SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24: 266268.
  • 2
    Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 214218.
  • 3
    Heath VCF, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 312317.
  • 4
    Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Hessabi M. Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 108113.
  • 5
    Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 598603.
  • 6
    Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 538549.
  • 7
    Vimercati A, Greco P, Lopalco P, Loizzi V, Scioscia M, Mei L, Selvaggi RL. The value of ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting post-term pregnancy. J Perinatal Med 2001; 29: 317321.
  • 8
    Severi FM, Bocchi C, Florio P, Picciolini E, D'Aniello G, Petraglia F. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimen- sional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 12611265.
  • 9
    Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, Berghella V, Parker L, Goldberg B, Wapner R. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 351358.
  • 10
    Mowa CN, Jesmin S, Sakuma I, Usip S, Togashi H, Yoshioka M, Hattori Y, Papka R. Characterization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the uterine cervix over pregnancy: effects of denervation and implications for cervical ripening. J Histochem Cytochem 2004; 52: 16651674.
  • 11
    Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, De Smet F, Karlsson ED, Valentin L. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006. DOI: 10.1002/uog.2746.
  • 12
    Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L. Reference data representative of normal findings at two-dimensional and three-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 392402.
  • 13
    Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L. Reference data representative of normal findings at three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; (in press).
  • 14
    Richardson DK, Schwartz JS, Weinbaum PJ, Gabbe SG. Diagnostic tests in obstetrics: a method for improved evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 613618.
  • 15
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 2936.
  • 16
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839843.
  • 17
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271: 703707.