SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abbuhl, R. J. (2005). The effect of feedback and instruction on writing quality: Legal writing and advanced L2 learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
  • Asher, J. (1969). The Total Physical Response approach to second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 53, 317. doi:10.2307/322091
  • Boers, F. (1996). Spatial prepositions and metaphor: A cognitive semantic journey along the up-down and the front-back dimension. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
  • Boers, F. (2000a). Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialized reading. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 137147. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00017-9
  • Boers, F. (2000b). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 553571. doi:10.1093/applin/21.4.553
  • Boers, F. (2001). Remembering figurative idioms by hypothesizing about their origin. Prospect, 16(3), 3543.
  • Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1998). A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions. ELT Journal, 52, 197204. doi:10.1093/elt/52.3.197
  • Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2005). Finding ways to make phrase learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System, 33, 225238. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.12.007
  • Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., Littlemore, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2008). Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 189216). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Brice Heath, S. (1993). Inner city life through drama: Imagining the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 177192. doi:10.2307/3587142
  • Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216236). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cameron, L., & Low, G. (Eds.). (1999). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carroll, S., Roberge, Y., & Swain, M. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 173198. doi:10.1017/S0142716400005555
  • Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357386. doi:10.1017/S0272263100012158
  • Cazden, C. B. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development, 39, 443448. doi:10.2307/1126956
  • Condon, N. (2008). How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 133158). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Coventry, K. R., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Spatial language learning and the functional geometric framework. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 114138). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Danesi, M. (1986). The role of metaphor in language pedagogy. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 18, 110.
  • Danesi, M. (2008). Conceptual errors in second language learning. In S. De Kop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 231253). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Davis, P., & Rinvolucri, M. (1995). More grammar games: Cognitive, affective and movement activities for EFL students. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Knop, S., & Dirven, R. (2008). Motion and location events in German, French and English: A typological, contrastive and pedagogical approach. In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 295324). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Di Pietro, J. (1987). Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dirven, R. (1985). Metaphor as a basic means for extending the lexicon. In W. Parotté & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor (pp. 85119). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Dixey, J., & Rinvolucri, M. (1978). Get up and do it! Sketch and mime for EFL. London, England: Longman.
  • Eckman, F. R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 120. doi:10.1093/applin/9.1.1
  • Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143188. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002024
  • Ellis, N. (2005). Dynamic systems: The interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305352. doi:10.1017/S027226310505014X
  • Feldman, J. A. (2006). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  • Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL ‘81 (pp. 129139). Washington, DC: TESOL.
  • Gibbs, R. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E., & Casenhiser, D. (2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 197215). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphor and primary scenes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California.
  • Guan, Q. C., Cao, F. C., Chan, D., Perfetti, C., & Wu, S. (2009). Read write integration. Retrieved from http://www.learnlab.org/research/wiki/index.php/Perfetti_-_Read_Write_Integration
  • Hama, M. (2005). The effects of the minilesson on advanced learners’ acquisition of English modals: A case study. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University.
  • Hartshorne, C., & Weiss, P. (Eds.). (1931–1958). The collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce (Vols. 1–4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Holme, R. (2004). Mind, metaphor and language teaching. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and second language teaching. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Holme, R. (2010). A construction grammar for the classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48(4), 355377. doi:10.1515/iral.2010.015
  • Jacques-Dalcroze, E. (1988). Rhythm, music and education. Salem, NH: Ayer (Original work published 1919)
  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reasoning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kövecses, Z., & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17, 326355. doi:10.1093/applin/17.3.326
  • Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London, England: Longman.
  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What human categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Langacker, R. W. (1982). Space grammar, analysability, and the English passive. Language, 58(1), 2280. doi:10.2307/413531
  • Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 6688). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove, England: Language Teaching.
  • Lewis, M. (Ed.). (2000). Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach. Hove, England: Language Teaching.
  • Lindner, S. (1981). A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with up and out. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA.
  • Lindstromberg, S. (1991). Metaphor in ESP: A ghost in the machine. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 207226. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(91)90025-R
  • Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2005). From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics, 26, 241261. doi:10.1093/applin/ami002
  • Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphor as a source of misunderstanding for overseas students in academic lectures. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 333351. doi:10.1080/13562510120061205
  • Littlemore, J. (2003). Interpreting metaphors in the EFL classroom. Les Cahiers de l'APLIUT, 23, 5770.
  • Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to English language teaching and learning. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006a). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006b). Metaphoric competence, second language learning and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27, 268294. doi:10.1093/applin/aml004
  • Low, G. (1988). On teaching metaphor. Applied Linguistics, 9, 125147. doi:10.1093/applin/9.2.125
  • MacLennan, C. H. G. (1994). Metaphors and prototypes in the learning and teaching of grammar and vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 97110.
  • MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Knoll & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 4967). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • MacWhinney, B. (2008). A unified model. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 341371). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Maley, A., & Duff, A. (1978). Drama techniques in language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Manzaneres, J. V., & Rojo Lópes, A. M. (2008). What can language learners tell us about constructions? In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 197230). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • McNeil, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The Phenomenology of Perception, New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.
  • Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Negueruela, E. J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2004). The private function of gesture in second language communicative activity: A study on motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 113147. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00056.x
  • Niemeier, S., & Reif, M. (2008). Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL classroom. In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 325355). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. M. (1997). Slot and frame patterns in the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 123138. doi:10.1017/S0142716400009930
  • Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Metonymy in cognition and language (pp. 1760). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Richardt, S. (2005). Metaphors in languages for special purposes. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: Atriadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456488). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds: A cognitive approach. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez, F. J. (2008). The case of Spanish diminutives and reflexive constructions. In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 121153). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129
  • Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity studies in the social and cultural foundations of language (Vol. 1, pp. 7096). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Talmy, L. (2000a). Towards a cognitive semantics, Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Talmy, L. (2000b) Towards a cognitive semantics, Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1988). Down the garden path: Inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 237246. doi:10.1017/S0142716400007827
  • Tyler, A. (2008). Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456488). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Adult second language acquisition: Methods theory and practice (pp. 139177). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.