SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Hales CN, Barker DJ. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Br Med Bull 2001; 60: 520.
  • 2
    Barker D. The midwife, the coincidence, and the hypothesis. BMJ 2003; 327: 14281430.
  • 3
    Reyes L, Manalich R. Long-term consequences of low birth weight. Kidney Int Suppl 2005; 97: S107S111.
  • 4
    McMillen IC, Robinson JS. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev 2005; 85: 571633.
  • 5
    Plagemann A. Perinatal nutrition and hormone-dependent programming of food intake. Horm Res 2006; 65(Suppl 3): 8389.
  • 6
    Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963; 32: 793800.
  • 7
    Beattie RB, Johnson P. Practical assessment of neonatal nutrition status beyond birth weight: an imperative for the 1990s. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 842846.
  • 8
    Deter RL, Rossavik IK, Cortissoz C, Hill RM, Hadlock FP. Longitudinal studies of thigh circumference growth in normal fetuses. J Clin Ultrasound 1987; 15: 388393.
  • 9
    Abramowicz JS, Sherer DM, Bar-Tov E, Woods JR. The cheek-to-cheek diameter in the ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 846852.
  • 10
    Abramowicz JS, Sherer DM, Woods JR. Ultrasonographic measurements of cheek-to-cheek diameter in fetal growth disturbances. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 405408.
  • 11
    Matsumoto M, Yanagihara T, Hata T. Three-dimensional qualitative sonographic evaluation of fetal soft tissue. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 24382442.
  • 12
    Hill LM, Guzick D, Boyles D, Merolillo C, Ballone A, Gmiter P. Subcutaneous tissue thickness cannot be used to distinguish abnormalities of fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 268271.
  • 13
    Petrikovsky BM, Oleschuk C, Lesser M, Gelertner N, Gross B. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25: 378382.
  • 14
    Chauhan SP, West DJ, Scardo JA, Boyd JM, Joiner J, Hendrix NW. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 639642.
  • 15
    Galan HL, Rigano S, Radaelli T, Cetin I, Bozzo M, Chyu J, Hobbins JC, Ferrazzi E. Reduction of subcutaneous mass, but not lean mass, in normal fetuses in Denver, Colorado. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 839844.
  • 16
    Padoan A, Rigano S, Ferrazi E, Beaty BL, Battaglia FC, Galan HL. Differences in fat and lean mass proportions in normal and growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 14591464.
  • 17
    Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Parretti E, Altomare F, Di Pierro G, Menghini S, Barbati G, Mello G, Arduini D. Fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT) in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 591597.
  • 18
    Larciprete G, Valensise H, Di Pierro G, Vasapollo B, Casalino B, Arduini D, Jarvis S, Cirese E. Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 258262.
  • 19
    Jeanty P, Romero R, Hobbins JC. Fetal limb volume: a new parameter to assess fetal growth and nutrition. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4: 273282.
  • 20
    Chang FM, Liang RI, Ko HC, Yao BL, Chang CH, Yu CH. Three-dimensional ultrasound-assessed fetal thigh volumetry in predicting birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 331339.
  • 21
    Lee W, Deter RL, Ebersole JD, Huang R, Blanckaert K, Romero R. Birthweight prediction by 3D ultrasonography: fractional limb volume. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 12831292.
  • 22
    Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Gonçalves LF, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R. Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 766774.
  • 23
    Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Gonçalves LF, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Balasubramaniam M, Romero R. The fetal arm: individualized growth assessment in normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 817828.
  • 24
    Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1964; 26: 211246.
  • 25
    Altman DG. Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 2034.
  • 26
    Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W. Applied Linear Regression Models (3rd edn). The McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, 1996.
  • 27
    Bland MJ, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135160.
  • 28
    Widdowson E. Chemical composition of newly born mammals. Nature 1950; 166: 2629.
  • 29
    Ziegler EE. O'Donnell AM, Nelson SE, Fomon SJ. Body composition of the reference fetus. Growth 1976; 40: 329341.
  • 30
    Sparks JW, Girard JR, Battaglia FC. An estimate of the caloric requirements of the human fetus. Biol Neonate 1980; 38: 113119.
  • 31
    Meadows NJ, Till J, Leaf A, Hughes E, Jani B, Larcher V. Screening for intrauterine growth retardation using ratio of mid-arm circumference to occipitofrontal circumference. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 292: 10391040.
  • 32
    Sasanow SR, Georgieff MK, Pereira GR. Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratios: standard curves for anthropometric assessment of neonatal nutritional status. J Pediatr 1986; 109: 311315.
  • 33
    Patterson RM, Pouliot MR. Neonatal morphometrics and perinatal outcome: who is growth retarded? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 691693.
  • 34
    Golebiowska M, Ligenza I, Kobierska I, Zielinska E, Wlazlowski J, Sikora P, Haladaj K. Use of mid-arm and head circumference to estimate gestational age and nutritional status of newborn. Ginekol Pol 1992; 63: 221226.
  • 35
    Excler JL, Sann L, Lasne Y, Picard J. Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status in newborn infants. Discriminative value of mid arm circumference and of skinfold thickness. Early Hum Dev 1985; 11: 169178.
  • 36
    Georgieff MK, Sasanow SR, Mammel MC, Pereira GR. Mid-arm circumference/head circumference ratios for identification of symptomatic LGA, AGA, and SGA newborn infants. J Pediatr 1986; 109: 316321.
  • 37
    Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 2832.
  • 38
    Bernstein IM, Catalano PM. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal body composition for children of diabetic mothers. Invest Radiol 1991; 26: 722726.
  • 39
    Winn HN, Holcomb WL. Fetal nonmuscular soft tissue: a prenatal assessment. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 4: 197199.
  • 40
    Gardeil F, Greene R, Stuart B, Turner JM. Subcutaneous fat in the fetal abdomen as a predictor of growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 209212.
  • 41
    Chang CH, Yu HC, Chang FM, Ko HC, Chen HY. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of normal fetal thigh volume. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 361366.
  • 42
    Chang CH, Yu CH, Ko HC, Chen CL, Chang FM. The efficacy assessment of thigh volume in predicting intrauterine fetal growth restriction by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 883887.
  • 43
    Chang CH, Yu CH, Ko HC, Chen CL, Chang FM. Fetal upper arm volume in predicting intrauterine growth restriction: a three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 14351439.
  • 44
    Murphy VE, Smith R, Giles WB, Clifton VL. Endocrine regulation of human fetal growth: the role of mother, placenta, and fetus. Endocr Rev 2006; 27: 141169.
  • 45
    Sayer AA, Cooper C. Fetal programming of body composition and musculoskeletal development. Early Hum Dev 2005; 81: 735744.