SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Leslie U. Bradbury, Linking Science and Language Arts: A Review of the Literature Which Compares Integrated Versus Non-integrated Approaches, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014, 25, 4, 465

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Alberto Esquinca, Blanca Araujo, María Teresa de la Piedra, Meaning Making and Translanguaging in a Two-Way Dual-Language Program on the U.S.-Mexico Border, Bilingual Research Journal, 2014, 37, 2, 164

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Louisa Tomas, Stephen M. Ritchie, The Challenge of Evaluating Students’ Scientific Literacy in a Writing-to-Learn Context, Research in Science Education, 2014,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    William L. Romine, Lloyd H. Barrow, William R. Folk, Exploring Secondary Students' Knowledge and Misconceptions about Influenza: Development, validation, and implementation of a multiple-choice influenza knowledge scale, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 11, 1874

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Tova Michalsky, Integrating Skills and Wills Instruction in Self-Regulated Science Text Reading for Secondary Students, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 11, 1846

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Leslie Bradbury, Beth Frye, Lisa Gross, The Capture: Kidnapping Students’ Interests Using theGuardians of Ga’Hoole, Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 2013, 50, 4, 134

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Nicole J. Glen, Sharon Dotger, Writing Like a Scientist: Exploring Elementary Teachers’ Understandings and Practices of Writing in Science, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2013, 24, 6, 957

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    VICTOR SAMPSON, PATRICK ENDERLE, JONATHON GROOMS, SHELBIE WITTE, Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas, Science Education, 2013, 97, 5
  9. 9
    Jing-Ru Wang, Shin-Feng Chen, Reuy-Fen Tsay, Ching-Ting Chou, Sheau-Wen Lin, Huey-Lien Kao, DEVELOPING A TEST FOR ASSESSING ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF SCIENCE TEXTS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2012, 10, 4, 955

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Mirko Marušić, Josip Sliško, Effects of two different types of physics learning on the results of CLASS test, Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2012, 8, 1

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Donna M. Chamely-Wiik, Jerome E. Haky, Jeffrey R. Galin, From Bhopal to Cold Fusion: A Case-Study Approach to Writing Assignments in Honors General Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89, 4, 502

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Mirko Marušić, Josip Sliško, Influence of Three Different Methods of Teaching Physics on the Gain in Students' Development of Reasoning, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 2, 301

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Rogerio Gonçalves Nigro, Silvia Frateschi Trivelato, Knowledge, its Application, and Attitudes Associated with the Reading of Diverse Genres of Science Texts, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 16, 2529

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Leigh N. Wood, Practice and conceptions: communicating mathematics in the workplace, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2012, 79, 1, 109

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Gina N. Cervetti, Jacqueline Barber, Rena Dorph, P. David Pearson, Pete G. Goldschmidt, The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49, 5
  16. 16
    Do-Young Kang, Myung-Hwan Shin, Pil-Yeo Shin, Hat-Nim We, Kyung-Uk Yun, Chan-Ho Yang, Ji-Yeong Kim, Hyun-Sik Min, Tae-Hee Noh, Chan-Jong Kim, The Types of Interlanguage of Middle School Students in the Process of Learning Diastrophism, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2012, 33, 1, 59

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Douglas Allchin, Toward clarity on Whole Science and KNOWS, Science Education, 2012, 96, 4
  18. 18
    Tracy S. Craig, Categorization and analysis of explanatory writing in mathematics, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2011, 42, 7, 867

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Douglas Allchin, Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science, Science Education, 2011, 95, 3
  20. 20
    Hyun-Jung Cha, Chan-Jong Kim, Seung-Ho Maeng, Linguistic Characteristics of Middle School Students' Writing on Earth Science Themes Through Analysis of Its Genre and Register, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2011, 32, 1, 84

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Jing-Ru Wang, Yuh-Chao Wang, Hsin-Jung Tai, Wen-Ju Chen, INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INQUIRY-BASED INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND READING ABILITIES, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2010, 8, 5, 801

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Jason L. G. Braasch, Susan R. Goldman, The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning From Analogies in Science Texts, Discourse Processes, 2010, 47, 6, 447

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Mark Girod, Todd Twyman, Comparing the added value of blended science and literacy curricula to inquiry-based science curricula in two 2nd-grade classrooms, Journal of Elementary Science Education, 2009, 21, 3, 13

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Judith Morrison, Elementary preservice teachers’ use of science notebooks, Journal of Elementary Science Education, 2008, 20, 2, 13

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Zhihui Fang, Linda Lamme, Rose Pringle, Jennifer Patrick, Jennifer Sanders, Courtney Zmach, Sara Charbonnet, Melissa Henkel, Integrating Reading into Middle School Science: What we did, found and learned, International Journal of Science Education, 2008, 30, 15, 2067

