SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, Ballif BC, Eng CM, Zachary JM Savage M, Platt LD, Saltzman D, Grobman WA, Klugman S, Scholl T, Simpson JL, McCall K, Aggarwal VS, Bunke B, Nahum O, Patel A, Lamb AN, Thom EA, Beaudet AL, Ledbetter DH, Shaffer LG, Jackson L. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 21752184.
  • 2
    Itsara A, Cooper GM, Baker C, Girirajan S, Li J, Absher D, Krauss RM, Myers RM, Ridker PM, Chasman DI, Mefford H, Ying P, Nickerson DA, Eichler EE. Population analysis of large copy number variants and hotspots of human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 84: 148161.
  • 3
    Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, McMullan DJ, Davison EV, Maher ER, Kilby MD. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 614.
  • 4
    Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST, A working group of the american college of medical genetics ACMG laboratory quality assurance commitee. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variation. Genetics in Med 2011; 13: 680685.
  • 5
    Khan KS, Terrier G, Glanville J, Sowden AJ, Kleijnen J. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness CRDs Guidance for carrying out or commisioning reviews (2nd edn) CRD report No 4 NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2001. University of York.
  • 6
    McKibbon A, Eady A, Marks S. Identifying and selecting studies for inclusion. In PDQ Evidence-Based Principles and Practice. BC Decker Inc: Hamilton, Canada, 1999; 125127.
  • 7
    Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, Pursley AN, Kang SH, Simovich MJ, Ward PA, Darilek S, Johnson A, Neill SE, Bi W, White LD, Eng CM, Lupski JR, Cheung SW, Beaudet AL. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 2939.
  • 8
    Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, Shih JC, Lin TH, Su YN. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. BJOG 2012; 119: 614625.
  • 9
    Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, Coppinger J, Bandholz AM, Ellison JW, Ravnan JB, Torchia BS, Ballif BC, Rosenfeld JA. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 976985.
  • 10
    Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335: 806808.
  • 11
    Fiorentino F, Napoletano S, Caiazzo F, Sessa M, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Sessa M Nuccitelli A, Biricik A, Gordon A, Rizzo G, Baldi M. Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet 2012. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.253. [Epub ahead of print]
  • 12
    Breman A, Pursley AN, Hixson P, Bi W, Ward P, Bacino CA, Shaw C, Lupski JR, Beaudet A, Patel A, Cheung SW, Van den Veyver I. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 351361.
  • 13
    Schmid M, Stary S, Blaicher W, Gollinger M, Husslein P, Streubel B. Prenatal genetic diagnosis using microarray analysis in fetuses with congenital heart defects. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 376382.
  • 14
    Fiorentino F, Caiazzo F, Napolitano S, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Sessa M, Nuccitelli A, Biricik A, Gordon A, Rizzo G, Baldi M. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 12701282.
  • 15
    Maya I, Davidov B, Gershovitz L, Zalzstein Y, Taub E, Coppinger J Shaffer LG, Shohat M. Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 11311137.
  • 16
    Faas BH, van dB, I, Kooper AJ, Pfundt R, Hehir-Kwa JY, Smits AP De Leeuw N. Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250 k SNP array analysis. J Med Genet 2010; 47: 586594.
  • 17
    Park SJ, Jung EH, Ryu RS, Kang HW, Ko JM, Kim HJ, Cheon CK, Hwang SH, Kang HY. Clinical implementation of whole-genome array CGH as a first-tier test in 5080 pre- and postnatal cases. Mol Cytogenet 2011; 4:12.
  • 18
    Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, Rorem E, Cowan J, Craigo SD, Tighiouart H, Wilkins-Haug LE. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 12131217.
  • 19
    Vialard F, Molina GD, Leroy B, Quarello E, Escalona A, Le Sciellour C, Serazin V, Roume J, Ville Y, de Mazancourt P, Selva J. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 25: 277284.
  • 20
    Evangelidou P, Sismani C, Ioannides M, Christodoulou C, Koumbaris G, Kallikas I, Georgiou I, Velissariou V, Patsalis PC. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations. Mol Cytogenet 2010; 3:24.
