SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Stratmeyer ME. Effects on animals. In An Overview of Ultrasound: Theory, Measurement, Medical Applications, and Biological Effects, StewartHF, StratmeyerME (eds). HHS Publication: Rockville, MD, 1982; 77102.
  • 2
    Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin MA, Mugford M, Nielson J, Roberts T. Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth 2002; 29: 225250.
  • 3
    Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technol Assess 2000; 4: ivi, 1–193.
  • 4
    Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH. Is ultrasound unsound? A review of epidemiological studies of human exposure to ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 293298.
  • 5
    Salvesen KA. Epidemiological prenatal ultrasound studies. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007; 93: 295300.
  • 6
    World Health Organization. WHO Multicentre Study for the Development of Growth Standards from Fetal Life to Childhood: the Fetal Component. Geneva: WHO, 2009 (HRP Project No. A65097).
  • 7
    Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews for Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester.
  • 8
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 20082012.
  • 9
    Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 32.
  • 10
    Gülmezoglu AM, Say L, Betrán AP, Villar J, Piaggio G. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004; 4: 16.
  • 11
    Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408412.
  • 12
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e296.
  • 13
    Normand SL. Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Stat Med 1999; 18: 321359.
  • 14
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177188.
  • 15
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 15391558.
  • 16
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557560.
  • 17
    Stark CR, Orleans M, Haverkamp AD, Murphy J. Short- and long-term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 194200.
  • 18
    Moore RM Jr, Diamond EL, Cavalieri RL. The relationship of birth weight and intrauterine diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 513517.
  • 19
    Grisso JA, Strom BL, Cosmatos I, Tolosa J, Main D, Carson J. Diagnostic ultrasound in pregnancy and low birthweight. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 297301.
  • 20
    Tikkanen J, Heinonen OP. Congenital heart disease in the offspring and maternal habits and home exposures during pregnancy. Teratology 1992; 46: 447454.
  • 21
    Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, McNellis D. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 821827.
  • 22
    Fu S, Bao Y, Zhang J, Hu Y, Wang X, Zhang F. [Effects of B-ultrasonic radiation during pregnancy on reproductive outcome]. [Chinese]. Chung-Hua Yu Fang i Hsueh Tsa Chih [Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine] 2000; 34: 8688.
  • 23
    Hellman LM, Duffus GM, Donald I, Sunden B. Safety of diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics. Lancet 1970; 1: 11331134.
  • 24
    Macdonald W, Newnham J, Gurrin L, Evans S. Effect of frequent prenatal ultrasound on birthweight: follow up at 1 year of age. Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Working Group. Lancet 1996; 348: 482.
  • 25
    Evans S, Newnham J, Macdonald W, Hall C. Characterisation of the possible effect on birthweight following frequent prenatal ultrasound examinations. Early Hum Dev 1996; 45: 203214.
  • 26
    Newnham JP, Evans SF, Michael CA, Stanley FJ, Landau LI. Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1993; 342: 887891.
  • 27
    Newnham JP, Doherty DA, Kendall GE, Zubrick SR, Landau LL, Stanley FJ. Effects of repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations on childhood outcome up to 8 years of age: follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 20382044.
  • 28
    Salvesen KA, Jacobsen G, Vatten LJ, Eik-Nes SH, Bakketeig LS. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent growth during childhood. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 610.
  • 29
    Lyons EA, Dyke C, Toms M, Cheang M. In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: a 6-year follow-up. Radiology 1988; 166: 687690.
  • 30
    Salvesen KA, Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH, Undheim JO, Okland O. Routine ultrasonography in utero and school performance at age 8–9 years. Lancet 1992; 339: 8589.
  • 31
    Kieler H, Ahlsten G, Haglund B, Salvesen K, Axelsson O. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent neurologic development. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91(5 Pt 1): 750756.
  • 32
    Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH. Routine ultrasonography in utero and speech development. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 101103.
  • 33
    Campbell JD, Elford RW, Brant RF. Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal 1993; 149: 14351440.