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Pietro Boscolo, Barbara Arfé, Mara Quarisa, Improving the quality of students' academic writing: an intervention study, Studies in Higher Education, 2007, 32, 4, 419

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    C. A. Garland, D. L. Ratay, Using Literacy Techniques to Teach Astronomy to Non-Science Majors, Astronomy Education Review, 2007, 6, 1, 59

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Gregory J. Feist, How Development and Personality Influence Scientific Thought, Interest, and Achievement., Review of General Psychology, 2006, 10, 2, 163

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2006, 49, 4, 346

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Hans Ernst Fischer, Klaus Klemm, Detlev Leutner, Elke Sumfleth, Rüdiger Tiemann, Joachim Wirth, Framework for Empirical Research on Science Teaching and Learning, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2005, 16, 4, 309

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Jazlin Ebenezer, Anton Puvirajah, WebCT dialogues on particle theory of matter: Presumptive reasoning schemes, Educational Research and Evaluation, 2005, 11, 6, 561

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Delna Nixon, Valarie L. Akerson, Building bridges: using science as a tool to teach reading and writing, Educational Action Research, 2004, 12, 2, 197

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Margaret A. Moore-Hart, Peggy Liggit, Peggy Daisey, Making the Science Literacy Connection: After-School Science Clubs, Childhood Education, 2004, 80, 4, 180

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Biotechnology: Writing to a Younger Audience, The American Biology Teacher, 2004, 66, 5, 333

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Liesl Hohenshell, Brian Hand, Jay Staker, Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Biotechnology: Writing to a Younger Audience, The American Biology Teacher, 2004, 66, 5, 333

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Larry D. Yore, Brian M. Hand, Marilyn K. Florence, Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2004, 41, 4
  37. 37
    M. V. Martínez-Gracia, M. J. Gil-Quýlez, J. Osada, Genetic engineering: A matter that requires further refinement in Spanish secondary school textbooks, International Journal of Science Education, 2003, 25, 9, 1148

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Kimberley Penney, Stephen P. Norris, Linda M. Phillips, Glenn Clark, The anatomy of junior high school science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison to media reports of science, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2003, 3, 4, 415

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Peggy Daisey, The value of writing a “how-to” book to reduce the writing apprehension of secondary preservice science and mathematics, Reading Research and Instruction, 2003, 42, 3, 75

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Trish Stoddart, America Pinal, Marcia Latzke, Dana Canaday, Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2002, 39, 8
  41. 41
    Nancy R. Romance, Michael R. Vitale, Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications, International Journal of Science Education, 2001, 23, 4, 373

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Bob Campbell, Loveness Kaunda, Saalih Allie, Andy Buffler, Fred Lubben, The communication of laboratory investigations by university entrants, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2000, 37, 8
  43. 43
    Birgit V. Musheno, Anton E. Lawson, Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1999, 36, 1
  44. 44
    Mary Ratcliffe, Evaluation of abilities in interpreting media reports of scientific research, International Journal of Science Education, 1999, 21, 10, 1085

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Virpi Slotte, Kirsti Lonka, Spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts, International Journal of Science Education, 1999, 21, 5, 515

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    David J. Spence, Larry D. Yore, Richard L. Williams, The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students' metacognition and comprehension of specific science text, Journal of Elementary Science Education, 1999, 11, 2, 15

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    José María de Posada, The presentation of metallic bonding in high school science textbooks during three decades: Science educational reforms and substantive changes of tendencies, Science Education, 1999, 83, 4
  48. 48
    Valarie L. Dickinson, Terrell A. Young, Elementary Science and Language Arts: Should We Blur the Boundaries?, School Science and Mathematics, 1998, 98, 6
  49. 49
    Angel Vázquez, María Antonia Manassero, Escribir sobre ciencia: la imagen de la ciencia y de los científicos entre los adolescentes, Cultura y Educación, 1997, 9, 2-3, 181

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Patricia M. Rowell, Learning in School Science: The Promises and Practices of Writing, Studies in Science Education, 1997, 30, 1, 19

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    K. Denise Muth, USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING TO IMPROVE READING AND WRITING IN MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1997, 13, 1, 71

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Tamar Levine, Zehava Geldman-Caspar, What Can Be Learned From Informal Student Writings in a Science Context?, School Science and Mathematics, 1997, 97, 7
  53. 53
    Tamar Levine, Zehava Geldman-Caspar, Informal Science Writing Produced by Boys and Girls: writing preference and quality, British Educational Research Journal, 1996, 22, 4
  54. 54
    Okhee Lee, Sandra H. Fradd, Literacy skills in science learning among linguistically diverse students, Science Education, 1996, 80, 6
  55. 55
    Mitch O'toole, Science, Schools, Children and Books: Exploring the Classroom Interface between Science and Language, Studies in Science Education, 1996, 28, 1, 113

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    William G. Holliday, Larry D. Yore, Donna E. Alvermann, The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1994, 31, 9