  • 21
    Valduga M, Philippe C, Bach SP, Thiebaugeorges O, Miton A, Beri M Bonnet C, Nemos C, Foliguet B, Jonveaux P. A retrospective study by oligonucleotide array-CGH analysis in 50 fetuses with multiple malformations. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 333341.
  • 22
    Leung TY, Vogel I, Lau TK, Chong W, Hyett JA, Petersen OB, Choy KW. Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 314319.
  • 23
    D'Amours G, Kibar Z, Mathonnet G, Fetni R, Tihy F, Desilets V, Nizard S, Michaud JL, Lemyre E. Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype. Clin Genet 2012; 81: 128141.
  • 24
    Bi W, Breman AM, Venable SF, Eng PA, Sahoo T, Lu XY, Beaudet AL, Cheung SW, White LD. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 943949.
  • 25
    Sahoo T, Cheung SW, Ward P, Darilek S, Patel A, Del Gaudio D, Kang SH, Lalani SR, Li J, McAdoo S, Burke A, Shaw CA, Stankiewicz P, Chinault AC, Van den Veyver IB, Roa BB, Beaudet AL, Eng CM. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 2006; 8: 719727.
  • 26
    Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, Jacquemont S, Joubert M, David A , Frebourg T, Rival JM. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 2005; 42: 121128.
  • 27
    Tyreman M, Abbott KM, Willatt LR, Nash R, Lees C, Whittaker J, Simonic I. High resolution array analysis: diagnosing pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings. J Med Genet 2009; 46: 531541.
  • 28
    Srebniak MI, Boter M, Oudesluijs GO, Cohen-Overbeek T, Govaerts LC, Diderich KE, Oegema R, Knapen MF, van de Laar IM, Joosten M, Van Opstal D, Galjaard RJ. Genomic SNP array as a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of foetal ultrasound abnormalities. Mol Cytogenet 2012; 5: 14.
  • 29
    Armengol L, Nevado J, Serra-Juhe C, Plaja A, Mediano C, Garcia-Santiago FA, Villa O, Mansilla E, Preciado C, Fernández L, Ángeles Mori M, García-Pérez L, Lapunzina PD, Pérez-Jurado LA. Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in invasive prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 2012; 131: 513523.
  • 30
    De Gregori M, Ciccone R, Magini P, Pramparo T, Gimelli S, Messa J, Novara F, Vetro A, Rossi E, Maraschio P, Bonaglia MC, Anichini C, Ferrero GB, Silengo M, Fazzi E, Zatterale A, Fischetto R, Previderé C, Belli S, Turci A, Calabrese G, Bernardi F, Meneghelli E, Riegel M, Rocchi M, Guerneri S, Lalatta F, Zelante L, Romano C, Fichera M, Mattina T, Arrigo G, Zollino M, Giglio S, Lonardo F, Bonfante A, Ferlini A, Cifuentes F, Van Esch H, Backx L, Schinzel A, Vermeesch JR, Zuffardi O. Cryptic deletions are a common finding in “balanced” reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients. J Med Genet 2007; 44: 750762.
  • 31
    Park JH, Woo JH, Shim SH, Yang SJ, Choi YM, Yang KS, Cha DH. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis. BMC Med Genet 2010; 11:102.
  • 32
    Rickman L, Fiegler H, Shaw-Smith C, Nash R, Cirigliano V, Voglino G , Ng BL, Scott C, Whittaker J, Adinolfi M, Carter NP, Bobrow M. Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH. J Med Genet 2006; 43: 353361.
  • 33
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE group). JAMA 2000; 283: 20082012.
  • 34
    ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 11611163.
  • 35
    Novelli A, Grati FR, Ballarati L, Bernardini L, Bizzoco D, Camurri L, Casalone R, Cardarelli L, Cavalli P, Ciccone R, Clementi M, Dalprà L, Gentile M, Gelli G, Grammatico P, Malacarne M, Nardone AM, Pecile V, Simoni G, Zuffardi O, Giardino D. Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 384388.