SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Boyd PA, Chamberlain P, Hicks NR. 6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK. Lancet 1998; 352: 15771581.
  • 2
    Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S, and the Eurofetus team. The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 446454.
  • 3
    Todros T. Mutamenti nell'assistenza alla gravidanza e al parto: dall'ostetricia alla medicina materno-fetale. In Nascere nel 2000. Riflessioni per una moderna programmazione, TodrosT, VanaraF (eds). Il Mulino: Bologna, 2001; 239264.
  • 4
    Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technol Assess 2000; 4: 16.
  • 5
    Neilson JP. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy (Cochrane Methodology Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003; http://www.update-software.com [Accessed 17 December 2003].
  • 6
    Jaeggi ET, Sholler GF, Jones ODH, Cooper SG. Comparative analysis of pattern, management and outcome of pre- versus postnatally diagnosed major congenital heart disease: a population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 380385.
  • 7
    Levi S. Ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: polemics around routine ultrasound screening for second trimester fetal malformations. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 285295.
  • 8
    Ministero della Sanità, Decreto Ministeriale 06/03/1995. Aggiornamento del decreto ministeriale 14/04/1984 “Protocolli di accesso agli esami di laboratorio e diagnostica strumentale per le donne in stato di gravidanza ed a tutela della maternità responsabile”. Gazzetta Ufficiale, Serie Generale n. 87 del 13/04/1995.
  • 9
    Ministero della Sanità, Decreto Ministeriale 10/09/1998. Aggiornamento del decreto ministeriale 06/03/1995 concernente l'aggiornamento del decreto ministeriale 14/04/1984 recante i protocolli di accesso agli esami di laboratorio e di diagnostica strumentale per le donne in stato di gravidanza ed a tutela della maternità. Gazzetta Ufficiale, Serie Generale n. 245 del 20/10/1998.
  • 10
    Wilson JM, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health Papers 34, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1968; 1139.
  • 11
    Todros T. Screening prenatale delle cardiopatie congenite. Edit-Symposia. Ginecologia & Ostetricia 2001; 2: 2933.
  • 12
    Leivo T, Touminen R, Saari-Kemppainen A, Ylostalo P, Karjalainen O, Heinonen OP. Cost-effectiveness of one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy. A report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 309314.
  • 13
    Roberts T, Mugford M, Piercy J. Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 960970.
  • 14
    Waitzman NJ, Romano PS. Reduced costs of congenital anomalies from fetal ultrasound: are they sufficient to justify routine screening in the United States? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 847: 141153.
  • 15
    Romano PS, Waitzman NJ. Can decision analysis help us decide whether ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies is worth it? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 847: 154172.
  • 16
    Buechler EJ. Managed care and ultrasound for the diagnosis of fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 847: 181184.
  • 17
    Vintzileos A, Ananth C, Smulian J, Beasoglou T, Knuppel R. Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: a cost-benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 655660.
  • 18
    Henderson J, Bricker L, Roberts T, Mugford M, Garcia J, Neilson J. British National Health Service's costs of antenatal ultrasound screening and follow-up tests. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 154162.
  • 19
    Roberts T, Henderson J, Mugford M, Bricker L, Neilson J, Garcia J. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness. BJOG 2002; 109: 4456.
  • 20
    Fortino A, Lispi L, D'Ippolito F, Ascone G. L'eccessivo ricorso al taglio cesareo—analisi dei dati italiani. Ministero della Salute, Roma, 2002; http://www.ministerosalute.it/programmazione/resources/documenti/sdo/Studio_tagli_cesarei.doc [Accessed 17 December 2003].
  • 21
    Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford UP: Oxford, 1999.
  • 22
    Ministero della Sanità, Decreto Ministeriale 22/07/1996. Prestazioni di assistenza specialistica ambulatoriale erogabili nell'ambito del Servizio Sanitario Nazionale e relative tariffe. Supplemento ordinario n. 150 alla Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 216 del 14/09/1996.
  • 23
    Ministero della Sanità, Decreto ministeriale 30/06/1997. Aggiornamento delle tariffe delle prestazioni di assistenza ospedaliera, di cui al decreto ministeriale 14/12/1994. Supplemento ordinario n. 1178 alla Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 209 del 8/09/1997.
  • 24
    Vanara F, Ponti A, Frigerio A, Segnan N. Analisi dei costi di un programma di screening mammografico. Epidemiol Prev 1995; 19: 318329.
  • 25
    Levi S. Mass screening for fetal malformations: the Eurofetus study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 555558.
  • 26
    Verbeek ALM, Broeders MJM. Evaluation of the Netherlands breast cancer screening programme. Annals of Oncology 2003; 14: 12031205.
  • 27
    Anttila A, Koskela K, Hakama M. Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland. J Med Screen 2002; 9: 153158.
  • 28
    Autier P, Shannoun F, Scharpantgen A, Lux C, Back C, Severi G, Steil S, Hansen-Koenig D. A breast cancer screening programme operating in a liberal health care system: the Luxemburg mammography programme, 1992–1997. Int J Cancer 2002; 97: 828832.
  • 29
    Vanara F, Zappa M, Rosselli del Turco M, Segnan N, Paci E, Ponti A. Analisi costo-efficacia di un programma di screening mammografico esteso a tutto il territorio nazionale. Epidemiol Prev 1997; 21: 118128.
  • 30
    Tarkkanen J, Geagea A, Nieminen P, Anttila A. Quality improvement project in cervical cancer screening: practical measures for monitoring laboratory performance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 8288.
  • 31
    Crane JP, Le Fevre ML, Winborn RC, Evans JK, Ewigman BG, Bain RP, Frigoletto FD, McNellis D, and the RADIUS Study Group. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening. Impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 392399.
  • 32
    Chitty LS, Hunt GH, Moore J, Lobb MO. Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. BMJ 1991; 303: 11651169.
  • 33
    Donati S, Spinelli A, Grandolfo ME, Baglio G, Andreozzi S, Pediconi M, Salinetti S. L'assistenza in gravidanza, al parto e durante il puerperio in Italia. Ann Ist Super Sanita 1999; 35: 289296.
  • 34
    Sabbadini LL. Il percorso della maternità: gravidanza, parto e allattamento al seno. Indagine multiscopo annuale “Condizioni di salute e ricorso ai servizi sanitari. Anni 1999–2000”. Istat: Roma, 2002.
  • 35
    Petticrew MP, Sowden AJ, Lister-Sharp D, Wright K. False-negative results in screening programmes: systematic review of impact and implications. Health Technol Assess 2000; 4: 5.
  • 36
    Kern JH, Hayes CJ, Michler RE, Gersony WM, Quaegebeur JM. Survival and risk factor analysis for the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 170174.
  • 37
    Daubeney PEF, Sharland GK, Cook AC, Keeton BR, Anderson RH, Webber SA. Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: impact of fetal echocardiography on incidence at birth and postnatal outcome. UK and Eire Collaborative Study of Pulmonary Atresia with Intact Ventricular Septum. Circulation 1998; 98: 562566.
  • 38
    Bull C. Current and potential impact of fetal diagnosis on prevalence and spectrum of serious congenital heart disease at term in the UK. British Paediatric Cardiac Association. Lancet 1999; 354: 12421247.
  • 39
    Kumar RK, Newburger JW, Gauvreau K, Kamenir SA, Hornberger LK. Comparison of outcome when hypoplastic left heart syndrome and transposition of the great arteries are diagnosed prenatally versus when diagnosis of these two conditions is made only postnatally. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 16491653.