Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection
Article first published online: 8 DEC 2013
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 43, Issue 1, pages 72–76, January 2014
How to Cite
Pagani, G., Palai, N., Zatti, S., Fratelli, N., Prefumo, F. and Frusca, T. (2014), Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 43: 72–76. doi: 10.1002/uog.12458
- Issue published online: 3 JAN 2014
- Article first published online: 8 DEC 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 14 MAR 2013 03:10PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 20 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Received: 24 DEC 2012
- 3D ultrasound;
- birth weight;
- estimated fetal weight;
- gestational diabetes;
To evaluate the accuracy of gestation-adjusted birth-weight estimation using a three-dimensional (3D) fractional thigh volume (TVol) method in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to compare it with the conventional two-dimensional method of Hadlock et al.
Pregnant women with GDM were referred at 34 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation for ultrasound examination. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was obtained using both the Hadlock and the TVol methods. Using a gestation-adjusted projection method, predicted birth weight was compared to actual birth weight at delivery.
Based on 125 pregnancies, the TVol method with gestation-adjusted projection had a mean (± SD) percentage error in estimating birth weight of −0.01 ± 5.0 (95% CI, −0.96 to 0.98)% while the method of Hadlock with gestation-adjusted projection had an error of 1.28 ± 9.1 (95% CI, −0.33 to 2.87)%. The mean percentage error of the two methods was significantly different (P = 0.039), while the random error was not (P = 1.0). For the prediction of macrosomia (birth weight ≥ 4000 g, n = 19), sensitivity was 84 and 63% for the TVol and Hadlock methods, respectively (95% CI for difference −2 to 44%, P = 0.22) and specificity was 96 and 89% for the TVol and Hadlock methods, respectively (95% CI for difference 5–9%, P = 0.01).
In women with GDM, a new method of estimating birth weight based on 3D-TVol measurements performed at 34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation and gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight, is more accurate than the standard method based on Hadlock's formula in predicting birth weight. The TVol method has comparable sensitivity but higher specificity than the Hadlock method in predicting neonatal macrosomia. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.