Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 43–66., , , , , .
Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2001; 357: 176–182., , , , , , , , , , , , , .
Effect of quality of gynaecological ultrasonography on management of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 124–131., , , , , .
Macroscopic characterization of ovarian tumors and the relation to the histological diagnosis. Criteria to be used for ultrasound evaluation. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 35: 139–144., , .
Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 15: 338–347..
Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 11–16., , , , , , , .
Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 273–283..
A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 922–929., , , , , .
Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 81–85., , , .
Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 41–47., , , , .
A comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses: The development of a new logistic regression model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 57–65., , , , , , .
Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 17–25., , , , , , .
Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using an artificial neural network. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 21–30., , , , .
Lack of standardization in gynecological ultrasonography (editorial). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 395–398..
Prospective evaluation of logistic regression models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 75–80., , , , , .
Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: An external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 162–167., , , , , , , .
Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: A prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 357–365., , , .
International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: A consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 500–505., , , , , ;
Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: A multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 8794–8801., , , , , , , , , , .
Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 438–444., , , , , , .
The use of mathematical models to evaluate pelvic masses; can they beat an expert operator? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18: 91–104..
Prospective internal validation of mathematical models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses: results from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) study. Clin Cancer Res (in press)., , , , , , , .
Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 1706–1714., , , , , , , , , .
Interobserver agreement in the results of Doppler examinations of extrauterine pelvic tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 91–96., .