  • 34
    Bunin GR, Buckley JD, Boesel CP, Rorke LB, Meadows AT. Risk factors for astrocytic glioma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the brain in young children: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994; 3: 197204.
  • 35
    Cartwright RA, McKinney PA, Hopton PA, Birch JM, Hartley AL, Mann JR, Waterhouse JA, Johnston HE, Draper GJ, Stiller C. Ultrasound examinations in pregnancy and childhood cancer. Lancet 1984; 2: 9991000.
  • 36
    Kinnier Wilson LM, Waterhouse JA. Obstetric ultrasound and childhood malignancies. Lancet 1984; 2: 997999.
  • 37
    Naumburg E, Bellocco R, Cnattingius S, Hall P, Ekbom A. Prenatal ultrasound examinations and risk of childhood leukaemia: case-control study. BMJ 2000; 320: 282283.
  • 38
    Shu XO, Jin F, Linet MS, Zheng W, Clemens J, Mills J, Gao YT. Diagnostic X-ray and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer 1994; 70: 531536.
  • 39
    Shu XO, Potter JD, Linet MS, Severson RK, Han D, Kersey JH, Neglia JP, Trigg ME, Robison LL. Diagnostic X-rays and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by immunophenotype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11: 177185.
  • 40
    Sorahan T, Lancashire R, Stewart A, Peck I. Pregnancy ultrasound and childhood cancer: a second report from the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 831832.
  • 41
    Stålberg K, Haglund B, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S, Pfeifer S, Kieler H. Prenatal ultrasound and the risk of childhood brain tumour and its subtypes. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 12851287.
  • 42
    Kieler H, Haglund B, Cnattingius S, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Does prenatal sonography affect intellectual performance? Epidemiology 2005; 16: 304310.
  • 43
    Stålberg K, Haglund B, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S, Hultman CM, Kieler H. Prenatal ultrasound scanning and the risk of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Epidemiology 2007; 18: 577582.
  • 44
    Davies JA, Gallivan S, Spencer JA. Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy. Lancet 1992; 340: 12991303.
  • 45
    A randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound velocimetry of the umbilical artery in low risk pregnancies. Doppler French Study Group. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 419424.
  • 46
    Mason GC, Lilford RJ, Porter J, Nelson E, Tyrell S. Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 130133.
  • 47
    Omtzigt AM, Reuwer PJ, Bruinse HW. A randomized controlled trial on the clinical value of umbilical Doppler velocimetry in antenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 625634.
  • 48
    Wladimiroff JW, Laar J. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal body size. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1980; 59: 177179.
  • 49
    Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH. Ultrasound during pregnancy and subsequent childhood non-right handedness: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 241246.
  • 50
    Kieler H, Axelsson O, Haglund B, Nilsson S, Salvesen KA. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent handedness. Early Hum Dev 1998; 50: 233245.
  • 51
    Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Eik-Nes SH, Hugdahl K, Bakketeig LS. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. BMJ 1993; 307: 159164.
  • 52
    Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH. Ultrasound during pregnancy and birthweight, childhood malignancies and neurological development. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 10251031.
  • 53
    Crowther CA, Kornman L, O'Callaghan S, George K, Furness M, Willson K. Is an ultrasound assessment of gestational age at the first antenatal visit of value? A randomised clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 12731279.
  • 54
    Geerts LT, Brand EJ, Theron GB. Routine obstetric ultrasound examinations in South Africa: cost and effect on perinatal outcome—a prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 501507.
  • 55
    Secher NJ, Hansen PK, Lenstrup C, Eriksen PS. Controlled trial of ultrasound screening for light for gestational age (LGA) infants in late pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986; 23: 307313.
  • 56
    Smith CB. Birth weights of fetuses exposed to diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1984; 3: 395396.
  • 57
    Pizzarello DJ. Teratogenic effects of ionizing radiations and ultrasound. Prog Clin Biol Res 1980; 44: 6776.
