• 1
    Kopans DB. Standardized mammographic reporting. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 257261.
  • 2
    D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Mammographic feature analysis. Semin Roentgenol 1993; 28: 204230.
  • 3
    American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: mammography. In Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: BI-RADS Atlas (4th edn). American College of Radiology: Reston, VA, 2003.
  • 4
    American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: ultrasound. In: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: BI-RADS Atlas (4th edn). American College of Radiology: Reston, VA, 2003.
  • 5
    Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 3540.
  • 6
    Bérubé M, Curpen B, Ugolini P, Lalonde L, Ouimet-Oliva D. Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49: 223228.
  • 7
    Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 12601265.
  • 8
    Hille H, Vetter M, Hackeloer BJ. Re-evaluating the role of breast ultrasound in current diagnostics of malignant breast lesions. Ultraschall Med 2004; 25: 411417.
  • 9
    Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CRB. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol 2001; 36: 217225.
  • 10
    Stavros T, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196: 123134.
  • 11
    Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, Prince JS, Melany ML, Reynolds HE, Jackson VP, Sayre JW, Bassett LW. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999; 213: 889894.
  • 12
    Harper AP, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, Bies JR, Jackson VP. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology 1983; 146: 731736.
  • 13
    Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Floyd CE. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 1995; 196: 817822.
  • 14
    Jackson VP. Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? Radiology 1995; 196: 1415.
  • 15
    Hall FM. Sonography of the breast: controversies and opinions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 16351636.
  • 16
    Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Walsh R, Mengoni P. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 16211625.
  • 17
    Lorenzen J, Wedel AK, Lisboa BW, Loning T, Adam G. Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome. Rofo 2005; 177: 15451551.
  • 18
    Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211: 845850.
  • 19
    Mayi-Tsonga S, Meye JF, Ngou-Mve-Ngou JP, Mendome G, Mounanga M. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of the BI-RADS classification and histologic findings. Sante 2006; 16: 179183.
  • 20
    Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Fischmann A, Fersis N, Vogel U, Claussen CD, Müller-Schimpfle M. Stereotactic vacuum -assisted breast biopsy–success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and optimizing the BI-RADS-correlated indication. Rofo 2003; 175: 99104.
  • 21
    Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, Malekshamran K, Perez I, Ramos E. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 450454.