Original Article
What Frege's Theory of Identity is Not
Article first published online: 15 MAR 2012
DOI: 10.1002/tht3.6
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc and the Northern Institute of Philosophy
Additional Information
How to Cite
May, R. (2012), What Frege's Theory of Identity is Not. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 1: 41–48. doi: 10.1002/tht3.6
Publication History
- Issue published online: 27 MAR 2012
- Article first published online: 15 MAR 2012
The analysis of identity as coreference is strongly associated with Frege; it is the view in Begriffsschrift, and, some have argued, henceforth throughout his work. This thesis is incorrect: Frege never held that identity is coreference. The case is made not by interpretation of “proof-quotes”, but rather by exploring how Frege actually deploys the concept. Two cases are considered. The first, from Grundgesetze, are the definitions of the core concepts, zero and truth; the second, from Begriffsschrift, is the validity of Leibniz's Law. In both cases, if identity is coreference, results ensue that would be unacceptable to Frege.

2161-2234/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=45a5c35ece11088082a8d8ec40ec332de3d7b84e)
2161-2234/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=ee147ffe01afdaa68cb3bc52504419748451284a)
