SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Sevgi Aydin, Patricia M. Friedrichsen, Yezdan Boz, Deborah L. Hanuscin, Examination of the topic-specific nature of pedagogical content knowledge in teaching electrochemical cells and nuclear reactions, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014, 15, 4, 658

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Kamisah Osman, Tien Tien Lee, IMPACT OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA MODULE WITH PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS ON STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND MOTIVATION IN THE LEARNING OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 2, 395

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Alexandra R. Brandriet, Stacey Lowery Bretz, The Development of the Redox Concept Inventory as a Measure of Students’ Symbolic and Particulate Redox Understandings and Confidence, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 8, 1132

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Paul D. Price, Roger W. Kugel, The New AP Chemistry Exam: Its Rationale, Content, and Scoring, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 9, 1340

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Beatriz Sanmartín, Joan J. Solaz-Portolés, Vicent Sanjosé, Una aproximación a las concepciones de estudiantes preuniversitarios y universitarios sobre pilas galvánicas, Educación Química, 2014, 25, 2, 139

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Yıldızay Ayyıldız, Leman Tarhan, Case study applications in chemistry lesson: gases, liquids, and solids, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2013, 14, 4, 408

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Burcin Acar Sesen, Leman Tarhan, Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School Students’ Achievements and Attitudes, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 1, 413

    CrossRef

  8. You have free access to this content8
    KARIM M. HAMZA,, PER-OLOF WICKMAN, Supporting students’ progression in science: Continuity between the particular, the contingent, and the general, Science Education, 2013, 97, 1
  9. 9
    Nesli Kala, Fatma Yaman, Alipaşa Ayas, THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PREDICT–OBSERVE–EXPLAIN TECHNIQUE IN PROBING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING ABOUT ACID–BASE CHEMISTRY: A CASE FOR THE CONCEPTS OF pH, pOH, AND STRENGTH, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2013, 11, 3, 555

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Ding Teng Sia, David F. Treagust, A. L. Chandrasegaran, HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PROFICIENCY AND CONFIDENCE LEVELS IN DISPLAYING THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF BASIC ELECTROLYSIS CONCEPTS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2012, 10, 6, 1325

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Tien Tien Lee, Kamisah Osman, Interactive Multimedia Module in the Learning of Electrochemistry: Effects on Students’ Understanding and Motivation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 46, 1323

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Hyun-Jung Kim, Hun-Gi Hong, Science High School Students' Understandings on Chemical Cells : In Relation to Chemical Equilibrium from the Microscopic Viewpoint at Molecular Level, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2012, 56, 6, 731

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Basil M. Naah, Michael J. Sanger, Student misconceptions in writing balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012, 13, 3, 186

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Deborah P. Rosenthal, Michael J. Sanger, Student misinterpretations and misconceptions based on their explanations of two computer animations of varying complexity depicting the same oxidation–reduction reaction, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012, 13, 4, 471

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Sri Rahayu, David F. Treagust, A.L. Chandrasegaran, Masakazu Kita, Suhadi Ibnu, Assessment of electrochemical concepts: a comparative study involving senior high-school students in Indonesia and Japan, Research in Science & Technological Education, 2011, 29, 2, 169

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Özlem Altınkaynak Yaylacı, Havva Yamak, Nusret Kavak, Examining pre-service science teachers’ opinions about holistic approach in science: Electrical energy example, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 15, 2764

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Han-Chin Liu, Hsueh-Hua Chuang, Investigation of the impact of two verbal instruction formats and prior knowledge on student learning in a simulation-based learning environment, Interactive Learning Environments, 2011, 19, 4, 433

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Karim M Hamza, Per-Olof Wickman, Beyond explanations: What else do students need to understand science?, Science Education, 2009, 93, 6
  19. 19
    Pinar Seda Çetin, Ebru Kaya, Ömer Geban, Facilitating Conceptual Change in Gases Concepts, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2009, 18, 2, 130

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Sevgi Aydin, Nurdane Aydemir, Yezdan Boz, Ayla Cetin-Dindar, Oktay Bektas, The Contribution of Constructivist Instruction Accompanied by Concept Mapping in Enhancing Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Chemistry in the Laboratory Course, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2009, 18, 6, 518

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Yezdan Boz, Turkish Prospective Chemistry Teachers' Alternative Conceptions about Acids and Bases, School Science and Mathematics, 2009, 109, 4
  22. You have free access to this content22
    Karim M. Hamza, Per-Olof Wickman, Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science, Science Education, 2008, 92, 1
  23. 23
    Burcin Acar, Leman Tarhan, Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Understanding of Metallic Bonding, Research in Science Education, 2008, 38, 4, 401

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Mei-Hung Chiu, A National Survey of Students’ Conceptions of Chemistry in Taiwan, International Journal of Science Education, 2007, 29, 4, 421

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Burcin Acar, Leman Tarhan, Effect of Cooperative Learning Strategies on Students' Understanding of Concepts in Electrochemistry, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2007, 5, 2, 349

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Shyan-Jer Lee, Exploring Students’ Understanding Concerning Batteries—Theories and Practices, International Journal of Science Education, 2007, 29, 4, 497

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Hans-Jürgen Schmidt, Annette Marohn, Allan G. Harrison, Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2007, 44, 2
  28. 28
    Nejla Yürük, The Effect of Supplementing Instruction with Conceptual Change Texts on Students’ Conceptions of Electrochemical Cells, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2007, 16, 6, 515

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Analysis and Improvement of Experiments for Electrolysis of an Aqueous CuCl2 Solution in High School Science Textbooks, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2006, 50, 4, 328

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Ibrahim Bilgin, Promoting Pre-service Elementary Students' Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium through Discussions in Small Groups, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2006, 4, 3, 467

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Muammer Çalik, A Cross-Age Study of Different Perspectives in Solution Chemistry from Junior to Senior High School, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2005, 3, 4, 671

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Timothy K Shih, Ya-Fung Chang, Hun-Hui Hsu, Ying-Hong Wang, Yung-Hui Chen, A VR-based shared web system for distance education, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2004, 1, 4, 225

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    The Problems of Chemistry Teachers' and Pre-service Teachers' Conceptions in the Prediction of Electrolysis Products, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2004, 48, 5, 519

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Analysis of Voltaic Cell Described in the Science Textbooks of Secondary Schools, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2002, 46, 4, 363

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    The Influence of Mental Capacity and Understanding of the Oxidation Reduction Concepts on Senior and Science High School Students' Completion of the Balancing Redox Equations, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2002, 46, 4, 345

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Norman G. Lederman, A Partial List of the Empirical Theoretical Literature on Subject-Specific Pedagogy, School Science and Mathematics, 2001, 101, 2
  37. 37
    Gayle Nicoll, A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions, International Journal of Science Education, 2001, 23, 7, 707

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Allan G. Harrison, David F. Treagust, A typology of school science models, International Journal of Science Education, 2000, 22, 9, 1011

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Michael J. Sanger, Thomas J. Greenbowe, Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies, International Journal of Science Education, 2000, 22, 5, 521

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Onno De Jong, Jeannine Acampo, Adri Verdonk, Problems in Teaching the Topic of Redox Reactions: Actions and Conceptions of Chemistry Teachers, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1995, 32, 10
  41. 41
    Patrick J. Garnett, Pamela J. Garnett, Mark W. Hackling, Students' Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning, Studies in Science Education, 1995, 25, 1, 69

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Pamela J. Garnett, David F. Treagust, Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1992, 29, 10
  43. 43
    Hans-Dieter Barke, Learners Ideas, Misconceptions, and Challenge,