  • 58
    Henderson J, Willson K, Jago JR, Whittingham TA. A survey of the acoustic outputs of diagnostic ultrasound equipment in current clinical use. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 699705.
  • 59
    Miller MW, Brayman AA, Abramowicz JS. Obstetric ultrasonography: a biophysical consideration of patient safety—the “rules” have changed. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 241254.
  • 60
    Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Ultrasound and adverse effects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 102103.
  • 61
    Ziskin MC. Intrauterine effects of ultrasound: human epidemiology. Teratology 1999; 59: 252260.
  • 62
    US Dept of Health and Human Services. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging in Pregnancy. In: Public Health Service NIH (ed.). NIH Publication: Washington, 1984; 1213.
  • 63
    Ziskin MC. Update on the safety of ultrasound in obstetrics. Semin Roentgenol 1990; 25: 294298.
  • 64
    Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH, Jacobsen G, Ulstein MK, Brodtkorb CJ, Balstad P, Eriksen BC, Jörgensen NP. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1984; 2: 207211.
  • 65
    Eik-Nes SH, Okland O, Aure JC, Ulstein M. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1984; 1: 1347.
  • 66
    Eik-Nes SH, Salvesen KA, Okland O, Vatten LJ. Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the ‘Alesund’ randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 473478.
  • 67
    Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Jacobsen G, Eik-Nes SH, Okland O, Molne K. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent vision and hearing at primary school age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 243247.
  • 68
    Kieler H, Haglund B, Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent growth, vision and hearing. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 12671272.
  • 69
    Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Eklund G, Fall O, Lindeberg S, Sjödin Y. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; 2: 585588.
  • 70
    Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S. Ultrasonic dating of pregnancies: effect on incidence of SGA diagnoses. A randomised controlled trial. Early Hum Dev 1992; 30: 7579.
  • 71
    Kieler H, Hellberg D, Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O. Pregnancy outcome among non-participants in a trial on ultrasound screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 104109.
  • 72
    Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen OP. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. [See comment]. Lancet 1990; 336: 387391.
  • 73
    Saari-Kemppainen A. Use of antenatal care services in a controlled ultrasound screening trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 1214.
  • 74
    LeFevre ML, Bain RP, Ewigman BG, Frigoletto FD, Crane JP, McNellis D. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on maternal management and outcome. RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) Study Group. [See comment]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 483489.
  • 75
    Duff GB. A randomized controlled trial in a hospital population of ultrasound measurement screening for the small for dates baby. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 374378.
  • 76
    Ewigman B, LeFevre M, Hesser J. A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 189194.
  • 77
    McKenna D, Tharmaratnam S, Mahsud S, Bailie C, Harper A, Dornan J. A randomized trial using ultrasound to identify the high-risk fetus in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 626632.
  • 78
    Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Sinistrality- a side-effect of prenatal sonography: a comparative study of young men. Epidemiology 2001; 12: 618623.
  • 79
    Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Palmgren J, Haglund B, Axelsson O. First trimester ultrasound scans and left-handedness. Epidemiology 2002; 13: 370.
  • 80
    Bellieni CV, Buonocore G, Bagnoli F, Cordelli DM, Gasparre O, Calonaci F, Filardi G, Merola A, Petraglia F. Is an excessive number of prenatal echographies a risk for fetal growth? Early Hum Dev 2005; 81: 689693.
  • 81
    Sylvan K, Ryding EL, Rydhstroem H. Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 11541158.
  • 82
    Belfrage P, Fernstrom I, Hallenberg G. Routine or selective ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 747750.
  • 83
    Geerts L, Theron AM, Grove D, Theron GB, Odendaal HJ. A community-based obstetric ultrasound service. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84: 2331.
  • 84
    Cochlin DL. Effects of two ultrasound scanning regimens on the management of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 885890.
  • 85
    Pastore LM, Hertz-Picciotto I, Beaumont JJ. Risk of stillbirth from medications, illnesses and medical procedures. [See comment]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1999; 13: 421430.
  • 86
    Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB. The Denver developmental screening test. J Pediatr 1967; 71: 181191.