventory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Welch, W. W. (1969). Curriculum evaluation. Review of Educational Research, 39, 429443.
  • Welch, W. W. (1979). Twenty years of science curriculum developments: A look back. In D. C.Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (vol. 7, pp. 282306). Washington DC: AERA.
  • Welch, W. W., & Walberg, H. J. (1968). An evaluation of summer institute programs for physics teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5 (2), 105109.
  • Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics. Science Education, 75 (1), 922.
  • Wilson, L. (1954). A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society. Science Education, 38 (2), 159164.
  • Yager, R. E. (1966). Teacher effects upon the outcomes of science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4 (4), 236242.
  • Yager, R. E., & Wick, J. W. (1966). Three emphases in teaching biology: A statistical comparison of the results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4 (1), 1620.
  • Zeidler, D. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1989). The effects of teachers' language on students' conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26 (9), 771783.